谭新雨,朴龙

• 1:华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院
• 2:南京大学政府管理学院
• 3:南京大学公共政策研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

面临新时代高素质基层干部队伍建设的迫切需求，集体担当作为俨然成为基层政府组织改革创新的内生动力。鉴于基层政府部门中领导的关键角色，本研究以担当作为的“涓滴效应”作为探索基层集体担当作为的重要视角。基于对C市和Y省的537名基层干部的2阶段“领导—下属”匹配调查以及157名基层干部的实验研究发现：基层领导干部担当作为显著影响下属基层干部的担当作为；风险规避偏好、变革责任感是担当作为实现有效“涓滴”的重要心理路径；领导—下属交换(LMX)质量显著影响基层领导干部担当作为对下属基层干部担当作为的作用效果。本研究基于自我决定理论，清晰描绘基层领导干部担当作为对下属基层干部担当作为的“涓滴效应”;深刻剖析基层领导干部担当作为“涓滴效应”的实现路径与积极情境，科学论证了基层政府组织中集体担当作为的现实可能与基层领导干部担当作为的时代价值。

关键词(KeyWords)： 基层干部;担当作为;涓滴效应;心理路径;领导—下属交换(LMX)

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金青年项目“新时代基层干部担当作为的生成逻辑与促进机制研究”(项目批准号:21CZZ037);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“公共危机情境中基层干部担当作为的心理机制与党建引领路径研究”资助

作者(Author): 谭新雨,朴龙

参考文献(References)：

• 陈鼎祥，刘帮成.2021.基层公务员变革担当行为的形成机理研究——公共服务动机的涓滴效应检验[J].公共管理评论，3(1):47-67.Chen D X,Liu B C.2021.A study on the formation mechanism for the taking-charge behavior of street-level civil servants:An examination of the trickle-down effects of public service motivation[J].China Public Administration Review,3(1):47-67.(in Chinese)
• 段哲哲，陈家喜.2021.新时代地方干部担当作为激励机制分析[J].政治学研究，(1):139-150,160.Duan Z Z,Chen J X.2021.Incentive mechanisms of the local cadres’ responsible behaviors in the new era[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(1):139-150,160.(in Chinese)
• 郭晟豪.2021.基层干部的担当作为：基于角色认同中介的动机与行为关系研究[J].公共管理与政策评论，10(1):67-80.Guo S H.2021.Taking charge of street-level cadres:A study on motivation and behavior with the mediation of role identity[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,10(1):67-80.(in Chinese)
• 黄扬，陈天祥.2020.街头官僚如何推动政策创新?——基层卫生服务领域中的创新案例研究[J].公共管理学报，17(4):74-86,170.Huang Y,Chen T X.2020.How do street-level bureaucrats promote policy innovation?—Case study of innovation in the field of basic-level health services[J].Journal of Public Management,17(4):74-86,170.(in Chinese)
• 林亚清，张宇卿.2019.领导成员交换关系会影响公务员变革型组织公民行为吗?——变革义务感的中介作用与公共服务动机的调节作用[J].公共行政评论，12(1):132-150,214-215.Lin Y Q,Zhang Y Q.2019.Does leader-member exchange improve public servants’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior?—Exploring the mediating role of felt responsibility for change and the moderating role of public service motivation[J].Journal of Public Administration,12(1):132-150,214-215.(in Chinese)
• 汪光炜，卫旭华.2021.职业声誉感知何以影响基层公务员公共服务动机：被调节的中介模型[J].公共管理评论，3(2):105-129.Wang G W,Wei X H.2021.How the professional reputation of grassroots civil servants affects their motivation for public service:A moderated mediating model[J].China Public Administration Review,3(2):105-129.(in Chinese)
• 习近平.2019.努力造就一支忠诚干净担当的高素质干部队伍[J].求是，(2):4-10.Xi J P.2019.Strive to build a contingent of loyal,clean and responsible cadres with high quality [J].Qiu Shi,(2):4-10.(in Chinese)
• 习近平.2020-10-14(2).在深圳经济特区建立40周年庆祝大会上的讲话[N].人民日报.
• 萧鸣政，王晨舟，吴万鹏，等.2015.“敢于担当”型领导考评标准的实证研究：结构探索与量表编制[J].中国人力资源开发，32(5):42-49,89.Xiao M Z,Wang C Z,Wu W P,et al.2015.The courage to take responsibilities:Evaluation model and measurement[J].Human Resources Development of China,32(5):42-49,89.(in Chinese)
• 元帅，陈志霞，郭金元.2022.自由裁量权对街头官僚公共服务动机的作用机理：被调节的中介模型[J].公共管理评论，4(1):126-151.Yuan S,Chen Z X,Guo J Y.2022.The influencing mechanism of discretion on street-level bureaucrats’ public-service motivation:A moderated mediation analysis[J].China Public Administration Review,4(1):126-151.(in Chinese)
• 张书维，李纾.2018.行为公共管理学探新：内容、方法与趋势[J].公共行政评论，11(1):7-36.Zhang S W,Li S.2018.Exploring behavioral public administration:Content,method and trend[J].Journal of Public Administration,11(1):7-36.(in Chinese)
• 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会.2020-10-29(4).中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[N].人民日报.
• Andersen S C,Jakobsen M L F.2018.Political pressure,conformity pressure,and performance information as drivers of public sector innovation adoption[J].International Public Management Journal,21(2):213-242.
• Arnold G.2015.Street-level policy entrepreneurship[J].Public Management Review,17(3):307-327.
• Baekgaard M.2017.Prospect theory and public service outcomes:Examining risk preferences in relation to public sector reforms[J].Public Administration,95(4):927-942.
• Bandura A.1977.Social Learning Theory[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
• Bauwens R,Audenaert M,Decramer A.2019.Fostering societal impact and job satisfaction:The role of performance management and leader-member exchange[J].Public Management Review,21(10):1486-1515.
• Bentein K,Lapalme M è,Guerrero S,et al.2022.How can servant leaders foster public employees’ service-oriented behaviors?A multilevel multisource study in Canadian libraries[J].Public Administration Review,82(2):269-279.
• Campbell J W.2018.Felt responsibility for change in public organizations:General and sector-specific paths[J].Public Management Review,20(2):232-253.
• Clark A F.2016.Toward an entrepreneurial public sector[J].Public Personnel Management,45(4):335-359.
• Destler K N.2017.A matter of trust:Street level bureaucrats,organizational climate and performance management reform[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,27(3):517-534.
• Dong H K D.2017.Individual risk preference and sector choice:Are risk-averse individuals more likely to choose careers in the public sector?[J].Administration & Society,49(8):1121-1142.
• Fleming C J.2020.Prosocial rule breaking at the street level:The roles of leaders,peers,and bureaucracy[J].Public Management Review,22(8):1191-1216.
• Frisch-Aviram N,Beeri I,Cohen N.2020.Entrepreneurship in the policy process:Linking behavior and context through a systematic review of the policy entrepreneurship literature[J].Public Administration Review,80(2):188-197.
• Fuller J B,Marler L E,Hester K.2006.Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior:Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,27(8):1089-1120.
• Hameduddin T,Lee S.2021.Employee engagement among public employees:Examining the role of organizational images[J].Public Management Review,23(3):422-446.
• Hassan S.2015.The importance of ethical leadership and personal control in promoting improvement-centered voice among government employees[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,25(3):697-719.
• Homberg F,Vogel R,Weiherl J.2019.Public service motivation and continuous organizational change:Taking charge behaviour at police services[J].Public Administration,97(1):28-47.
• Jakobsen M,Jacobsen C B,Serritzlew S.2019.Managing the behavior of public frontline employees through change-oriented training:Evidence from a randomized field experiment[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,29(4):556-571.
• Klijn E H,Eshuis J,Opperhuizen A,et al.2022.Blaming the bureaucrat:Does perceived blame risk influence inspectors’ enforcement style?[J].International Review of Administrative Sciences,88(2):283-301.
• Kuehnhanss C R,Murdoch Z,Geys B,et al.2017.Identity,threat aversion,and civil servants’ policy p Evidence from the European Parliament[J].Public Administration,95(4):1009-1025.
• Luu T.2018.Discretionary HR practices and proactive work behaviour:The mediation role of affective commitment and the moderation roles of PSM and abusive supervision[J].Public Management Review,20(6):789-823.
• Meijer A J.2014.From hero-innovators to distributed heroism:An in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation[J].Public Management Review,16(2):199-216.
• Miao Q,Newman A,Schwarz G,et al.2018.How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior[J].Public Administration Review,78(1):71-81.
• Molines M,El Akremi A,Storme M,et al.2022.Beyond the tipping point:The curvilinear relationships of transformational leadership,leader-member exchange,and emotional exhaustion in the French police[J].Public Management Review,24(1):80-105.
• Morrison E W,Phelps C C.1999.Taking charge at work:Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change[J].Academy of Management Journal,42(4):403-419.
• Mostafa A M S,El-Motalib E A A.2020.Ethical leadership,work meaningfulness,and work engagement in the public sector[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,40(1):112-131.
• Nguyen N T H,Tuan L T.2022.Trust in multi-level managers and employee extra-role behavior in the US federal government:The role of psychological well-being and workload[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,42(2):312-337.
• Nicholson-Crotty S,Nicholson-Crotty J,Fernandez S.2017.Performance and management in the public sector:Testing a model of relative risk aversion[J].Public Administration Review,77(4):603-614.
• Park J,Hassan S.2018.Does the influence of empowering leadership trickle down?Evidence from law enforcement organizations[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,28(2):212-225.
• Salancik G R,Pfeffer J.1978.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,23(2):224-253.
• Vigoda-Gadot E,Beeri I.2012.Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public administration:The power of leadership and the cost of organizational politics[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,22(3):573-596.
• Weaver R K.1986.The politics of blame avoidance[J].Journal of Public Policy,6(4):371-398.
• Wei X,Zhang Z X,Chen X P.2015.I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable:A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,100(5):1641-1652.
• (1)“涓滴效应”指某种特定行为、知觉或体验的自上而下逐层扩散的现象。以往研究大多设计3个层次(高层领导→中层领导→下属成员),但这样很难实现对“涓滴效应”内在机制的考察。因此,本研究为实现对基层领导干部担当作为“涓滴效应”内在机制的有效检验,仅设计两个层次(直接领导→下属成员)。
• (2)林亚清和张宇卿(2019)关于变革责任感的测量量表实则是在Morrison and Phelps(1999)、Campbell(2018)的变革责任感测量量表基础上基于中国场景进行了情境化修订。为了确保测量工具的准确性,本研究同时参考该变量的国内外量表版本,并通过预调研结合基层管理实践进行修订。因此,量表均罗列多个来源。
• (3)在实验研究中,本研究统一以“高水平担当作为领导”和“低水平担当作为领导”来表述基层领导干部不同担当作为水平的实验操纵;以“高质量领导—下属交换(LMX)”和“低质量领导—下属交换(LMX)”来界定领导—下属交换(LMX)质量差异的实验操纵,下同。
• (4)此处的问卷填写是用来检查实验干预效果,而非纳入后续的实验结果分析。