单学鹏

• 1:华北电力大学法政系
• 2:华北电力大学区域法治与司法治理研究中心

摘要(Abstract)：

协同治理等公共管理概念的多元化倾向有可能造成研究理解和应用实践方面的混乱，因此需要进一步关注其精准化的研究策略与方向。本文对国内外核心期刊中的协同治理实证研究展开系统性回顾，力求从研究的关注要点、手段策略和内容主题三个维度，把握中国情境下的协同治理研究的定位与方向。在关注要点上，中国情境下的协同治理研究偏重于探讨本土化特色议题领域中公共部门作用的发挥。在手段策略上，中国情境下的协同治理研究创新应用了演化博弈、内容分析和协同度测量等研究工具。在内容主题上，中国情境下的协同治理研究发掘了特色化协同治理逻辑链条，重点关注了协同治理的正向影响。本文对国内外协同治理研究展开比较与分析，旨在加深对中国情境下协同治理的认知，并促进相关研究策略的创新发展，为该领域的深入探索提供助益。

关键词(KeyWords)： 协同治理;协同治理网络;协同度;协同优势;概念

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“都市圈公共服务协同供给机制研究”(项目批准号:2024MS164);; 河北省社会科学发展研究课题“京津冀城市群养老服务协同发展的政策效应与长效机制研究”(项目批准号:202403121);; 河北省高等学校青年拔尖人才计划项目“区域协调发展视角下河北省减污降碳的空间协同效应及优化路径研究”(项目批准号:BJ2025286)的资助

作者(Author): 单学鹏

参考文献(References)：

• 胡重明.2020.“政府即平台”是可能的吗?——一个协同治理数字化实践的案例研究[J].治理研究，36(3):16-25.Hu C M.2020.Is “Government as a platform” possible?—A case study of the digital practice of collaborative governance[J].Governance Studies,36(3):16-25.(in Chinese)
• 李响，陈斌.2020.“聚集信任”还是“扩散桥接”?——基于长三角城际公共服务供给合作网络动态演进影响因素的实证研究[J].公共行政评论，13(4):69-89,206-207.Li X,Chen B.2020.“Clustering with credible commitment” or “Diffusion with bridge”?An empirical investigation of evolving intercity public service delivery network in Yangtze River Delta metropolitan area[J].Journal of Public Administration,13(4):69-89,206-207.(in Chinese)
• 李智超，李奕霖.2022.横向合作与纵向干预：府际合作如何影响环境治理?——基于三城市群的比较研究[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(6):36-48.Li Z C,Li Y L.2022.Horizontal cooperation and vertical intervention:How does inter-governmental cooperation affect environmental performance?—A comparative study of three urban agglomerations[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(6):36-48.(in Chinese)
• 穆勒 J S.2014.逻辑体系[M].郭武军，杨航，译.上海：上海交通大学出版社，1.Mill J S.2014.A system of logic,ratiocinative and inductive[M].Guo W J,Yang H,trans.Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University Press,1.(trans.into Chinese)
• 单学鹏，罗哲.2021.成渝地区双城经济圈协同治理的结构特征与演进逻辑——基于制度性集体行动的社会网络分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),27(2):55-66.Shan X P,Luo Z.2021.The structural features and evolutionary logic of collaborative governance of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle:Social network analysis based on institutional collective action [J].Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition),27(2) 55-66.(in Chinese)
• 单学鹏.2021.中国语境下的“协同治理”概念有什么不同?——基于概念史的考察[J].公共管理评论，3(1):5-24.Shan X P.2021.What are the characteristics of the concept of collaborative governance in a Chinese context?—Based on a survey on conceptual history[J].China Public Administration Review,3(1):5-24.(in Chinese)
• 锁利铭，张朱峰.2016.科技创新、府际协议与合作区地方政府间合作——基于成都平原经济区的案例研究[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),24(4):61-71.Suo L M,Zhang Z F.2016.Science and technology innovation,inter-local agreements and collaboration among local governments in cooperation zone:A case study of Chengdu Plain Economic Zone[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),24(4):61-71.(in Chinese)
• 锁利铭，李雪，阚艳秋，等.2018.“意愿-风险”模型下地方政府间合作倾向研究——以泛珠三角为例[J].公共行政评论，11(5):99-116,188-189.Suo L M,Li X,Kan Y Q,et al.2018.Partner selection intention of interlocal cooperation from the “Willingness—risk” perspective—A case study on Pan Pearl River Delta[J].Journal of Public Administration,11(5):99-116,188-189.(in Chinese)
• 锁利铭，陈斌.2021.地方政府合作中的意愿分配：概念、逻辑与测量——以泛珠三角为例[J].学术研究，(4):58-67.Suo L M,Chen B.2021.Allocation of the cooperating willingness among local governments:Concept,logic and measurement——evidence from the Pan-Pearl River Delta Region[J].Academic Research,(4):58-67.(in Chinese)
• 王郅强，王国宏.2015.地方政府间合作的类型与影响因素述评[J].公共管理评论，20(3):117-132.Wang Z Q,Wang G H.2015.A review of the types and the influence of factors in cooperation among local governments[J].China Public Administration Review,20(3):117-132.(in Chinese)
• 吴芸，赵新峰.2020.京津冀区域协同发展的政策工具分析——基于2014年～2018年的政策文本[J].中共天津市委党校学报，22(4):68-76.Wu Y,Zhao X F.2020.An analysis of policy tools of coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J].Journal of the Party School of Tianjin Committee of the CPC,22(4):68-76.(in Chinese)
• 邢华，邢普耀.2021.强扭的瓜不一定不甜：纵向干预在横向政府间合作过程中的作用[J].经济社会体制比较，(4):84-94.Xing H,Xing P Y.2021.Mandate is also effective:The role of hierarchical intervention in the process of interlocal collaboration[J].Comparative Economic & Social Systems,(4):84-94.(in Chinese)
• 徐国冲.2022.合作治理研究的理论脉络及其发展[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),72(6):28-39.Xu G C.2022.Development of research on collaborative governance theory[J].Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences),72(6):28-39.(in Chinese)
• 徐换歌，王峰.2022.纵向干预下的城市群协作治理何以降低雾霾污染?[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(3):65-79.Xu H G,Wang F.2022.How does collaborative governance of urban agglomerations under vertical intervention reduce haze pollution?[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(3):65-79.(in Chinese)
• 颜昌武，张立伟，马亮.2020.公共管理学是一门借来的学科吗——对《中国行政管理》与邻近学科期刊互引情况的分析[J].上海行政学院学报，21(6):101-109.Yan C W,Zhang L W,Ma L.2020.Is public administration a borrowed discipline ——A citation analysis of leading journals in social science[J].The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute,21(6):101-109.(in Chinese)
• 颜佳华，吕炜.2015.协商治理、协作治理、协同治理与合作治理概念及其关系辨析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),39(2):14-18.Yan J H,Lv W.2015.On the discrimination about the concepts and their relationship of consultative governance,collaborative governance,synergistic governance and cooperation governance[J].Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),39(2):14-18.(in Chinese)
• 姚梅林.2003.情境理论的迁移观及其教育意义[J].心理学探新，23(4):13-16.Yao M L.2003.Situated theories on transfer and implications for teaching[J].Psychological Exploration,23(4):13-16.(in Chinese)
• 余晓，顾玲巧，单嘉祺.2022.整体政府视角下标准化治理府际合作的生成机理研究[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(5):131-141.Yu X,Gu L Q,Shan J Q.2022.Research on the inter-governmental cooperation formation mechanism of standardization governance from the perspective of joined-up government[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(5):131-141.(in Chinese)
• 周凌一.2022.正式抑或非正式?区域环境协同治理的行为选择——以2008—2020年长三角地区市级政府为例[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(4):120-136.Zhou L Y.2022.The behavioral selection of collaborative environmental governance:Formal or informal?——Based on the data of prefecture-level collaborations from 2008—2020 in Yangtze River Delta[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(4):120-136.(in Chinese)
• An B Y,Tang S Y.2023.When agency priorities matter:Risk aversion for autonomy and turf protection in mandated collaboration[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,33(1):106-121.
• Ansell C,Gash A.2008.Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4):543-571.
• Ansell C,Doberstein C,Henderson H,et al.2020.Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance:A mixed methods approach[J].Policy and Society,39(4):570-591.
• Ansell C.2021.Coping with conceptual pluralism:Reflections on concept formation[J].Public Performance & Management Review,44(5):1118-1139.
• Campbell J L,Quincy C,Osserman J,et al.2013.Coding in-depth semistructured interviews:Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement[J].Sociological Methods & Research,42(3):294-320.
• Cristofoli D,Markovic J,Meneguzzo M.2014.Governance,management and performance in public networks:How to be successful in shared-governance networks[J].Journal of Management and Governance,18(1):77-93.
• De Vries H,Bekkers V,Tummers L.2016.Innovation in the public sector:A systematic review and future research agenda[J].Public Administration,94(1):146-166.
• Elgin D J.2015.Cooperative interactions among friends and foes operating within collaborative governance arrangements[J].Public Administration,93(3):769-787.
• Emerson K,Nabatchi T.2015.Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes:A performance matrix[J].Public Performance & Management Review,38(4):717-747.
• Feiock R C.2013.The institutional collective action framework[J].Policy Studies Journal,41(3):397-425.
• Fischer M,Maag S.2019.Why are cross-sectoral forums important to actors?Forum contributions to cooperation,learning,and resource distribution[J].Policy Studies Journal,47(1):114-137.
• Fowler L.2019.Is partnership intensity or density more effective?[J].Public Performance & Management Review,42(5):1186-1210.
• Kim Y,Darnall N.2016.Business as a collaborative partner:Understanding firms’ sociopolitical support for policy formation[J].Public Administration Review,76(2):326-337.
• Lee Y,Lee I W,Feiock R C.2012.Interorganizational collaboration networks in economic development policy:An exponential random graph model analysis[J].Policy Studies Journal,40(3):547-573.
• Liu Y,Wu J N,Yi H T,et al.2021.Under what conditions do governments collaborate?A qualitative comparative analysis of air pollution control in China[J].Public Management Review,23(11):1664-1682.
• Provan K G,Kenis P.2008.Modes of network governance:Structure,management,and effectiveness[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(2):229-252.
• R?iseland A.2011.Understanding local governance:Institutional forms of collaboration[J].Public Administration,89(3):879-893.
• Scott T.2015.Does collaboration make any difference?Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes[J].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,34(3):537-566.
• Siciliano M D,Wang W J,Medina A.2021.Mechanisms of network formation in the public sector:A systematic review of the literature[J].Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,4(1):63-81.
• Siddiki S,Kim J,Leach W D.2017.Diversity,trust,and social learning in collaborative governance[J].Public Administration Review,77(6):863-874.
• Spicer Z.2017.Bridging the accountability and transparency gap in inter-municipal collaboration[J].Local Government Studies,43(3):388-407.
• Swann W L.2017.Examining the impact of local collaborative tools on urban sustainability efforts:Does the managerial environment matter?[J].The American Review of Public Administration,47(4):455-468.
• Ulibarri N,Scott T A.2017.Linking network structure to collaborative governance[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,27(1):163-181.
• Voorberg W H,Bekkers V J J M,Tummers L G.2015.A systematic review of co-creation and co-production:Embarking on the social innovation journey[J].Public Management Review,17(9):1333-1357.
• Wang H M,Ran B.2023.Network governance and collaborative governance:A thematic analysis on their similarities,differences,and entanglements[J].Public Management Review,25(6):1187-1211.
• Ward K D,Varda D M,Epstein D,et al.2018.Institutional factors and processes in interagency collaboration:The case of FEMA corps[J].The American Review of Public Administration,48(8):852-871.
• Xiang B.2016.Theory as vision[J].Anthropological Theory,16(2/3):213-220.
• Zhou L Y,Dai Y X.2023.Within the shadow of hierarchy:The role of hierarchical interventions in environmental collaborative governance[J].Governance,36(1):187-208.
• Zia A,Koliba C,Meek J,et al.2015.Scale and intensity of collaboration as determinants of performance management gaps in polycentric governance networks:Evidence from a national survey of metropolitan planning organisations[J].Policy & Politics,43(3):367-390.
• (1)对于协同治理概念,当前学界存在着一定的争议。一方面,作为治理谱系中的分支,“协同治理”同“治理”概念存在交叉。这二者都涉及多元主体之间的有序合作,在一定程度上带来了概念使用上的迷思。另一方面,协同治理概念同网络治理等概念的边界存在交叉。例如,Wang and Ran(2023)通过对网络治理和协同治理研究的主要主题进行专题分析,明确了这两个流派之间的关系纠葛。定义一个事物,就是从其所有属性中选择那些可通过名称指代并用以宣称该事物的特定属性(穆勒,2014)。为了避免概念边界模糊为后续研究带来不利影响,本研究认为,多元利益相关者(Ulibarri and Scott,2017)、公共部门发起(Ansell and Gash,2008;颜佳华和吕炜,2015)以及跨界(域)公共问题的解决(Emerson and Nabatchi,2015)是协同治理概念边界中的重要特征。
• (2)一方面,本文的研究目的是通过系统性回顾比较中国情境下协同治理研究的核心特点,因此采用了剩余界定法,对其他国家的协同治理研究统一界定为国外情境中的研究。例如,Ansell and Gash(2008)选用“逐次逼近”的方法对137个国际协同治理案例进行内容分析,归纳了协同治理的经典分析框架。另一方面,中国情境并不等同于中文发表,中国学者也有可能在国际上发表中国情境下的协同治理相关论文。中国情境中的研究不仅包括了中文发表的研究文献,也囊括了由中国学者针对本土化协同治理议题在国外核心刊物中发表的研究论文。因此,研究还将对文献研究内容所涉及的国别进行编码,并将其区分为中国情境中的研究与国外情境下的相关研究。