nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.8 173-201
灵活就业人员养老保险参保意愿提升的行为助推策略研究
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“人民政协与国家治理体系研究”(项目批准号:19JZD026); 贵州中医药大学博士启动基金“政策助推提升灵活就业人员养老保险参保意愿的机制与路径研究”(项目批准号:贵中医博士启动[2026]16号); 华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“乡村数字治理参与机制优化研究”(项目批准号:CGPY202407); 华南师范大学哲学社会科学重大培育项目“我国乡村产业振兴财政扶持政策绩效产出、共同富裕效应及优化路径研究”(项目批准号:ZDPY2406)的资助
邮箱(Email): yingyinghan@126.com;
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-04-22
出版时间: 2026-04-22
网络发布时间: 2026-04-22
移动端阅读
摘要:

随着灵活就业的发展,该群体的养老保障问题日益凸显,但现有养老保险政策的覆盖广度与保障效果均不尽如人意。本研究立足行为公共政策视角,探讨助推策略对提升灵活就业人员基本养老保险参保意愿的有效性及作用机制。研究采用2×2×2组间情境实验设计,考察养老保险重要性认知、政策理解度对参保意愿的影响,构建多元化政策情境并呈现实验材料,检验默认选项、流程简化和描述性规范等助推工具的作用机制。结果发现:(1)养老保险重要性认知、政策理解度与参保意愿间存在显著正向关系,且政策理解度发挥中介作用;(2)默认选项感知度和流程复杂度对基准中介模型产生调节作用,而描述性规范感知度的调节作用不显著;(3)默认选项感知度与流程复杂度交互项的协同效应主要作用于参保意愿认知加工的前端环节。本研究验证了助推策略在提升灵活就业人员参保意愿方面的有效性,为优化相关政策提供了实证依据,并建议政策制定者考虑不同群体的社会经济变量差异,设计个性化助推策略以提高不同群体的参保意愿。

Abstract:

As China's economic structure transforms and employment patterns diversify, the flexible employment population has expanded to approximately 200 million, accounting for over 40% of the total urban employment. However, this group faces significantly lower pension insurance participation rates due to income instability, insufficient confidence in insurance benefits, and lack of organizational support. Drawing on behavioral public policy theory, this study investigates the effectiveness and mechanisms of nudge strategies in enhancing flexible workers' willingness to participate in basic pension insurance.An analytical framework is constructed with perceived importance of pension insurance as the independent variable, policy comprehension as the mediator, and participation willingness as the dependent variable, with three nudge strategies—default options, procedural simplification, and descriptive norms—as moderators. A 2×2×2 between-subjects scenario experiment was conducted from June to August 2024, collecting 742 valid responses from flexible workers across 15 provinces in China. Participants were randomly assigned to eight experimental conditions and exposed to simulated pension policy materials. A pre-post test design measured changes in participation willingness on five-point Likert scales, with manipulation checks confirming all three experimental manipulations were effective.The findings reveal several key results. First, perceived importance significantly and positively predicts participation willingness. Second, policy comprehension mediates this relationship, though the mediation effect accounts for only 3.9% of the total effect, suggesting a “dual-pathway” model: a dominant intuitive pathway where importance recognition directly drives participation willingness, and a weaker rational pathway mediated by policy comprehension. Third, default options exhibit complex moderation-positively moderating the direct path from perceived importance to participation willingness, yet negatively moderating the path from policy comprehension to participation willingness, suggesting a “cognitive offloading” mechanism. Fourth, procedural simplification moderates only the direct path, functioning as a “cognitive tax” reducer. Fifth, descriptive norms fail to produce significant moderating effects, attributable to the lack of observable peer behavior and absence of stable reference networks among flexible workers. Sixth, the interaction between default options and procedural simplification produces a synergistic effect at the cognitive transformation stage(perceived importance-policy comprehension), indicating that combined nudges optimize cognitive resource allocation in early decision-making phases.Theoretically, this study extends nudge theory to non-standard employment social security, revealing that flexible workers' decisions are primarily attitude-driven rather than knowledge-driven. Practically, policymakers should prioritize enhancing recognition of pension insurance's long-term value while combining default enrollment with streamlined procedures to reduce cognitive barriers. Future research should employ multi-item scales, explore heterogeneity across employment subtypes, and investigate optimal nudge-traditional policy combinations.

参考文献

傅承哲,张书维.2023.行为向“善”:行为公共管理视野下公共政策的助推机制[J].中国公共政策评论,24(2):1-21.Fu C Z,Zhang S W.2023.Behavior towards“Goodness”:The“Nudging”mechanism of public policy in the perspective of behavioral public administration[J].Chinese Public Policy Review,24(2):1-21.(in Chinese)

李红艳,杨创豪,陈志浩.2023.上海灵活就业人员养老保险制度改革发展报告[M]//汪泓,史健勇,吴忠,等.上海社会保障改革与发展报告(2023).北京:社会科学文献出版社:129-142.Li H Y,Yang C H,Chen Z H.2023.Report on the reform and development of the pension insurance system for flexible employment personnel in Shanghai[M]//Wang H,Shi J Y,Wu Z,et al.Shanghai Social Security Reform and Development Report (2023).Beijing:Social Science Academic Press:129-142.(in Chinese)

李力行.2023.数字经济、灵活就业与公共服务变革[J].社会治理,(4):4-11.Li L X.2023.Digital economy,flexible employment,and transformation of public service[J].Social Governance Review,(4):4-11.(in Chinese)

李强,厉昌习,岳书铭.2018.长期照护保险制度试点方案的比较与思考---基于全国15个试点地区的比较分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),20(2):23-30.Li Q,Li C X,Yue S M.2018.Comparison and thinking of pilot programs of long-term care insurance system-Based on comparative and analysis of 15 pilot areas in the country[J].Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition),20(2):23-30.(in Chinese)

刘欢,隋晓阳,黄元娜,等.2019.行为经济学在养老储蓄领域的助推应用[J].心理科学进展,27(3):417-427.Liu H,Sui X Y,Huang Y N,et al.2019.The nudging role of behavioral economics in retirement savings decisions:Current situation and future prospects[J].Advances in Psychological Science,27(3):417-427.(in Chinese)

罗伟铭.2021.助推策略视角下的应急管理政策工具优化研究---以新冠肺炎疫情防控若干个案为例[D].昆明:云南大学.Luo W M.2021.Study on the optimization of emergency management policy tools from the perspective of the Nudge-Base on some cases of the prevention and control of the COVID-19 as examples[D].Kunming:Yunnan University.(in Chinese)

潘文浩.2025.政策助推对灵活就业人员养老保险参保意愿的影响研究[D].广州:华南理工大学.Pan W H.2025.Research on the influence of policy nudges on pension insurance participation willingness among flexible employment workers[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology.(in Chinese)

任兵,陈志霞,蒋林秀.2024.政策情境与工具选择:行为助推何以促进政策创新[J].公共行政评论,17(4):154-176.Ren B,Chen Z X,Jiang L X.2024.Policy context and tool choice:A government-people interaction perspective on how behavioral nudge promotes policy innovation[J].Journal of Public Administration,17(4):154-176.(in Chinese)

沈坤荣,张锐敏.2024.平台经济对灵活就业者收入和主观福利的影响研究[J].经济与管理研究,45(11):86-103.Shen K R,Zhang R M.2024.Impact of the platform economy on the income and subjective welfare of flexible employees[J].Research on Economics and Management,45(11):86-103.(in Chinese)

孙小琳.2019.灵活就业人员纳入城镇职工基本养老保险的现实困境及纾困之道[J].劳动保障世界,(24):21-24.Sun X L.2019.The realistic dilemma and relief measures of flexible employment personnel being included in the basic pension insurance for urban employees[J].Labor Security World,(24):21-24.(in Chinese)

王新军,郑超.2020.退休政策对中国居民消费及主观福利的影响[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(2):117-131.Wang X J,Zheng C.2020.The impact of retirement policy on Chinese residents'consumption and subjective wellbeing[J].Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),(2):117-131.(in Chinese)

汪彦,魏雨捷,张书维.2023.描述性规范对流感疫苗接种意愿的影响:风险感知的中介和参照群体的调节[J].公共管理评论,5(2):138-161.Wang Y,Wei Y J,Zhang S W.2023.Descriptive norms and willingness to be vaccinated:The mediating role of risk perceptions and the moderating effect of reference groups[J].China Public Administration Review,5(2):138-161.(in Chinese)

吴晶晶.2023.新业态灵活就业人员基本养老保险参保意愿及影响因素研究---以X市饿了么骑手为例[D].杭州:浙江工业大学.Wu J J.2023.Research on the willingness and influencing factors of social endowment insurance participation among employees in new business formats:Taking the delivery riders of Ele.Me in X City as an example[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University of Technology.(in Chinese)

新华社.(2021-03-13)[2026-01-21].中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.

殷仪.2021.灵活就业人员参与基本养老保险问题研究:文献综述[J].中国高校人文社会科学信息网,1(1):1-15.Yin Y.2021.Research on the participation of flexible employment personnel in basic pension insurance:Literature review[J].China University Humanities and Social Sciences Information Network,1(1):1-15.(in Chinese)

岳爱,杨矗,常芳,等.2013.新型农村社会养老保险对家庭日常费用支出的影响[J].管理世界,(8):101-108.Yue A,Yang C,Chang F,et al.2013.The impact of the new rural social pension insurance on daily household expenses[J].Journal of Management World,(8):101-108.(in Chinese)

张书维,郭晟豪.2021.行为公共管理研究中的公共组织行为问题:最新代表性研究及探讨[J].公共管理评论,3(3):160-184.Zhang S W,Guo S H.2021.Research on public organizational behavior in the field of behavioral public administration[J].China Public Administration Review,3(3):160-184.(in Chinese)

赵建国,周德水.2020.灵活就业流动人口的养老保险覆盖率及其收入效应[J].社会保障评论,4(2):29-42.Zhao J G,Zhou D S.2020.Coverage rate and income effect of pension insurance on the migrant population in flexible employment[J].Chinese Social Security Review,4(2):29-42.(in Chinese)

中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部.(2024-09-25)[2026-01-21].人社部:“四条措施”,促进灵活就业和新就业形态劳动者权益保障[EB/OL].https://www.mohrss.gov.cn/SYrlzyhshbzb/dongtaixinwen/buneiyaowen/rsxw/202409/t20240925_526439.html.

Ajzen I.1991.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2):179-211.

Ando A,Modigliani F.1963.The“life cycle”hypothesis of saving:Aggregate implications and tests[J].The American Economic Review,53(1):55-84.

Asch S E.1956.Studies of independence and conformity:I.A minority of one against a unanimous majority[J].Psychological Monographs:General and Applied,70(9):1-70.

Beshears J,Choi J J,Laibson D,et al.2009.The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes:Evidence from the United States[M]//Brown J R,Liebman J B,Wise D A.Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment.Chicago:University of Chicago Press:167-198.

Beshears J,Choi J J,Laibson D,et al.2013.Simplification and saving[J].Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,95:130-145.

Bhargava S,Manoli D.2015.Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits:Evidence from an IRS field experiment[J].American Economic Review,105(11):3489-3529.

Bicchieri C,Dimant E.2022.Nudging with care:The risks and benefits of social information[J].Public Choice,191(3/4):443-464.

Burnkrant R E,Cousineau A.1975.Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2(3):206-215.

Byambaa M,Yamada K.2023.Descriptive social norms and herders'social insurance participation in Mongolia:A survey experiment[J].Journal of International Development,35(1):143-162.

Carroll G D,Choi J J,Laibson D,et al.2009.Optimal defaults and active decisions[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,124(4):1639-1674.

Chernev A,Böckenholt U,Goodman J.2015.Choice overload:A conceptual review and metaanalysis[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology,25(2):333-358.

Chou K L,Yu K M,Chan W S,et al.2015.Perceived retirement savings adequacy in Hong Kong:An interdisciplinary financial planning model[J].Ageing&Society,35 (8):1565-1586.

Cialdini R B,Goldstein N J.2004.Social influence:Compliance and conformity[J].Annual Review of Psychology,55(1):591-621.

Coleman J S.1990.Foundations of social theory[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

De Ridder D,Kroese F,van Gestel L.2022.Nudgeability:Mapping conditions of susceptibility to nudge influence[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,17 (2):346-359.

Dinner I,Johnson E J,Goldstein D G,et al.2011.Partitioning default effects:Why people choose not to choose[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,17(4):332-341.

Domurat R,Menashe I,Yin W.2021.The role of behavioral frictions in health insurance marketplace enrollment and risk:Evidence from a field experiment[J].American Economic Review,111(5):1549-1574.

Edwards W.1954.The theory of decision making[J].Psychological Bulletin,51 (4):380-417.

Eeckhoudt L,Gollier C,Schlesinger H.2005.Economic and financial decisions under risk[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Fellner G,Sausgruber R,Traxler C.2013.Testing enforcement strategies in the field:Threat,moral appeal and social information[J].Journal of the European Economic Association,11(3):634-660.

Furnham A,Boo H C.2011.A literature review of the anchoring effect[J].The Journal of Socio-Economics,40(1):35-42.

Gerber A S,Rogers T.2009.Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote:Everybody's voting and so should you[J].The Journal of Politics,71(1):178-191.

Goldstein N J,Cialdini R B,Griskevicius V.2008.A room with a viewpoint:Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels[J].Journal of Consumer Research,35(3):472-482.

Hastie R,Dawes R M.2010.Rational choice in an uncertain world:The psychology of judgment and decision making[M].2nd ed.Thousand Oaks:Sage.

Herd P,De Leire T,Harvey H,et al.2013.Shifting administrative burden to the state:The case of medicaid take-up[J].Public Administration Review,73(S1):S69-S81.

Johnson E J,Hassin R,Baker T,et al.2013.Can consumers make affordable care affordable?The value of choice architecture[J].PLoS ONE,8(12):e81521.

Kahneman D.2011.Thinking,fast and slow[M].New York:Farrar,Straus and Giroux:499.

Loewenstein G,Bryce C,Hagmann D,et al.2015.Warning:You are about to be nudged[J].Behavioral Science&Policy,1(1):35-42.

Long Z Y,Niu J L,Yi F.2024.Driving factors and micro-mechanism of residents'participation intention in individual pension system[J].Heliyon,10(2):e24488.

Lusardi A,Mitchell O S.2017.How ordinary consumers make complex economic decisions:Financial literacy and retirement readiness[J].The Quarterly Journal of Finance,7(3):1750008.

Mani A,Mullainathan S,Shafir E,et al.2013.Poverty impedes cognitive function[J].Science,341(6149):976-980.

McKenzie C R M,Liersch M J,Finkelstein S R.2006.Recommendations implicit in policy defaults[J].Psychological Science,17(5):414-420.

Mullainathan S,Shafir E.2013.Scarcity:Why having too little means so much[M].New York:Times Books.

Oliver A.2019.Towards a new political economy of behavioral public policy[J].Public Administration Review,79(6):917-924.

Paas F,Renkl A,Sweller J.2004.Cognitive load theory:Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture[J].Instructional Science,32(1/2):1-8.

Petty R E,Cacioppo J T.1986.The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion[M]//Berkowitz L.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.New York:Academic Press,19:123-205.

Pocheptsova A,Amir O,Dhar R,et al.2009.Deciding without resources:Resource depletion and choice in context[J].Journal of Marketing Research,46(3):344-355.

Ryan R M,Deci E L.2000.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,social development,and well-being[J].American Psychologist,55 (1):68-78.

Shah A K,Mullainathan S,Shafir E.2012.Some consequences of having too little[J].Science,338(6107):682-685.

Shu S B,Gneezy A.2010.Procrastination of enjoyable experiences[J].Journal of Marketing Research,47(5):933-944.

Steward G,Looi V,Chib V S.2025.The Neurobiology of Cognitive Fatigue and Its Influence on Effort-Based Choice[J].Journal of Neuroscience,45(24):e1612242025.

Terry D J,Hogg M A.1996.Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship:A role for group identification[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22(8):776-793.

Vohs K D,Schmeichel B J,Lohmann S,et al.2021.A multisite preregistered paradigmatic test of the ego-depletion effect[J].Psychological Science,32(10):1566-1581.

Wang Y,Zhang S W,Zhang J F.2026.The impact of descriptive social norms on coproduction:How communication frames matter[J].Public Management Review,28(3):678-704.

基本信息:

中图分类号:F842.67;F249.2

引用信息:

[1]潘文浩,张强,韩莹莹.灵活就业人员养老保险参保意愿提升的行为助推策略研究[J].公共管理评论,2026,8(02):173-201.

基金信息:

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“人民政协与国家治理体系研究”(项目批准号:19JZD026); 贵州中医药大学博士启动基金“政策助推提升灵活就业人员养老保险参保意愿的机制与路径研究”(项目批准号:贵中医博士启动[2026]16号); 华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“乡村数字治理参与机制优化研究”(项目批准号:CGPY202407); 华南师范大学哲学社会科学重大培育项目“我国乡村产业振兴财政扶持政策绩效产出、共同富裕效应及优化路径研究”(项目批准号:ZDPY2406)的资助

发布时间:

2026-04-22

出版时间:

2026-04-22

网络发布时间:

2026-04-22

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索