nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 04, v.4 179-193
社会科学的自反性合法化:以美国工商管理学与公共行政学为例
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“社会科学影响公共政策的历史、机制与中国路径研究”(项目批准号:21&ZD174)资助
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

社会科学承担着两方面的功能。一方面,它要服务于特定实践领域中具体问题的解决;另一方面,它要有助于维护社会的道德秩序。在根本上,社会科学的合法性取决于它能否通过对具体社会问题的有效解决来维护和促进社会的道德秩序。20世纪中期,现代学术制度建立,目的是挑选出好的科学,以充分发挥科学的社会功能。这为社会科学带来了巨大的合法化压力。为证明自身合法性,社会科学转向了学术等级制,通过表明自己处于学术等级制顶端来证明自己是好的科学。由此,社会科学研究变成了学术等级制的自我繁殖,而与通过对具体社会问题的有效解决来维护和促进社会道德秩序的目的渐行渐远。这样一种自反性合法化反而使社会科学陷入了严重的合法性危机。

Abstract:

The social sciences serve two functions. On the one hand, the social sciences should solve specific problems in specific fields of practice. On the other hand, they should help maintain the moral order of society. Fundamentally, the legitimacy of the social sciences depends on whether they can maintain and promote the moral order of society by effectively solving specific social problems. In the mid-20th century, since the development of science had helped to achieve many government goals during World War Ⅱ, the American government took the lead in establishing a modern academic funding system so as to select good sciences that would maximize their social function. Because all scientific research is mainly based on the judgment of the natural sciences about good science,under this funding system there was enormous pressure to legitimatize the social sciences.In order to prove their legitimacy, the social sciences gradually turned to an academic hierarchy, showing that they can produce research results at the top of this hierarchy.Thus, social science research became a self-reproducing academic hierarchy, gradually drifting away from its function of maintaining and promoting a social moral order through effective solutions to specific social problems. From its origins during the progressive movement of the early 20th century, the legitimacy of the social sciences has fundamentally depended on whether and to what extent they can promote an egalitarian moral order in a scientific way. But all such efforts to prove the legitimacy of the social sciences by climbing the academic hierarchy have destroyed the moral order and shaken their legitimacy. Therefore, this paper uses reflexive legitimization to address the problem of legitimacy. The more social science research tries to justify its legitimacy by climbing the hierarchy, the more its legitimacy will be undermined.This article refers to such a development as the reflexive legitimation of social science. The more social science tries to justify itself by climbing the hierarchy, the more it undermines its legitimacy.

参考文献

桑德尔·迈克尔.2008.民主的不满---美国在寻求一种公共哲学[M].曾纪茂,译.南京:江苏人民出版社.

帕森斯·T.1988.现代社会的结构与过程[M].梁向阳,译.北京:光明日报出版社.

泰罗·F.W.1984.科学管理原理[M].胡隆昶,冼子恩,曹丽顺,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社.

王芊霓.(2020-10-22)[2022-08-09].专访|人类学家项飙谈内卷:一种不允许失败和退出的竞争[EB/OL].https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_9648585.Wang Q N.(2020-10-22)[2022-08-09].Interview with Xiang Biao:Involution is competition that don'allow failure and exit[EB/OL].https://www.thepaper.cn/news Detail_forward_9648585.(in Chinese)

贝克·乌尔里希.2001a.再造政治:自反性现代化理论初探[M]//贝克·乌尔里希,吉登斯·安东尼,拉什·斯科特.自反性现代化:现代社会秩序中的政治、传统与美学.赵文书,译.北京:商务印书馆,4-71.

贝克·乌尔里希.2001b.何谓工业社会的自我消解和自我威胁?[M]//贝克·乌尔里希,吉登斯·安东尼,拉什·斯科特.自反性现代化:现代社会秩序中的政治、传统与美学,赵文书,译.北京:商务印书馆,221-226.

Abbott A.1981.Status and status strain in the professions[J].American Journal of Sociology,86(4):819-835.

Baldwin M.2018.Scientific autonomy,public accountability,and the rise of“peer review”in the Cold War United States[J].Isis,109(3):538-558.

Burawoy M.2005.For public sociology[J].American Sociological Review,70(1):4-28.

Graeber D,Wengrow D.2021.The dawn of everything:A new history of humanity[M].New York:Farrar,Straus and Giroux.

Khurana R.2007.From higher aims to hired hands:The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Osterloh M,Frey B S.2020.How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia[J].Research Policy,49(1):103831.

Parsons T.1986.Social science:A basic national resource[M]//Klausner S Z,Lidz V M.The Nationalization of the Social Sciences.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.

Prichard F P.1892.The study of the science of municipal government[J].The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2(4):18-25.

Raadschelders J C N,Lee K H.2011.Trends in the study of public administration:Empirical and qualitative observations from public administration review,2000-2009[J].Public Administration Review,71(1):19-33.

Rawls J.1996.Political liberalism[M].New York:Columbia University Press.

Shenhav Y.1995.From chaos to systems:The engineering foundations of organization theory,1879-1932[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,40(4):557-585.

Story L.2007-09-16.Bye,bye B-School[N].The New York Times.

Tsang E W K,Frey B S.2007.The as-is journal review process:Let authors own their ideas[J].Academy of Management Learning&Education,6(1):128-136.

Vocino T,Elliott R H.1984.Research note:Public administration journal prestige:A time series analysis[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,29(1):43-51.

Willmott H.2011.Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship:Reactivity and the ABS list[J].Organization,18(4):429-442.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G642.3;D035-4;C93-4

引用信息:

[1]张乾友.社会科学的自反性合法化:以美国工商管理学与公共行政学为例[J].公共管理评论,2022,4(04):179-193.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“社会科学影响公共政策的历史、机制与中国路径研究”(项目批准号:21&ZD174)资助

发布时间:

2022-10-18

出版时间:

2022-10-18

网络发布时间:

2022-10-18

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索