“繁文缛节”如何影响专项治理绩效?——基于基层政府数据的混合研究How Does Red Tape Affect the Performance of Campaign-style Governance?——Evidence from Chinese Grassroots Governments
杨帆,章志涵
摘要(Abstract)：
本文基于全国411个基层政府的数据,研究基层文件的数量如何影响专项治理绩效。研究发现:专项治理绩效与基层文件数量呈倒U形关系,即专项治理绩效随着基层文件数量的增加出现先增后减的变化。基于质性资料素材的分析表明,在达到"绩效拐点"前,基层政府能够在专项治理中兼顾制度环境和技术环境的要求,在满足上级绩效考核的同时也能实现组织预期的功能。然而,当越过"绩效拐点"后,受限于掌握的资源和工作能力,基层政府难以化解效益与合法性目标间的张力。为追求效益目标,忽视了过量文件导致的任务细分、制度交叠等问题,或为追求合法性目标,生产与组织实际绩效脱节的文件,并最终产生了组织绩效随文件数量增加而降低的现象。
关键词(KeyWords)： 繁文缛节;专项治理;文件;基层政府
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 杨帆,章志涵
参考文献(References)：
- 陈辉，陈晓军．2019．内容形式化与形式内容化:精准扶贫工作形式主义的生成机制与深层根源[J]．中国农村观察，(3):52-63.Chen H,Chen X J.2019.Formalization of content and substantiation of form:Formation mechanism and the root cause of formalism in targeted poverty alleviation work in rural China[J].China Rural Survey,(3):52-63.(in Chinese)
- 陈那波，蔡荣．2017．“试点”何以失败?---A市生活垃圾“计量收费”政策试行过程研究[J]．社会学研究，32(2):174-198.Chen N B,Cai R.2017.Shidian as a Chinese style of governance:A case study on the policy experiment of“Pay As You Throw”[J].Sociological Studies,32 (2):174-198.(in Chinese)
- 戴长征．2010．仪式和象征:当代中国基层政治的“控制艺术”和“权力技术”[J]．江苏行政学院学报，(6):87-93.Dai C Z.2010.Ritual and symbol:The“Manipulation Art”and“Power Skill”of the grass-roots politics in contemporary China[J].The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute,(6):87-93.(in Chinese)
- 韩志明．2008．街头官僚的行动逻辑与责任控制[J]．公共管理学报，5(1):41-48.Han Z M.2008.The action logic and responsibility control of the street-level-bureaucrat[J].Journal of Public Management,5(1):41-48.(in Chinese)
- 胡宇齐．2019-04-19(003)．开会不是形式主义，文山会海才是[N]．北京日报．
- 李达昌．1991．“文山会海”辩---科学工作方法探讨[J]．软科学，(1):69-71.Li D C.1991.The defense on“Wen Shan Hui Hai”-Discussion on scientific working methods[J].Soft Science,(1):69-71.(in Chinese)
- 楼宇生．1985．“文山会海”探源[J]．领导科学，(4):31-32.Lou Y S.1985.Exploring the source of“Wen Shan Hui Hai”[J].Leadership Science,(4):31-32.(in Chinese)
- 倪星，原超．2014．地方政府的运动式治理是如何走向“常规化”的?---基于S市市监局“清无”专项行动的分析[J]．公共行政评论，7(2):70-96.Ni X,Yuan C.2014.How local government campaign-style governance become routinized?-A case study for special action[J].Journal of Public Administration,7(2):70-96.(in Chinese)
- 倪星，王锐．2017．从邀功到避责:基层政府官员行为变化研究[J]．政治学研究，(2):42-51.Ni X,Wang R.2017.From credit claiming to blame avoidance:The change of government officials'behavior[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(2):42-51.(in Chinese)
- 彭亚平．2018．技术治理的悖论:一项民意调查的政治过程及其结果[J]．社会，38(3):46-78.Peng Y P.2018.The paradox of technical governance:A public opinion survey's political process and its results[J].Society,38(3):46-78.(in Chinese)
- 渠敬东，周飞舟，应星．2009．从总体支配到技术治理---基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J]．中国社会科学，(6):104-127.Qu J D,Zhou F Z,Ying X.2009.From macromanagement to micromanagementReflections on thirty years of reform from the sociological perspective[J].Social Sciences in China,(6):104-127.(in Chinese)
- 荣敬本．1998．从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M]．北京:中央编译出版社．Rong J B.1998.Transformation from the pressurized system to a democratic system of cooperation[M].Beijing:Central Compilation&Translation Press.(in Chinese)
- 唐皇凤．2007．常态社会与运动式治理---中国社会治安治理中的“严打”政策研究[J]．开放时代，(3):115-129.Tang H F.2007.Campaign-styled management of normal society[J].Open Times,(3):115-129.(in Chinese)
- 韦伯M，温克尔曼J.1997．经济与社会下卷[M]．林荣远，译．北京:商务印书馆．Weber M,Winckelmann J.1997.Economy and society[M].Lin R Y,trans.Beijing:The Commercial Press.(in Chinese)
- 王廷志．(2019-05-08)[2020-06-07]．网言网语|会议有增无减、减负有名无实……说说文风会风中的形式主义怪象[EB/OL].http://www.ccdi.gov.cn/toutiao/201905/t20190508_193552.html．
- 王雪峰．2002．剖析公共行政系统中的形式主义[J]．中国行政管理，(12):32-34.Wang X F.2002.Analysis the formalism in public administrative system[J].Chinese Public Administration,(12):32-34.(in Chinese)
- 王雨磊．2016．数字下乡:农村精准扶贫中的技术治理[J]．社会学研究，31 (6):119-142.Wang Y L.2016.Dripping the digits down:Technical governance in the rural targeted poverty alleviation[J].Sociological Research,31(6):119-142.(in Chinese)
- 吴少微，杨忠．2017．中国情境下的政策执行问题研究[J]．管理世界，(2):85-96.Wu S W,Yang Z.2017.Policy executive study in the Chinese context[J].Management World,(2):85-96.(in Chinese)
- 吴知论．2006．文山会海辨考[J]．中国行政管理，(1):14-16.Wu Z L.2006.The textual research of“Wen Shan Hui Hai”[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):14-16.(in Chinese)
- 杨雪冬．2012．压力型体制:一个概念的简明史[J]．社会科学，(11):4-12.Yang X D.2012.A pressure system:A brief history of a concept[J].Journal of Social Sciences,(11):4-12.(in Chinese)
- 易申波．2011．文山会海的经济学分析---以外部效应为视角[J]．南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版)，13(1):67-71,102.Yi S B.2011.An economic analysis of excessive paperwork and meetings:From the externality perspective[J].Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Science),13(1):67-71,102.(in Chinese)
- 殷浩栋，汪三贵，郭子豪．2017．精准扶贫与基层治理理性---对于A省D县扶贫项目库建设的解构[J]．社会学研究，32(6):70-93.Yin H D,Wang S G,Guo Z H.2017.Precise poverty alleviation and grassroots governance rationality:The deconstruction of the poverty alleviation project establishment of county D in province A[J].Sociological Research,32(6):70-93.(in Chinese)
- 袁海涛．2019-08-21(004).33次工作会议治不了的疯狂采砂[N]．中国纪检监察报．
- 臧雷振，徐湘林．2014．理解“专项治理”:中国特色公共政策实践工具[J]．清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)，29(6):161-170.Zang L Z,Xu X L.2014.Understanding the campaign-style governance:Public policy practice with Chinese characteristics[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),29(6):161-170.(in Chinese)
- 张远照．2020．为基层减负背景下“文山会海”整治研究[J]．行政与法，(2):29-39.Zhang Y Z.2020.Research on the regulation of“a mountain of paper work and a sea of meetings”from to relieve the burden on the grassroots[J].Public Administration&Law,(2):29-39.(in Chinese)
- 周庆智．2017．警惕基层“文山会海”回潮[J]．人民论坛，(19):36-38.Zhou Q Z.2017.We should be alert to the tide of grassroots“Wen Shan Hui Hai”[J].People's Tribune,(19):36-38.(in Chinese)
- 周雪光．2003．组织社会学十讲[M]．北京:社会科学文献出版社．Zhou X G.2003.Ten lectures on the sociology of organizations[M].Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press.(in Chinese)
- 周雪光．2011．权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J]．开放时代，(10):66-85.Zhou X G.2011.Authoritarian regime and effective governance:The institutional logics of China's contemporary state governance[J].Open Times,(10):66-85.(in Chinese)
- 周雪光．2015．项目制:一个“控制权”理论视角[J]．开放时代，(2):82-102.Zhou X G.2015.The project system:A perspective of the“Controlling Power”theory[J].Open Times,(10):82-102.(in Chinese)
- 周振超，张金城．2018．职责同构下的层层加码---形式主义长期存在的一个解释框架[J]．理论探讨，(4):28-33.Zhou Z C,Zhang J C.2018.An explanatory framework of formalism has long existed:Layers of overweight under“the Isomorphic Responsibility”[J].Theoretical Investigation,(4):28-33.(in Chinese)
- Borry E L.2013.Rule bending and red tape:Organizational and individual influences and the effect of ethical climate[D].Lawrence:University of Kansas．
- Bozeman B.2000.Bureaucracy and red tape[M].Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall．
- Fewsmith J.2013.The logic and limits of political reform in China[M].New York:Cambridge University Press．
- Meyer J W,Rowan B.1977.Institutionalized organizations:Formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,83(2):340-363．
- Pandey S K,Scott P G.2002.Red tape:A review and assessment of concepts and measures[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,12(4):553-580.
- (1)在中国知网上，以“文山会海”为“主题”，检索“期刊”子库，共检索到61篇文献，近60%为时事评论，检索时间:2020年11月10日15时48分。
- (1)基层文件的种类可按任务执行的不同阶段来划分。在不同阶段产生的文件包括正式公文、过程记录、阶段总结、案例报告、绩效表格、影像资料、签到打卡、工单报派、宣传文案等等。
- (1)东、中、西部省份划分依据参见国家统计局网站:http://www. stats. gov. cn/ztjc/zthd/sjtjr/dejtjkfr/tjkp/201106/t20110613_71947.htm。
- (1)“格”对应该网格员所在网格层级，如二级网格警务员配置标准为一格一员，即每二级网格配置一名警务员。