张振波,闫钊

• 1:浙江财经大学公共管理学院
• 2:南京审计大学国家治理与国家审计研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

地方政府间建构横向关系网络并推进府际交流与合作，是实现公共服务均等化的可行路径。本文以2010—2019年广东省21个地级市为样本，评估了省内对口帮扶与官员交叉任职两种府际关系的建构对区域间公共服务供给差距的影响，并分析了公共服务注意力配置与出访考察学习等城市自组织行为在这一影响关系中的中介效应机制。结果表明：一方面，上级政府建构形成的两种府际关系均能够显著缩小区域间基本公共服务供给水平的差距，但对口帮扶呈现出更为显著、快速和可持续的公共服务均等化效应；另一方面，府际关系建构的这一均等化效应，是以政府公共服务注意力分配和更高频次的城市间考察交流为依托进行传导和实践的，且这一中介效应对于对口帮扶关系和注意力分配而言尤为明显，权威推动下的地方政府注意力调配是实现府际关系建构之实践治理效应的有效机制。本文为政府间关系网络及其公共服务均等化效应提供了一个综合性的阐析框架，并为府际关系“结构—功能”研究开拓了一个基于官员政策偏好“行动”视角的解析路径。

关键词(KeyWords)： 府际关系建构;自组织行为;公共服务均等化;区域公共服务供给差距

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 研究阐释党的二十大精神国家社科基金重大项目“‘三不腐’一体促进的能力建设与评价指标体系研究”(项目批准号:23ZDA133)资助

作者(Author): 张振波,闫钊

参考文献(References)：

• 安东尼·吉登斯.2003.社会学方法的新规则：一种对解释社会学的建设性批判[M].田佑中，刘江涛，译.北京：社会科学文献出版社.
• 包涵川.2021.中间层级何以保障政府运转?——政府过程中的副职领导研究[J].公共行政评论，14(1):95-113,220-221.Bao H C.2021.How can the intermediate tier guarantee the operation of government?A study on deputy leaders in the process of government[J].Journal of Public Administration,14(1):95-113,220-221.(in Chinese)
• 陈那波，张程.2022.“领导重视什么及为何?”:省级党政决策的注意力分配研究——基于2010—2017年省委机关报的省级领导批示[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(4):85-102.Chen N B,Zhang C.2022.What do leaders pay attention to and why:A study of attention allocation about political decision-making based on cross-provincial evidence (2010—2017)[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(4):85-102.(in Chinese)
• 储德银，韩一多，张同斌，等.2018.中国式分权与公共服务供给效率：线性抑或倒“U”[J].经济学(季刊),17(3):1259-1288.Chu D Y,Han Y D,Zhang T B,et al.2018.Chinese fiscal decentralization and efficiency of public service supply:Linear or inverse U-Curve[J].China Economic Quarterly,17(3):1259-1288.(in Chinese)
• 赫伯特·A.西蒙.2013.管理行为[M].詹正茂，译.北京：机械工业出版社.
• 何文炯.2022.共同富裕视角下的基本公共服务制度优化[J].中国人口科学，(1):2-15,126.He W J.2022.System optimization of basic public services in the perspective of common prosperity[J].Chinese Journal of Population Science,(1):2-15,126.(in Chinese)
• 花中东.2010.对口支援促进基本公共服务均等化效应分析——以四川地震灾区为例[J].西安财经学院学报，23(5):75-81.Hua Z D.2010.The effects analysis of counterpart support to the equalization of basic public services—Taking earthquake-stricken areas of Sichuan as a case[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Finance and Economics,23(5):75-81.(in Chinese)
• 李华，董艳玲.2020.中国基本公共服务均等化测度及趋势演进——基于高质量发展维度的研究[J].中国软科学，(10):74-84.Li H,Dong Y L.2020.The equalization measurement and trend evolution of China's basic public service—A study based on high quality development[J].China Soft Science,(10):74-84.(in Chinese)
• 李兴文，杨修博，梁向东.2021.财政纵向失衡、收支偏好与地方政府公共服务供给[J].江汉论坛，(12):5-14.Li X W,Yang X B,Liang X D.2021.On the financial vertical unbalanced,balance of preference and local governmental public good supply[J].Jianghan Tribune,(12):5-14.(in Chinese)
• 李永友，沈玉平.2010.财政收入垂直分配关系及其均衡增长效应[J].中国社会科学，(6):108-124,222-223.Li Y Y,Shen Y P.2010.Vertical distribution of fiscal revenue and its effect on balancing economic growth[J].Social Sciences in China,(6):108-124,222-223.(in Chinese)
• 刘培林，钱滔，黄先海，等.2021.共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法[J].管理世界，37(8):117-127,10.Liu P L,Qian T,Huang X H,et al.2021.The connotation,realization path and measurement method of common prosperity for all[J].Journal of Management World,37(8):117-127,10.(in Chinese)
• 刘伟.2014.学习借鉴与跟风模仿——基于政策扩散理论的地方政府行为辨析[J].国家行政学院学报，(1):34-38.Liu W.2014.Learning from and imitating the trend:Discrimination of local government behavior based on policy diffusion theory[J].Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance,(1):34-38.(in Chinese)
• 任皓.2022.府际交流网络与区域间市场分割——来自省级政府“一把手”异地考察交流的证据[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(3):80-93.Ren H.2022.Inter-governmental networks and market segmentation:Evidence from provincial party secretary's offsite visits[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(3):80-93.(in Chinese)
• 尚虎平.2021.保障与孵化公民基本生存与发展权利——我国基本公共服务均等化的历程、逻辑与未来[J].政治学研究，(4):64-74,156-157.Shang H P.2021.Protecting and incubating citizens' basic rights of survival and development:The process,logic and future of equalization of basic public services in China[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(4):64-74,156-157.(in Chinese)
• 申伟宁，柴泽阳，张韩模.2020.异质性生态环境注意力与环境治理绩效——基于京津冀《政府工作报告》视角[J].软科学，34(9):65-71.Shen W N,Chai Z Y,Zhang H M.2020.Heterogeneous ecological environmental attention and environmental governance performance—Based on the “government work report” in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J].Soft Science,34(9):65-71.(in Chinese)
• 塔尔科特·帕森斯.2003.社会行动的结构[M].张明德，夏遇南，彭刚，译.南京：译林出版社.
• 陶鹏，初春.2020.府际结构下领导注意力的议题分配与优先：基于公开批示的分析[J].公共行政评论，13(1):63-78,197.Tao P,Chu C.2020.The issue allocation and priority of leadership attention under an inter-governmental structure:Based on Leaders's instructions[J].Journal of Public Administration,13(1):63-78,197.(in Chinese)
• 文宏.2014.中国政府推进基本公共服务的注意力测量——基于中央政府工作报告(1954—2013)的文本分析[J].吉林大学社会科学学报，54(2):20-26,171.Wen H.2014.A measurement of government's attention to basic public services in China:Based on the text analysis of the central government work report (1954—2013)[J].Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition,54(2):20-26,171.(in Chinese)
• 文宏，赵晓伟.2015.政府公共服务注意力配置与公共财政资源的投入方向选择——基于中部六省政府工作报告(2007～2012年)的文本分析[J].软科学，29(6):5-9.Wen H,Zhao X W.2015.The configuration of the attention of public services and the option of the investment directions of public financial resources—A text analysis based on the government work reports of the six central provinces (2007～2012)[J].Soft Science,29(6):5-9.(in Chinese)
• 项继权.2008.基本公共服务均等化：政策目标与制度保障[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),47(1):2-9.Xiang J Q.2008.Equalization of basic public services:Policy objective and institutional guarantee[J].Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences),47(1):2-9.(in Chinese)
• 徐晓林，王妃萍，毛子骏，等.2022.智慧城市建设能否提升基本公共服务供给?——基于双重差分法的实证分析[J].社会政策研究，(3):79-93.Xu X L,Wang F P,Mao Z J,et al.2022.Can the construction of smart cities improve the provision of basic public services?An empirical analysis based on a differences-in-differences model[J].Social Policy Research,(3):79-93.(in Chinese)
• 岳经纶，吴永辉.2023.从资源分配到资源创造：再分配逻辑下的省内对口帮扶——基于广东的实践[J].学术研究，(4):44-52,177.Yue J L,Wu Y H.2023.From resource allocation to resource creation:Intra-provincial paired assistance under the logic of redistribution:An analysis based on Guangdong's practice[J].Academic Research,(4):44-52,177.(in Chinese)
• 曾润喜，朱利平.2021.晋升激励抑制了地方官员环境注意力分配水平吗?[J].公共管理与政策评论，10(2):45-61.Zeng R X,Zhu L P.2021.Does promotion incentive inhibit the level of environmental attention allocation of local leader?[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,10(2):45-61.(in Chinese)
• 张坤鑫.2021.地方政府注意力与环境政策执行力的倒U形关系研究[J].公共管理评论，3(4):132-161.Zhang K X.2021.An inverted U-shaped relationship between environmental attention and local government policy implementation[J].China Public Administration Review,3(4):132-161.(in Chinese)
• 张振波.2020.从逐底竞争到策略性模仿——绩效考核生态化如何影响地方政府环境治理的竞争策略?[J].公共行政评论，13(6):114-131,211-212.Zhang Z B.2020.From race-to-the-bottom to strategic imitation:How does the ecological transformation of government performance assessment affect the competing strategy of environmental governance across Chinese local governments[J].Journal of Public Administration,13(6):114-131,211-212.(in Chinese)
• 周黎安.2004.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作——兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究，39(6):33-40.Zhou L A.2004.The incentive and cooperation of government officials in the political tournaments:An interpretation of the prolonged local protectionism and duplicative investments in China[J].Economic Research Journal,39(6):33-40.(in Chinese)
• Feiock R C,Scholz J T.2009.Self-organizing federalism:Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Gilardi F.2010.Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes?[J].American Journal of Political Science,54(3):650-666.
• Hosseinpoor A R,Bergen N,Barros A J D,et al.2016.Monitoring subnational regional inequalities in health:Measurement approaches and challenges[J].International Journal for Equity in Health,15:18.
• Huang C,Yi H T,Chen T,et al.2022.Networked environmental governance:Formal and informal collaborative networks in local China[J].Policy Studies,43(3):403-421.
• Hudson J,Kim B Y.2014.Policy transfer using the ‘Gold Standard’:Exploring policy tourism in practice[J].Policy & Politics,42(4):495-511.
• LeRoux K,Brandenburger P W,Pandey S K.2010.Interlocal service cooperation in U.S.cities:A social network explanation[J].Public Administration Review,70(2):268-278.
• Stanickova M,Melecky L.2018.Understanding of resilience in the context of regional development using composite index approach:The case of European Union NUTS-2 regions[J].Regional Studies,Regional Science,5(1):231-254.
• Yi H T,Chen W N.2019.Portable innovation,policy wormholes,and innovation diffusion[J].Public Administration Review,79(5):737-748.
• Yi H T,Liu W X,Ma L.2024.Designed networks and the emergence of self-organizing interlocal learning network:Evidence from Chinese cities[J].Public Administration,102(1):21-39.
• Zhu X F,Meng T G.2020.Geographical leadership mobility and policy isomorphism:Narrowing the regional inequality of social spending in China[J].Policy Studies Journal,48(3):806-832.
• (1)除党政负责人之外,还统计了生态环境局、财政局等与公共服务供给高度相关(表1中所涉及维度)的职能部门负责人的考察交流活动,是考虑到职能部门官员受到党政负责人之偏好的较大影响,而公共服务供给一般又是由职能部门实际承担,因此这一做法从“过程”和“结果”两个维度体现了政府间的自组织关系强度。当然,在稳健性检验中,还观察了只考虑市委书记和市长时的情况,以降低因样本选择问题而对本文结论造成的潜在干扰。
• (2)限于篇幅,稳健性检验结果并未报告,读者可联系作者获取。