后科层时代下自由裁量权的管理理论——以美国两市的警察制度改革为例The Theory of Accountability for Discretionary Authority in the Post-Bureaucratic Era:Cases of Policing Reforms in New York City and Cincinnati
高臻,曾志敏
摘要(Abstract)：
传统行政理论一般认为,应通过规则的完善尽量避免行政过程中的自由裁量权。然而,现代社会日益增加的不确定性使得人们不得不调整对自由裁量权的认识和应对。如何在当代的语境下实现对自由裁量权的问责,是后科层时代公共行政需要回答的重要问题,而新公共管理理论和实验主义治理对自由裁量的理解则分别代表着两种出路。本文试图通过美国纽约市和辛辛那提市的警察制度改革来比较这两种理论提出的不同应对方案,并阐述两种方案背后的政治哲学基础,也对当代中国的政府治理实践的镜鉴做了讨论。
关键词(KeyWords)： 自由裁量权;新公共管理;实验主义治理;警察制度改革
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 高臻,曾志敏
参考文献(References)：
- (1)Sparrow,M.K.,The Regulatory Craft:Controlling Rislks,Solving Problems,and Managing Compliance,Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,2011,p.241.
- (1)杰里·马肖:《创设行政宪制——被遗忘的美国行政法百年史(1787~1887)》,宋华琳、张力译,中国政法大学出版社,2016,第66页、322页。
- (2)Sabel,C.F.&Simon,W.H.,“Due Process of Administration:The Problem of Police Accountability,”Columbia Public Law Research Paper,2014,p.3.
- (1)Ernst,F.R.,Tocqueville's Nightmare:The Administrative State Emerges in America,1900-1940,New York:Oxford University Press,2014,pp.10-14.
- (2)Wilson,J.Q.,Varieties of Police Behavior:The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1968,p.72.
- (3)美国行政法史认为芝加哥法学院教授Freund和哈佛法学院院长Frankfuter之间关于“Rechtstaat”在美国是否可能实现的论战是理论转向的重要标志。参见Parrish,M.E.,Felix Frankfurter and His Times,New York:Free Press,1982。
- (4)Howard,P.K.,The Death of Common Sense:How Law is Suffocating America,Random House,2011,p.186.
- (1)欧文·E.休斯:《公共管理导论》,彭和平译,中国人民大学出版社,2001,第7页。
- (2)集中体现在20世纪80年代占据主导地位的成本收益分析(cost-benefit analysis)模型中。
- (3)余凌云:《论行政法上的比例原则》,《法学家》2002年第2期。
- (4)Sabel,C.F.,&Zeitlin,J.,Experimentalist Governance,"in The Oxford Handbook of Governance,edited by Levi-Faur,New York:Oxford University Press,2012,pp.169-183.
- (1)Sparrow,M.K.,The Regulatory Craft:Controlling Risks,Solving Problems,and Managing Compliance,Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,2011,pp.243-250.
- (2)Simon,W.S.,Toyota Jurisprudence:Legal Theory and Rolling Rule Regime,Columbia Public Law&Legal Theory Working Papers,2004.
- (1)Bratton,W.J.,&Kelling,G.L.,“Why We Need Broken Windows Policing,”https://www.city-journal.org/html/why-we-need-broken-windows-policing-13696.html,accessed March 5,2018.
- (1)Wilson,J.Q.,&Kelling,G.L.,“Broken Windows,"Critical Issues in Policing:Contemporary Readings,1982,pp.395-407.
- (2)Sabel,C.&Simon,W.H.,"The Duty of Responsible Administration and the Problem of Police Accountability",Yale Journal on Regulation.2016(33),p.186.
- (3)Bratton,W.J.&Malinowski,S.W.,“Police Performance Management in Practice:Taking Compstat to the Next Level,"Policing,2008(2),pp.260-261.
- (1)Sabel,C.&Simon,W.H.,“The Duty of Responsible Administration and the Problem of Police Accountability,"Yale Journal on Regulation,2016(33),p.198.
- (1)Shallwani,P.,&Gariner,S.,"NYPD Officers'Pushed'on Stop-and-Frisk:Police Commissioner Bratton,"http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2014/01/30/nypd-officers-pushed-on-stop-and-frisk-police-commissionerbratton/,accessed March 4,2018.
- (1)Schneiderman,E.T.et al.,A Report on Arrests Arising from the New York City Police Department's Stop-andfrisk Practices,New York State Office of the Attorney General,New York,2013.
- (1)这里的手段高于目的是指对于一线警察而言,目的不是他们应该考虑的内容。参见Goldstein,H.,“Improving Policing:A Problem-oriented Approach,”Crime&Delinquency,1979(2),pp.236-258。
- (2)Tonry,M.,Malign Neglect:Race,Crime,and Punishment in America,New York:Oxford University Press,1995,p.29.
- (1)涂尔干:《社会学方法的准则》,狄玉明译,商务印书馆,1995,第84-90页。
- (1)体现为确定政策目标后,相关部门会将目标量化分解,通过签订责任书的形式层层下派到下级组织以及个人,要求其在规定的时间内完成。
- (2)对于完成指标任务的组织和个人,可给予物质和精神等方面的激励,但是一些重要任务实行的是连带性的“一票否决”。一旦该项工作无法达到要求,就会直接影响到对该部门全年工作的评价,乃至个人的发展。