张乾友

• 1:南京大学政府管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

测量是组织生活的一部分，当代组织正在试图将一切组织活动都纳入测量之中。测量范围的不断扩张，隐含了一种关于组织合理化与社会进步的假设：通过测量，所有人在组织中的实际贡献都将得到精准呈现，其结果既能助力个人的自我提升，也能优化组织的资源分配机制；进而，每个人都基于测量结果来寻找自己的不足、改进自己的工作，最终推动组织与社会效率的提升；组织基于测量结果来分配资源，使内部资源的分配更加公平。当所有组织的内部分配都更加公平，结果就是促进了社会公平。但在实践中，测量并未带来上述效果。由于测量的本质在于侵占，它反而引发测量对象普遍的反侵占行为，使得组织生活变成侵占与反侵占的持续斗争。

关键词(KeyWords)： 测量;绩效管理;侵占;反侵占

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重点项目“国家治理中的非预期结果及其应对研究”(项目批准号:23AZZ013)的资助

作者(Author): 张乾友

参考文献(References)：

• 埃伦·拉佩尔·谢尔.2021.工作：巨变时代的现状、挑战与未来[M].秦晨，译.北京：北京时代华文书局.
• 哈特穆特·罗萨.2022.不受掌控[M].郑作彧，马欣，译.上海：上海人民出版社.
• 刘玉姝，王东方.2019.5篇SCI论文事件引发的论文不当署名问题的思考[J].学报编辑论丛，(1):370-374.Liu Y S,Wang D F.2019.Reflections on inappropriate attribution of papers triggered by the incident of five SCI papers[J].Journal Editors Series,(1):370-374.(in Chinese)
• 迈克尔·布若威.2008.制造同意：垄断资本主义劳动过程的变迁[M].李荣荣，译.北京：商务印书馆.
• 尚虎平.2008.我国地方政府绩效评估悖论：高绩效下的政治安全隐患[J].管理世界，(4):69-79.Shang H P.2008.The paradox of local government performance evaluation in China:Political security hazards under high performance[J].Journal of Management World,(4):69-79.(in Chinese)
• 泰罗 F W.1984.科学管理原理[M].胡隆昶，冼子恩，曹丽顺，译.北京：中国社会科学出版社.Taylor F W.1984.The principles of scientific management[M].Hu L C,Xian Z E,Cao L S,trans.Beijing:China Social Sciences Press.(in Chinese)
• 涂文燕，公婷.2022.控制型问责可否有效遏制避责行为?——基于官员行为与制度规范的内在逻辑分析[J].行政论坛，29(5):52-60.Tu W Y,Gong T.2022.Can control-based accountability effectively prevent blame avoidance?—An analysis of the inner logic of official behavior and institutional regulation[J].Administrative Tribune,29(5):52-60.(in Chinese)
• 张乾友.2022a.问责、透明化与当代政府的责任困境[J].公共行政评论，15(6):4-20.Zhang Q Y.2022a.Accountability,transparency and the responsibility dilemma of contemporary government[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(6):4-20.(in Chinese)
• 张乾友.2022b.问责与责任化：官僚组织的责任悖论[J].浙江学刊，(1):63-71.Zhang Q Y.2022b.Accountability and responsibilization:The responsibility paradox of bureaucratic organizations[J].Zhejiang Academic Journal,(1):63-71.(in Chinese)
• 张乾友.2023.重思协作关系中的个体绩效与集体绩效——兼论实现社会公平的管理路径[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),59(1):98-108.Zhang Q Y.2023.Rethinking individual performance and collective performance in collaborations—On the management path to achieve social equality[J].Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),59(1):98-108.(in Chinese)
• 赵聚军，张昊辰.2022.被动担责与集体共谋：基层官员问责应对策略的类型学考察[J].江苏社会科学，(1):125-136.Zhao J J,Zhang H C.2022.Passive responsibility and collective collusion:A typological study of the accountability coping strategies of grassroots-level officials[J].Jiangsu Social Sciences,(1):125-136.(in Chinese)
• 周志忍，徐艳晴.2018.政府绩效评估中的博弈行为及其致因：来自中国的证据[J].国家治理现代化研究，(1):211-232.Zhou Z R,Xu Y Q.2018.Exploring gaming strategies and motivations in government performance measurement:Evidence from China[J].Research on Modernization of State Governance,(1):211-232.(in Chinese)
• Ajana B.2017.Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self[J].Digital Health,3:2055207616689509.
• Bevan G,Hood C.2006.What's measured is what matters:Targets and gaming in the English public health care system[J].Public Administration,84(3):517-538.
• Bowman J S.2010.The success of failure:The paradox of performance pay[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,30(1):70-88.
• Chakraborty J,Pradhan D K,Nandi S.2022.Research misconduct and citation gaming:A critical review on characterization and recent trends of research manipulation[C]//Data Management,Analytics and Innovation:Proceedings of ICDMAI 2021,Volume 2.Singapore:Springer,485-492.
• Ferlie E,McGivern G.2014.Bringing anglo-governmentality into public management scholarship:The case of evidence-based medicine in UK health care[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,24(1):59-83.
• Gillespie R.1993.Manufacturing knowledge:A history of the Hawthorne experiments[M].New York:Cambridge University Press.
• Graeber D.2015.The utopia of rules:On technology,stupidity,and the secret joys of bureaucracy[M].London:Melville House.
• Homans G C.2017.The human group[M].New York:Routledge.
• Kipnis A B.2008.Audit cultures:Neoliberal governmentality,socialist legacy,or technologies of governing?[J].American Ethnologist,35(2):275-289.
• Kosack S,Fung A.2014.Does transparency improve governance?[J].Annual Review of Political Science,17:65-87.
• Nove A.1958.The problem of “success indicators” in Soviet industry[J].Economica,25(97):1-13.
• Pan R K,Petersen A M,Pammolli F,et al.2018.The memory of science:Inflation,myopia,and the knowledge network[J].Journal of Informetrics,12(3):656-678.
• Triantafillou P.2007.Benchmarking in the public sector:A critical conceptual framework[J].Public Administration,85(3):829-846.