Richard Bovd,刘鼎盛,禹思

• 1: 荷兰莱顿大学日本和韩国语言文化系

摘要(Abstract)：

寻租理论试图解释依靠限价机制而不是市场机制促进经济增长所引起的消极后果。这些机制包括国家干预授予进口许可证、创造垄断等政治行为。最近人们的注意力被一些国家和地区经济成功的故事所吸引,在这些国家和地区,广泛存在的寻租被证明与高速度经济增长是相容的。日本和中国台湾就是这样的例子。这就吸引我们去辨认这些国家和地区租的具体样式或寻租的模式,评估租和寻租到底对它们的经济增长起积极作用还是消极作用。本文试图在经验判断的证据上建立识别墨西哥的寻租模式。作者认为,墨西哥存在着一个与众不同的寻租模式,即同一的社会和文化认可以及深植于实践中的权力。墨西哥寻租模式中公共机构拥有举足轻重的地位,这不仅表现在它对企业行为的影响,还表现在国家的政策理解和掌舵能力上。

关键词(KeyWords)： 墨西哥;日本;寻租

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): Richard Bovd,刘鼎盛,禹思

参考文献(References)：

• ①C.W.Reynolds,“Why Mexico's‘stabilizing development’was actually destabilizing(with some implications for the future),”World Development,Vol.6,No.7-8(1978),pp.1005-1018.
• ②H.A.Camin and L.Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution.Austin:University of Texas Press,1993,p.260.See also.D.C.Levy and K.Bruhn,with E.Zebauda,Mexico,The Struggle for Democratic Development.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,2001,pp.149-179.
• ①N.Lustig,Mexico:The Remaking of an Economy,2nd edn,Washington DC:The Brookings Institution,1998.
• ②J.M.Cypher,“Disaccumulation,Dependence and Delegitimation:The Tripartite Crisis of the Mexican State,”paper presented to the Latin American Studies Association,Chicago,Illinois,1998.
• ③J.C.Castaneda,The Mexican Shock,New York:The New Press,1995.
• ④Lustlng甚至指出“从远景来看，当代墨西哥的经济历史表现出一种后退”，see N.Lustig“Failing to take off:Mexico's economic saga.”in T.Yanagihara and S.Sambommatsu(eds.).East Asian Development Experience.Economic System Approach and Its Applicability.Tokyo:Institute of Developing Economies,1997, p.270。
• ⑤Ibid..p.271.
• ①See J.O.Haley,“The paradox of weak power and strong authority in the Japanese state,”in R.Boyd and T. W.Ngo(eds.),Asian States Beyond the Developmental Perspective.London and New York:RoutledgeCurzon,2005, pp.67-82.
• ②M.A.Centeno,Democracy within Reason:Technocratic Revolution in Mexico,2nd edn.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press,1997.
• ③发展型国家的论题本身就是富有争议的。我们的观点与G．Curtis，The Logic of Japan's Politics，New York：Columbia University Press，1999接近。这个论题，无论其重要性，在日本学者和西方学者的支持中没有取得一致。在考虑这种不一致的时候没有足够的理由和证据。类似的重要性警告，与日本的工业政策相关。一个平衡的观点，参见R.Komiya,M.Okuno,and K.Suzumura(eds.),Industrial Policy of Japan,Tokyo:Academic Press Japan,1988。
• ④S.Haggard,Pathways.from the Periphery:The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries.Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1990.
• ⑤Cypher,Disaccumulation,Dependence and Deligitimation,p.7.
• ④M.H.Khan and K.S.Jomo(eds.),Rents,Rent-Seeking and Economic Development:Theory and Evidence in Asia.Camhridge:Cambridge University Press,2000,pp.1-2.
• ①关于这些改革成功的有趣评定可以参见Aaron Tornell,Economic Crises and Reform in Mexico pp.127- 150 in Stephen Haber(ed.),Crony Capitalism and Economic Growth in Latin America,Theory and Evidence, Hoover Institution Press,Stanford University,Stanford California,2002.
• ①这个对日本寻租模式的总结节选于Richard Boyd“Modes of Rent Seeking and Economic Outcomes in Japan and Taiwan,”in China Public Administration Review,vol.a(2005),pp.1-36.
• ②J.S.Herzog cited by A.Oppenheimer.Bordering on Chaos:Mexico's Roller-Coaster Journey toward Prosperity.Canada:Little,Brown &.Company,1996.p.105.
• ③R.D.Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development.Baltimore and London:John Hopkins University Press,1971,p.8.
• ④Y.Nakasone,The Making of the New Japan,Reclaiming the Political Mainstream,translated and annotated by L.Connors,Richmond:Curzon 1999,p.223.
• ①■.Paz,The Labyrinth of Solitude.New York:Grove Press,1985.
• ②E.Krauze,Mexico,Biography of Power,A History of Modern Mexico 1810-1996.New York:Harper Perennial,1997,p.xiii.
• ③接下去的一些文字依赖于Hansen的经典研究The Politics of Mexican Development.Baltimore and London:John Hopkins University Press,1971.我们同样感激Camin和Meyer对于墨两哥当前历史的研究.In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution.See also L.Meyer,La Segunda Muerte de la Revalucion Mexicana.Mexico City:Editorial Caly Arena,1992.
• ④Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development,p.143.
• ①L.N.McAlister,“Social structure and social change in new Spain,”Hispanic American Historical Review,vol.43(1963).pp.349-470,cited by Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development,p.135.
• ②引用于C.A.Hale,Mexican Liberation in the Age of Mora,1821-1853.New Haven:Yale University Press,1968,p.14.还可以参阅V.Alba,The Mexicans:The Making of a Nation.New York:Praeger,1967;J. S.Bazant,A Concise History of Mexico:From Hidalgo to Cardenas 1805-1940.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1977:L.Bethell(ed.),Mexico since Independence.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1991 ;and F.R.Brandenburg,The Making of Modern Mexico,Englewood Cliffs.NJ:Prentice-Hall,1964.
• ③E.H.Gruening,Mexico and Its Heritage.New York:Century Co,1928,p.20 cited by Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development,p.143.
• ④Krauze,Mexico,Biography of Power,pp.204-224.
• ②Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development,p.148.
• ③Krauze,Mexico,Biography of Power,pp.205-237.
• ④Hansen,The Politics of Mexican Development,p.157.
• ①■amin and Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexrican Revolution.p.40.
• ②D.C.Villegas,ed.,Historia moderna de M■xico:El porfiriato,la vida polilica exterior,vols 8-9,Mexico City:Hermes,1970-1972,p.31.
• ④■amin and Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution,p.254.
• ①Camin and Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution,p.255.
• ②R.Beteta,Oral History interviews with James and Edna Wilkie,17 December 1964,Mexico City cited in J.Wilkie,The Mexican Revolution:Federal Expenditure and Social Change Sinee 1910.Berkeley:University of California Press,1967,pp.8-9.
• ③Oppenheimer,Bordering on Chaos,p.30.
• ①在墨两哥工业化期间．从1890-1940年，关于企业对于政府的回应的指南性评述来自于S．H．Haber的研究。S.H.Haber,Industry and Underdevelopment:The Industrialization of Meaico,Stanford:Stanford University Press．1989，p．29。“企业的策略”是这本书第六章的标题。
• ②Gregory Clark告诉我们在墨西哥建立纺织工厂的成本是19．79美元一纺锤，而在英国是12．72美元一纺锤;G.Clark,“Why isn't the whole world developed? Lessons from the cotton mills,”Journal of Economic History,year,vol.47.no.1,pp.141-174。
• ①El Economista Mexicana,7 May 1904.p.116.cited by Haber,Industry and Underdevelopment,p.42.
• ①El Economista Mexicana,7 May 1904,p.116,cited by Haber,Industry and Underdevelopment,pp.63-83.
• ②Ibid.,p.69.
• ①这部分来源于T．King对墨西哥贸易和工业化政策的研究。See T.King,Mexico:Industrialisation and Trade Policies since 1940.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1970,especially chapters 2-5.
• ①Julio de Leon Figueroa,El Control Directo a las Importaciones en Mexico,thesis for Mexican National University 1966-Cited by King p.77.
• ②See King,Mexico:Industrialisation and Trade Policies since 1940,p.78.
• ①Camin and Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution,p.260.
• ②Ibid..p.164.
• ③Levy and Bruhn,Mexico,The Struggle for Democratic Development,p.156.
• ④Ibid.,p.159.
• ⑤Ibid.,p.161.
• ①Levy and Bruhn,Mexico,The Struggle for Democratic Development,p.163.
• ③M.Delal Baer,“Mexico's second revolution:pathways to liberalization,”in R.Roett(ed.),Political and Economic Liberalization in Mexico:At a Critical Juncture? Boulder and London:Lynne Rienner,1993;L.Rubio,“Economic reform and political change in Mexico,”in Ruett(ed.),Political and Economic Liberalization in Mexico;and S.Weintraub and M.Delal Baer,“The interplay between economic and political opening:the sequence in Mexico,”The Washington Quarterly,Spring 1992,pp.187-201.See also P.Streeten,“Markets and states: against minimalism,”World Development,vol.21.no.8(1993),pp.1281-1298.
• ④J.Clifton,The Politics of Telecommunications in Mexico:Privatization and State-Labour Relations, 1982-1995.Basingstoke:Macmillan Palgrave,2000.p.82.
• ①J.Clifton,The Politics of Telecommunications in Mexico:Privatization and State-Labour Relations, 1982-1995.Basingstoke:Macmillan Palgrave,2000,p.83.
• ②Ibid.,p.37.See also L.Manzetti and C.H.Blake,“Market reforms and corruption in Latin America:new means for old ways,”Review of International Political Economy,vol.3,no.4(1996),pp.662-695 ;and B. Harriss-White and G.White(eds.),Liberalization and the New Corruption,International Development Studies Bulletin,Sussex,year,vol.27,no.2.
• ③Clifton,The Politics of Telecommunications in Mexico,p.37.
• ②Camin and Meyer,In the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution,pp.228-229.
• ⑤C.Elizondo.“In search of revenue:tax reform in Mexico under the administrations of Echeverria and Salinas,”Journal of Latin American Studies.vol.26(1994),pp.159-190.
• ①G.Diaz,Assistant Secretary for Revenue Affairs under Salinas-cited in ibid.,p.135.
• ③事实上，在2001年，当福克斯尽力引进多样的税收改革时．“他的改革在国会上没有支持者，他将改革转移到对于餐厅餐饮和旅馆费的附加税上”。see S.Haber,“Mexican Gridlock,”Hoover Institure Weekly Essay, date/year,available online,＜http://www-hoover.stanford,edu/pubaffairs/we/2002/haber_0802pdf＞, accessed?
• ①A.Galal,L.Jones,P.Tandory,and I Vogelsang,Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises,an Empirical Analysis.AWB Book,Washington:Oxford University Press,1994,p.460;M.Ramirez,“Privatization and regulatory reform in Mexico and Chile:a critical overview,”Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. vol.38,no.3(1998),pp.421-439.
• ②T.Legler,“Optimal Policy-Making? The Insulated Technocracy Argument and the Case of the Salinas Administration in Mexico,”CERLAC Working Paper Series,Ontario:Youk University,1996.
• ③G.Diaz,“The origin of Mexico's 1994 financial crisis,”Cato Journal,vol.17,no.3(1998).
• ①Oppenheimer,Bordering on Chaos,p.92.
• ②“The National lottery is the party's petty cash.Whenever we need a few million from one day to another, there's where we get it from in the Opposition.”Ibid.,p.88.
• ③Ibid.,p.91.
• ②J.K.Galhraith(no further specification)cited in K.S.Taylor,Human Society and the Global Economy, 1996,available online,＜http://online.bcc.ctc.edu/econ 100/ksttext/oligoply/oligoply.htm＞,accessed.
• ③Legler,“Optimal Policy-Making?”p.10.