| 173 | 0 | 72 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
回应型政府被视为具有积极价值的政府构建目标,但回应过度又存在被“民意”裹挟的潜在风险。本研究以2017年X幼儿园幼师伤害儿童这一焦点事件的治理过程为案例,考察了8年间政府的回应性治理和自主性治理两种方式的演进逻辑。研究发现,政府对焦点事件的治理大致可分为互相关联、接力转化两个阶段。第一阶段是回应性治理:面对公众压力,政府通常采用运动式治理对公众关注焦点进行情绪性回应和事实回应,迅速缓解舆情,初步进行问题界定,这为第二阶段的自主性治理准备了条件。当外部压力逐渐淡去,相关政府部门与专家型政策企业家形成联盟,依托组织权威和知识权威,采用限定议题范围、阐释因果机制等叙事策略实现对焦点事件背后政策议题的重新界定,政府的自主性因此得以彰显,焦点事件的治理也从第一阶段的表层走向深层。然而,第二阶段的自主性治理也有可能陷入被部门利益裹挟的风险。在以人民为中心的执政理念下,应注意将回应性和自主性价值理念统一在对最广泛公共利益的实质回应上,切实提升治理现代化水平。本文的主要贡献在于初步识别了强回应压力情境下政府回应性治理和自主性治理的接力模式和转化逻辑,有助于深刻理解治理现代化背景下的政府行为。
Abstract：A responsive government is widely regarded as a goal of government building with positive value,but there is a risk of being captured by "public opinion" when the government responds excessively.This study,taking the governance process of the 2017 X Kindergarten's child abuse incident as a case,examines the evolutionary logic of government's responsiveness and autonomy over an eight-year period.The study finds that the governance process triggered by focus events can be roughly divided into two interrelated and sequentially transformative stages.The first stage is responsive governance:in the face of public pressure,the government usually quickly adopts campaign-style governance to respond emotionally and factually to the focal point of public concern.Responsive governance alleviates public opinion pressure,preliminarily defines issues,and lays the groundwork for the second phase of autonomous governance:As external pressure gradually fades,relevant government departments and expert policy entrepreneur form alliances,relying on organizational authority and knowledge authority,employing narrative strategies such as limiting the scope of issues and explaining causal mechanisms to redefine the policy issues behind the focal events.As a result,government autonomy is achieved.The governance of focus events has also moved from the surface level in the first stage to a deeper level.However,the second stage of autonomous governance may also be at risk of being hijacked by departmental interests.Under the people-centered governance philosophy,it is essential to guard against one-dimensional formal and discursive responses,and instead focus on unifying the values of responsiveness and autonomy in substantive responses to the broadest public interests,thereby effectively enhancing the modernization of governance.The primary contribution of this paper lies in its preliminary identification of the relay mode and transformational logic of responsive governance and autonomous governance under strong response pressure scenarios,which can contribute to a deep understanding of government's behavior in the context of modernization of governance.
彼得·埃文斯,迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,西达·斯考克波.2009.找回国家[M].方力维,莫宜端,黄琪轩,等,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.Evans P B,Rueschemeyer D,Skocpol T.2009.Bringing the state back in[M].Fang LW,Mo Y D,Huang Q X,et al.,trans.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company.(in Chinese)
陈贵梧,林晓虹.2021.网络舆论是如何形塑公共政策的?一个“两阶段多源流”理论框架---以顺风车安全管理政策为例[J].公共管理学报,18(2):58-69,168.Chen G W,Lin X H.2021.How do online public opinions shape policy agenda setting?“Two-Stage Multiple Streams”framework-Based on a case study of comprehensive safety inspections policy of riding sharing services[J].Journal of Public Management,18(2):58-69,168.(in Chinese)
戴维·奥斯本,特德·盖布勒.1996.改革政府:企业家精神如何改革着公营部门[M].周敦仁,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社.Osborne D,Gaebler T.1996.Reinventing government[M].Zhou D R,et al.,trans.Shanghai:Shanghai Translation Publishing House.(in Chinese)
冯川.2021.公众满意率考核与回应性治理悖论---基于12345政府服务热线乡村实践的考察[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),35(4):37-46.Feng C.2021.Public satisfaction rate assessment and the paradox of responsive governance:Investigation on practical experience of 12345 government service hotline in rural areas[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),35(4):37-46.(in Chinese)
郭施宏,谭欣.2025.政府借助专家发声更有效吗?---一项自然灾害的调查实验[J].公共管理评论,7(1):246-268.Guo S H,Tan X.2025.Are government communications more effective with expert involvement?An experimental study based on a natural disaster[J].China Public Administration Review,7(1):246-268.(in Chinese)
韩克庆.2014.延迟退休年龄之争---民粹主义与精英主义[J].社会学研究,29(5):120-139,243.Han K Q.2014.Case study on extending retirement age policy:Populism and elitism in the process of Chinese policy-making[J].Sociological Studies,29(5):120-139,243.(in Chinese)
衡霞,吴培豪.2025.遵从的自主性建构:基层政府创造性执行的内在逻辑[J].求实,(1):32-45,110.Heng X,Wu P H.2025.The autonomous construction of compliance:The internal logic of creative implementation of primary-level government[J].Truth Seeking,(1):32-45,110.(in Chinese)
拉塞尔·M.林登.2002.无缝隙政府:公共部门再造指南[M].汪大海,吴群芳,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.Linden R M.2002.Seamless government[M].Wang D H,Wu Q F,et al.,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(in Chinese)
马克斯·韦伯.2010.经济与社会·第1卷[M].阎克文,译.上海:上海人民出版社,322-326.Weber M.2010.Economy and society,Volume 1[M].Yan K W,trans.Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House,322-326.(in Chinese)
孟天广,严宇.2024.协商回应:共识导向的基层回应模式---基于淮安“码”上议的案例研究[J].学习与探索,(6):103-112.Meng T G,Yan Y.2024.Negotiation response:A consensus-oriented grassroots response model-A case study based on Huai'an's“code-based”Consultation[J].Study&Exploration,(6):103-112.(in Chinese)
荣敬本,崔之元,王拴正,等.1998.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M].北京:中央编译出版社.Rong J B,Cui Z Y,Wang S Z,et al.1998.Transformation from the pressurized system to a democratic system of cooperation:Political system reform at the county and township levels[M].Beijing:Central Compilation&Translation Press.(in Chinese)
孙斐.2022.政府形式回应是无奈之举还是必要手段:一个整合性归因模型[J].上海行政学院学报,23(1):28-41.Sun F.2022.Is government formalized response an act of desperation or a necessity:An integrated attribution model[J].The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute,23(1):28-41.(in Chinese)
威廉·阿瑟·刘易斯.1989.二元经济论[M].施炜,等,译.北京:北京经济学院出版社.Lewis W A.1989.Dual economy theory[M].Shi W,et al.,trans.Beijing:Beijing College of Economics Press.(in Chinese)
熊万胜,张彬,张曦予.2021.理解当代中国地方政府自主性的四个维度[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),36(4):112-123.Xiong W S,Zhang B,Zhang X Y.2021.Understanding the four dimensions of local government autonomy[J].Journal of East China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),36(4):112-123.(in Chinese)
杨晓辉.2025.引领式回应:驱动回应型政府工作的新模式---以浙江省S市政府民生实事项目人大代表票决制为例[J].哈尔滨市委党校学报,(2):27-33.Yang X H.2025.Leading response:A new model driving the work of responsive government[J].Journal of the Party School of Harbin Committee of CPC,(2):27-33.(in Chinese)
约翰·W.金登.2017.议程、备选方案与公共政策(修订版)[M].丁煌,方兴,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.Kingdon J W.2017.Agendas,alternatives,and public policies[M].Ding H,Fang X,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(in Chinese)
张华,仝志辉,刘俊卿.2013.“选择性回应”:网络条件下的政策参与---基于留言版型网络问政的个案研究[J].公共行政评论,6(3):101-126,168-169.Zhang H,Tong Z H,Liu J Q.2013.Selective response:Web-based participation in civil participation:A case study of the impact of online platform for citizen participation[J].Journal of Public Administration,6(3):101-126,168-169.(in Chinese)
张楠迪扬,郑旭扬,赵乾翔.2023.政府回应性:作为日常治理的“全回应”模式---基于LDA主题建模的地方政务服务“接诉即办”实证分析[J].中国行政管理,(3):68-78.Zhang N D Y,Zheng X Y,Zhao Q X.2023.Government responsiveness:An allresponse'pattern of daily governance-An empirical study of local government hotline appeals using latent Dirichlet allocation(LDA)[J].Chinese Public Administration,(3):68-78.(in Chinese)
张权,王哲,张楠迪扬.2025.有为型回应:中国地方政府政策制定中的政民互动[J].中国行政管理,41(6):44-56.Zhang Q,Wang Z,Zhang N D Y.2025.Policy responses of Chinese local governments and the four subtypes:An empirical analysis based on the“Livelihood Projects”in City A[J].Chinese Public Administration,41(6):44-56.(in Chinese)
张树华,刘开君.2025.回应型治理:政党底色、逻辑演进与理论展现---以北京接诉即办和浙江新时代“枫桥经验”为案基[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(4):1-14.Zhang S H,Liu K J.2025.Responsible type governance:Party attribute,logical change and theoretical presentation-Based on Beijing's immediate handling of complaints and Zhejiang's“Fengqiao Experience”in new era[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(4):1-14.(in Chinese)
张勇杰.2019.目标群体的社会建构如何转化为公共政策---一个政策议程嵌套的解释框架[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(1):14-25,125.Zhang Y J.2019.How the social construction of the target population translates into public policy?Policy agenda theory building in social construction framework[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(1):14-25,125.(in Chinese)
赵静,薛澜.2017.回应式议程设置模式---基于中国公共政策转型一类案例的分析[J].政治学研究,(3):42-51,126.Zhao J,Xue L.2017.The response-oriented agenda-setting process:The analysis based on the cases of public policy transition in China[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(3):42-51,126.(in Chinese)
珍妮特V.登哈特,罗伯特·B.登哈特.2004.新公共服务:服务,而不是掌舵[M].丁煌,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.Denhardt J V,Denhardt R B.2004.The new public service:Serving,not steering[M].Ding H,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(in Chinese)
中共中央国务院.2018.关于学前教育深化改革规范发展的若干意见[N].人民日报,2018-11-16(001).Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council.2018.Several Opinions on Deepening the Reform and Standardizing the Development of Preschool Education[N].People's Daily,November 16,p.1.
周黎安.2017.转型中的地方政府:官员激励与治理[M].2版.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.Zhou L A.2017.Local governments in transition:Official incentives and governance[M].2nd ed.Shanghai:Gezhi Publishing House,Shanghai Joint Publishing Company,Shanghai People's Publishing House.(in Chinese)
周雪光.2008.基层政府间的“共谋现象”---一个政府行为的制度逻辑[J].社会学研究,(6):1-21,243.Zhou X G.2008.Collusion among local governments:The institutional logic of a government behavior[J].Sociological Studies,(6):1-21,243.(in Chinese)
周雪光,练宏.2011.政府内部上下级部门间谈判的一个分析模型---以环境政策实施为例[J].中国社会科学,(5):80-96,221.Zhou X G,Lian H.2011.Bureaucratic bargaining in the Chinese government:The case of environmental policy implementation[J].Social Sciences in China,(5):80-96,221.(in Chinese)
朱俊明,赵旭,薛澜.2023.危机回应的非预期效应:基于太湖蓝藻事件的分析[J].公共管理学报,20(2):128-139,174.Zhu J M,Zhao X,Xue L.2023.Unintended effects of crisis response:Analysis based on the Tai Hu algae crisis[J].Journal of Public Management,20(2):128-139,174.(in Chinese)
朱旭峰.2011.中国社会政策变迁中的专家参与模式研究[J].社会学研究,25(2):1-27.Zhu X F.2011.Behavioral patterns of expert participation in social policy changes in China[J].Sociological Studies,25(2):1-27.(in Chinese)
庄垂生.2000.政策变通的理论:概念、问题与分析框架[J].理论探讨,(6):78-81.Zhuang C S.2000.Theory of policy flexibility:Concepts,issues,and analytical framework[J].Theoretical Investigation,(6):78-81.(in Chinese)
Eulau H,Karps P D.1977.The puzzle of representation:Specifying components of responsiveness[J].Legislative Studies Quarterly,2(3):233-254.
Hu J R,Gong X,Zhao Y.2025.Mechanical responsiveness:China's online petition system[J].The China Quarterly,262:293-309.
Huang G,Qiao D P,Lu M Y,et al.2022.How child abuse by kindergarten teachers(CAKT) happens in a Chinese context:Findings based on 35 cases of CAKT[J].Children and Youth Services Review,141:106616,doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106616.
Lyu Y W,Chow J C C,Hwang J J.2020.Exploring public attitudes of child abuse in China's mainland:A sentiment analysis of China's social media Weibo[J].Children and Youth Services Review,116:105250.
Meng T G,Su Z.2021.When top-down meets bottom-up:Local officials and selective responsiveness within fiscal policymaking in China[J].World Development,142:105443.
Mergel I,Gong Y W,Bertot J.2018.Agile government:Systematic literature review and future research[J].Government Information Quarterly,35(2):291-298.
Shanahan E A,Jones M D,Mcbeth M K,et al.2018.The narrative policy framework[M]//Weible C M,Sabatier P A.Theories of the Policy Process.4th ed.New York:Routledge,173-213.
Su Z,Meng T G.2016.Selective responsiveness:Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China[J].Social Science Research,59:52-67.
Wang H H,Cheng E W,Chen X,et al.2025.How institutionalized feedback works:Online citizen complaints and local government responsiveness in China[J].Governance,38(2):e12907,doi:10.1111/gove.12907.
(1)新浪博客:《众明星为红黄蓝幼儿园虐童事件发声呼吁保护儿童》,2017年11月24日,http://blog.sina. com. cn/s/blog＿ac72c4c10102x5dy. html,2026年9月24日访问
(2)中华人民共和国教育部官网:《中共中央国务院关于学前教育深化改革规范发展的若干意见》有关情况介绍,2018年11月28日,http://www. moe. gov. cn/jyb＿xwfb/xw＿fbh/moe＿2069/xwfbh＿2018n/xwfb＿20181128/sfcl/201811/t20181128＿361643. html,2026年9月24日访问
(3)中国人大网:《十三届全国人大常委会立法规划》,2018年9月10日,http://www. npc. gov. cn/zgrdw/npc/xinwen/2018-09/10/content＿2061041. htm,2026年9月24日访问
(1)中华人民共和国教育部官网:《加快推进〈学前教育法〉立法进程》,2018年3月11日,参见网址//////////http:www. moe. gov. cnjyb＿xwfbxw＿ztmoe＿357jyzt＿2018n2018＿zt07zt1807＿dbwy201803t20180312＿329641. html,2026年9月24日访问
(1)中华人民共和国教育部官网:《关于政协十三届全国委员会第一次会议第1464号(教育类151号)提案答复的函(摘要)》,2018年8月8日,http://www. moe. gov. cn/jyb＿xxgk/xxgk＿jyta/jyta＿jijiaosi/201902/t20190220＿370494. html,2026年9月24日访问
(2)中华人民共和国教育部官网:《教育部基础教育二司负责人就〈国务院关于当前发展学前教育的若干意见〉答记者问》,2010年12月2日, http://www. moe. gov. cn/jyb＿xwfb/s271/202009/t20200915＿488080. html,2026年9月24日访问
基本信息:
中图分类号:D630
引用信息:
[1]黄冠,徐晓新.从回应性到自主性:焦点事件治理中政府行为的接力模型[J].公共管理评论().
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金青年项目“中国儿童福利立法的议程阻滞与方案改进研究（2008—2023）”（项目批准号：23CSH070）的资助
2026-10-12
2026-10-12
2026-10-12