nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.8 23-43
“静默动员”:隐性运动式治理及其运作机制研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“监管模式对公务员使用生成式人工智能行为的影响及机制研究”(项目批准号:72574125); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党城市治理理论与实践”(项目批准号:24&ZD146)的资助
邮箱(Email): syp09252022@163.com;
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-08-11
出版时间: 2026-08-11
网络发布时间: 2026-08-11
移动端阅读
摘要:

近年来,运动式治理作为中国基层治理的重要实践形态,并未随制度化与常态化推进而消退,而是在传播数字化、风险社会化、考核指标化和舆论自由化的环境中,逐渐演化为一种低可见度、去公开化的隐性治理形态。本文以山东省N县农村集体“三资”整治为案例,从制度压力、社会风险和传播环境三重维度构建分析框架,探讨隐性运动式治理的生成逻辑、运作机制与实践结果。研究发现,N县农村集体“三资”整治在推进过程中呈现出区别于传统运动式治理的动员方式:传统模式依赖大规模宣传与显性动员,而隐性运动式治理则通过控制信息传递的范围、节奏与对象,形成以“点对点”传递和“先易后难”推进为主要表现的操作静默化策略。

Abstract:

In recent years campaign-style governance has remained a pivotal practice in China's grassroots administration. Rather than receding under the drive toward institutionalisation and routine operation, it has gradually evolved—within an environment characterised by digitalised information dissemination, the socialisation of risk, metric-driven performance assessment, and a more open public discourse—into a low-visibility, de-publicised form that we refer to as implicit campaign governance. This paper examines the rectification of rural collective “three assets”(funds, assets and resources) in N County, Shandong Province as a case study. Drawing on an analytical framework that integrates institutional pressure, social risk, and communication environment, we explore the generative logic, operational mechanisms, and practical outcomes of this implicit form of governance. The findings show that the three-asset rectification in N County employs a mobilisation mode distinct from traditional campaigns: conventional approaches depend on large-scale publicity and overt mobilisation, whereas implicit campaign governance controls the scope, tempo, and target audience of information flow, adopting a point-to-point “first easy, then difficult” silent strategy.

参考文献

安永军.2022.常规治理与运动式治理的纵向协同机制[J].北京社会科学,(2):120-128.An Y J.2022.The vertical coordination mechanism of conventional governance and campaign-style governance[J].Social Sciences of Beijing,(2):120-128.(in Chinese)

包国强,黄诚,万震安.2020.“网络失智”:智能传播时代网络舆论监督的“智效”反思[J].湖北社会科学,(8):161-168.Bao G Q,Huang C,Wan Z A.2020.“Network dementia”:Reflection on the“intelligence effect”of online public opinion supervision in the era of intelligent communication[J].Hubei Social Sciences,(8):161-168.(in Chinese)

陈潭.2006.政策动员、政策认同与信任政治---以中国人事档案制度的推行为考察对象[J].南京社会科学,(5):65-71.Chen T.2006.Policy mobilization,policy identification and trust politics:Taking the implementation of China's personnel file system as an example[J].Social Sciences in Nanjing,(5):65-71.(in Chinese)

狄金华.2019.“权力-利益”与行动伦理:基层政府政策动员的多重逻辑---基于农地确权政策执行的案例分析[J].社会学研究,34(4):122-145,244-245.Di J H.2019.Power,interest and ethics of action:Multiple logics of policy mobilization in grassroots government-A case study of the implementation of the rural land-use rights confirmation policy[J].Sociological Studies,34(4):122-145,244-245.(in Chinese)

冯仕政.2011.中国国家运动的形成与变异:基于政体的整体性解释[J].开放时代,(1):73-97.Feng S Z.2011.The formation and variation of state campaigns in post-1949 China:Aregime model[J].Open Times,(1):73-97.(in Chinese)

黄科.2013.运动式治理:基于国内研究文献的述评[J].中国行政管理,(10):107-112.Huang K.2013.China mobilized governance:The commentary of domestic research literatures[J].Chinese Public Administration,(10):107-112.(in Chinese)

姜雅婷,杜焱强.2023.中央生态环保督察如何生成地方生态环境治理成效?---基于岱海湖治理的长时段过程追踪[J].管理世界,39(11):133-151,8.Jiang Y T,Du Y Q.2023.How does the central ecological and environmental protection inspection generate local eco-environmental governance effects?A long-term processtracing based on the governance practices of Daihai Lake[J].Journal of Management World,39(11):133-151,8.(in Chinese)

金晓雨,孔繁斌.2022.从运动到常规:地方政府环境治理的转型及其内在机理---以A市环保督察整改工作为例[J].江汉论坛,(9):59-64.Jin X Y,Kong F B.2022.From movement to routine:Transformation of local governmental environmental governance and its inner logic-Taking environmental supervision rectification work of A city as the case[J].Jianghan Tribune,(9):59-64.(in Chinese)

赖志杰.2024.强政治势能下的运动式治理及其常规化转型---基于全国农村低保专项治理的研究[J].公共管理学报,21(4):88-98,171.Lai Z J.2024.Campaign-style governance and its conventional transformation under strong political momentum-Research on the national special governance for rural subsistence allowance[J].Journal of Public Management,21(4):88-98,171.(in Chinese)

林海彬.2025.精细化动员:基层治理中政策执行力的生产机制研究---基于L街道生活垃圾分类政策实施的实证分析[J].湖北社会科学,(6):127-135.Lin H B.2025.Precision mobilization mechanisms for policy implementation capacity in grassroots governance:An empirical analysis of waste-sorting policy in L subdistrict[J].Hubei Social Sciences,(6):127-135.(in Chinese)

刘骥,熊彩.2015.解释政策变通:运动式治理中的条块关系[J].公共行政评论,8(6):88-112,187.Liu J,Xiong C.2015.Explaining China's policy deformation:Tiao/Kuai authority relations under campaign-style governance[J].Journal of Public Administration,8(6):88-112,187.(in Chinese)

刘开君.2019.运动式治理的运行逻辑与现代化转型---基于中国式官僚制组织视角的整体性探析[J].江汉论坛,(7):73-79.Liu K J.2019.Operating logic of mobilized governance and modernization transformation[J].Jianghan Tribune,(7):73-79.(in Chinese)

吕萍,胡元瑞.2020.人情式政策动员:宗族型村庄中的国家基层治理逻辑---基于江西省余江县宅改案例的分析[J].公共管理学报,17(3):150-163,176.Lyu P,Hu Y R.2020.Policy mobilization based on human relationship:Logic of national grass-roots level governance in clan-based villages-Analysis on the case of homestead system reform in Yujiang County,Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Public Management,17(3):150-163,176.(in Chinese)

倪星,原超.2014.地方政府的运动式治理是如何走向“常规化”的?---基于S市市监局“清无”专项行动的分析[J].公共行政评论,7(2):70-96,171-172.Ni X,Yuan C.2014.How local government campaign-style governance become routinized?-A case study for special action[J].Journal of Public Administration,7(2):70-96,171-172.(in Chinese)

欧阳静.2014.论基层运动型治理---兼与周雪光等商榷[J].开放时代,(6):180-190,9.Ouyang J.2014.On campaign-styled governance at the grassroots level:A discussion with Zhou Xueguang[J].Open Times,(6):180-190,9.(in Chinese)

潘泽泉,任杰.2020.从运动式治理到常态治理:基层社会治理转型的中国实践[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),34(3):110-116.Pan Z Q,Ren J.2020.From campaign-style governance to conventional governance:The practice and experience of grass-roots social governance in China[J].Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences),34(3):110-116.(in Chinese)

彭勃,杨志军.2013.从“凝闭”走向“参与”---公共事件冲击下的政策体制转向[J].探索与争鸣,(9):52-56.Peng B,Yang Z J.2013.From closure to participation:The shift of policy system under the impact of public events[J].Exploration and Free Views,(9):52-56.(in Chinese)

唐皇凤.2007.常态社会与运动式治理---中国社会治安治理中的“严打”政策研究[J].开放时代,(3):115-129.Tang H F.2007.Campaign-styled management of normal society[J].Open Times,(3):115-129.(in Chinese)

王诗宗,罗凤鹏.2020.基层政策动员:推动社区居民参与的可能路径[J].南京社会科学,(4):63-71.Wang S Z,Luo F P.2020.Grassroots policy mobilization:A new way to facilitate residents'participation[J].Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences,(4):63-71.(in Chinese)

文宏,崔铁.2015.运动式治理中的层级协同:实现机制与内在逻辑---一项基于内容分析的研究[J].公共行政评论,8(6):113-133,187-188.Wen H,Cui T.2015.Implementation mechanism and inherent logic of hierarchical cooperation in campaign-style governance:Based on content analysis[J].Journal of Public Administration,8(6):113-133,187-188.(in Chinese)

文宏,郝郁青.2017.运动式治理中资源调配的要素组合与实现逻辑---以武汉市创建“全国文明城市”活动为例[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),38(6):38-46.Wen H,Hao Y Q.2017.Element composition and logical realization of resource allocation in mobilized governance-Based on the governance in Wuhan in creating“National Civilized City”[J].Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition),38(6):38-46.(in Chinese)

文宏,杜菲菲.2021.借势赋能:“常规”嵌入“运动”的一个解释性框架---基于A市“创文”与营商环境优化工作的考察[J].中国行政管理,(3):100-106.Wen H,Du F F.2021.Empower by the trends:An explanation framework of“Regular Governance”embedded in the“Campaign-Style Governance”-Based on the research of creating a national civilized city practice and optimizing business environment practice in city A[J].Chinese Public Administration,(3):100-106.(in Chinese)

向淼.2024.运动式治理:一种中国特色的动员机制[J].治理研究,40(3):24-33,157.Xiang M.2024.The campaign-style governance:A mobilization mechanism with Chinese characteristics[J].Governance Studies,40(3):24-33,157.(in Chinese)

向淼,郁建兴.2020.运动式治理的法治化---基于领导小组执法行为变迁的个案分析[J].东南学术,(2):125-135,247.Xiang M,Yu J X.2020.Rule of law in mobilized governance-Case analysis based on behavioral changes of leading group in law enforcement[J].Southeast Academic Research,(2):125-135,247.(in Chinese)

向淼,郁建兴.2024.运动式治理的长效化:短期性中心工作何以嵌入长期发展战略?[J].经济社会体制比较,(1):127-137.Xiang M,Yu J X.2024.Sustaining campaign-style governance:Integrating short-term central initiatives into long-term developmental strategies[J].Comparative Economic and Social Systems,(1):127-137.(in Chinese)

徐岩,范娜娜,陈那波.2015.合法性承载:对运动式治理及其转变的新解释---以A市18年创卫历程为例[J].公共行政评论,8(2):22-46,179.Xu Y,Fan N N,Chen N B.2015.Legitimacy loading:A new explanation for the political campaign in China-18 years of“Creating a National Sanitary City”in a Chinese city[J].Journal of Public Administration,8(2):22-46,179.(in Chinese)

杨帆.2023.网格化政策动员:塑造基层治理新格局的实践特征、行政价值与议题创新[J].南京社会科学,(5):72-79,93.Yang F.2023.Grid-based policy mobilization:The practical features,administrative value,and topic innovation in shaping a new pattern of grassroots governance[J].Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences,(5):72-79,93.(in Chinese)

杨志军.2015.运动式治理悖论:常态治理的非常规化---基于网络“扫黄打非”运动分析[J].公共行政评论,8(2):47-72,180.Yang Z J.2015.Campaign-style governance paradox:Normal governance with unconventional characteristics-Based on an analysis of the internet anti-pornography movement[J].Journal of Public Administration,8(2):47-72,180.(in Chinese)

杨志军,彭勃.2013.有限否定与类型化承认:评判运动式治理的价值取向[J].社会科学,(3):15-24.Yang Z J,Peng B.2013.Limited negation and typological recognition:The value judgment orientation of campaign-style governance[J].Journal of Social Sciences,(3):15-24.(in Chinese)

于琴.2021.监督话语与政治过程:重大突发性公共卫生事件应对中的舆论监督---以“云监工”的监督话语分析为例[J].重庆社会科学,(3):94-103.Yu Q.2021.Supervisory discourse and political process:Public opinion supervision in response to major public health emergencies-An analysis of supervision discourse of“cloud supervisor”[J].Chongqing Social Sciences,(3):94-103.(in Chinese)

张莲明,胡春艳,江沛霖.2025.“战时”话语如何促进政策执行认同?---基于C县领导讲话的话语分析[J].公共管理学报,22(2):49-59,170.Zhang L M,Hu C Y,Jiang P L.2025.How do“Wartime”discourses promote acceptance of policy implementation?-A discourse analysis of speeches by leaders in county C[J].Journal of Public Management,22(2):49-59,170.(in Chinese)

周黎安.2007.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,42(7):36-50.Zhou L A.2007.Governing China's local officials:An analysis of promotion tournament model[J].Economic Research Journal,42(7):36-50.(in Chinese)

周黎安.2022.行政发包制与中国特色的国家能力[J].开放时代,(4):28-50,5-6.Zhou L A.2022.Administrative contracting system and state capacity with Chinese characteristics[J].Open Times,(4):28-50,5-6.(in Chinese)

周雪光.2008.基层政府间的“共谋现象”---一个政府行为的制度逻辑[J].社会学研究,(6):1-21,243.Zhou X G.2008.Collusion among local governments:The institutional logic of a government behavior[J].Sociological Studies,(6):1-21,243.(in Chinese)

周雪光.2011.权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,(10):67-85.Zhou X G.2011.Authoritarian system and effective governance:The institutional logic of contemporary Chinese state governance[J].Open Times,(10):67-85.(in Chinese)

周雪光.2012.运动型治理机制:中国国家治理的制度逻辑再思考[J].开放时代,(9):105-125.Zhou X G.2012.Campaign-style governance mechanism:Rethinking the institutional logic of China's state governance[J].Open Times,(9):105-125.(in Chinese)

(1)“三资整治”即针对农村集体资金、资产、资源的专项治理,主要任务是清理村级账目、审核合同协议、核查集体资产使用情况,有效防范农村集体“三资”流失。

(2)访谈资料编码规则:被访谈者层级+访谈日期+访谈对象编号,被访谈者层级分为县级(C)、镇级(Z)、村级(E)。如“访谈编码C2024112803”含义为:2024 年11月28日对编号为03的N县干部进行的访谈。

基本信息:

中图分类号:D630;F321.32

引用信息:

[1]孙宗锋,石艳平.“静默动员”:隐性运动式治理及其运作机制研究[J].公共管理评论,2026,8(03):23-43.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“监管模式对公务员使用生成式人工智能行为的影响及机制研究”(项目批准号:72574125); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党城市治理理论与实践”(项目批准号:24&ZD146)的资助

发布时间:

2026-08-11

出版时间:

2026-08-11

网络发布时间:

2026-08-11

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索