马翔,包国宪

• 1:兰州大学管理学院
• 2:兰州大学中国政府绩效管理研究中心
• 3:佛罗里达州立大学

摘要(Abstract)：

绩效损失的提出旨在从理论上实现政府绩效的最大化。然而绩效损失与领域内相似概念的辨别、测度方法以及发生机理等诸多问题尚待廓清。本文从概念演进视角出发,梳理了绩效损失的内涵变迁,在此基础上澄清了其概念空间,将其界定为基于公共价值的绩效目标与实际绩效产出之间的差距。依据以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理理论,构建了绩效损失的测度程序,从价值建构、组织管理和协同领导的构成要素出发,分析了绩效损失的发生机理。

关键词(KeyWords)： 绩效损失;公共价值;绩效目标

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年项目“公共项目绩效的价值建构及测度方法创新研究”(项目批准号:72104095)、国家自然科学基金面上项目“公共价值视角下的公共服务合作生产与绩效治理研究”(项目批准号:71974088);; 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“影响地方政府回应绩效有关问题:基于全国性网络问政平台大数据的实证研究”(项目批准号:21XJC630009);; 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“中国县级政府绩效的价值建构、数据挖掘与交互式呈现研究”(项目批准号:21lzujbkytd007)资助

作者(Author): 马翔,包国宪

参考文献(References)：

• 包国宪,王学军.2012.以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理---源起、架构与研究问题[J].公共管理学报,9(2):89-97.Bao G X,Wang X J.2012.Public value-based government performance governance:Origin,structure and research questions[J].Journal of Public Management,9(2):89-97.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,周云飞.2013.政府绩效评价的价值载体模型构建研究[J].公共管理学报,10(2):101-109.Bao G X,Zhou Y F.2013.Study on value carrier model construction of government performance evaluation[J].Journal of Public Management,10 (2):101-109.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,张弘.2015.基于PV-GPG理论框架的政府绩效损失研究---以鄂尔多斯“煤制油”项目为例[J].公共管理学报,12(3):117-125.Bao G X,Zhang H.2015.Performance loss analysis based on PV-GPG framework:Taking the coal-to-liquids project in Erdos as an example[J].Journal of Public Management,12(3):117-125.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,马翔.2018.基于PV-GPG理论框架的公共项目绩效损失问题研究---以G省世界银行项目为例[J].公共行政评论,11(5):70-98.Bao G X,Ma X.2018.Research on public project loss of performance based on PV-GPGtheoretical framework-Take G province world bank project as an example[J].Journal of Public Administration,11(5):70-98.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,马翔,李树军.2020.公共项目绩效损失结构、测度与评价方法研究[J].上海行政学院学报,21(4):34-46.Bao G X,Ma X,Li S J.2020.Research on the structure,measurement and evaluation of public project performance loss based on public value[J].The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute,21(4):34-46.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,张弘.2020.政府绩效治理中的协同领导体系构建:超越个体层面的公共领导新发展[J].行政论坛,27(3):97-104.Bao G X,Zhang H.2020.Building a cooperative leadership system in the government performance governance:A new development of public leadership beyond the individual level[J].Administrative Tribune,27(3):97-104.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,张弘.2021.党政融合机制下决策过程的绩效领导路径研究---来自中国L县的观察[J].中国行政管理,(3):84-93.Bao G X,Zhang H.2021.Performance leadership approach for public decision making in party-Government systems:Observations from county L in China[J].Chinese Public Administration,(3):84-93.(in Chinese)
• 包国宪,马翔.2022.基于公共价值的政府绩效评估:概念界定与理论框架[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),50(1):126-134.Bao G X,Ma X.2022.Government performance evaluation based on public value:Conceptualization and theoretical framework[J].Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences),50(1):126-134.(in Chinese)
• 曹惠民.2021.社区治理绩效损失:生成机理与矫正策略研究[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),43(12):72-83.Cao H M.2021.Performance loss of community governance:Research on generation mechanism and correction mechanism[J].Jinan Journal (Philosophy&Social Sciences),43(12):72-83.(in Chinese)
• 付才辉.2014.发展战略的成本与收益:一个分析框架---对新结构经济学的目标、争议与拓展的探讨[J].南方经济,(1):29-48.Fu C H.2014.An analytical framework of the costs and benefits of development strategy:On the dream,controversy and expanding of new structural economics[J].South China Journal of Economics,(1):29-48.(in Chinese)
• 何文盛,王焱,蔡明君.2013.政府绩效评估结果偏差探析:基于一种三维视角[J].中国行政管理,(1):50-54.He W S,Wang Y,Cai M J.2013.A study on government performance evaluation result distortions:Based on a Triple-dimensional perspective[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):50-54.(in Chinese)
• 何文盛,何志才.2016.地方政府绩效评估悖论形成机理探析---一个基于混沌理论的解释框架[J].北京行政学院学报,(5):25-30.He W S,He Z C.2016.The exploration and analysis of the formation mechanism of paradox of Performance evaluation of local governments[J].Journal of Beijing Administrative College,(5):25-30.(in Chinese)
• 何文盛,姜雅婷.2020.政府绩效评估“三权”视角下第三方评估权力组织模式与评估结果偏差---基于多案例的阐释[J].江苏行政学院学报,(4):98-105.He W S,Jiang Y T.2020.Organization model and deviation in evaluation results by third-party evaluation from the perspective of“Three powers”in government performance evaluation:An interpretation based on multiple cases[J].The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute,(4):98-105.(in Chinese)
• 霍春龙.2017.认知分歧与共享现实:公共政策绩效损失是如何产生的?[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),45(3):67-75.Huo C L.2017.What does public policy performance loss result from?[J].Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences) 45(3):67-75.(in Chinese)
• 怀特·杰伊.D,亚当斯·盖.B.2005.公共行政研究[M].刘亚平,高洁,译.北京:清华大学出版社.
• 郎玫,包国宪.2012.博弈视角下政府绩效评价模型选择的理论优化[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),49(3):115-120.Lang M,Bao G X.2012.Theory optimization of measurement model selection of government performance from game theory perspective[J].Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences),49(3):115-120.(in Chinese)
• 郎玫,郑松.2020.政策弹性、执行能力与互动效率:地方政府政策执行绩效损失生成机制研究[J].行政论坛,27(3):113-120.Lang M,Zheng S.2020.Policy flexibility,execution ability and interaction efficiency:Astudy on the generation mechanism of local government policy implementation performance loss[J].Administrative Tribune,27(3):113-120.(in Chinese)
• 李正彪,文峰.2009.农户经济行为视角的财政农业投资:绩效、原因、对策[J].经济问题探索,(10):61-64.Li Z B,Wen F.2009.Financial agricultural investment from the perspective of farmers'economic behavior:Performance,reasons and countermeasures[J].Inquiry into Economic Issues,(10):61-64.(in Chinese)
• 卢盛峰,陈思霞,杨子涵.2017.“官出数字”:官员晋升激励下的GDP失真[J].中国工业经济,(7):118-136.Lu S F,Chen S X,Yang Z H.2017.“Officials make the statistics”:GDP distortion resulted from officials'promotion motivation[J].China Industrial Economics,(7):118-136.(in Chinese)
• 王学军,马翔.2015.政府绩效生成路径:新范式下的理论及其解释[J].上海行政学院学报,16(4):24-32.Wang X J,Ma X.2015.Generating approaches of government performance:Theory and its interpretation under new paradigm[J].The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute,16(4):24-32.(in Chinese)
• 王学军.2017.政府绩效损失及其测度:公共价值管理范式下的理论框架[J].行政论坛,24(4):88-93.Wang X J.2017.The loss of government performance and its measurement:A theoretical framework under the public value management paradigm[J].Administrative Tribune,24(4):88-93.(in Chinese)
• 王学军,王子琦.2019.公共项目绩效损失测度及治理:一个案例研究[J].中国行政管理,(1):128-134.Wang X J,Wang Z Q.2019.The measurement and governance of the loss of performance in public project:A case study[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):128-134.(in Chinese)
• 肖剑忠.2011.“大跃进”和人民公社化决策失误探析[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,27(6):54-60.Xiao J Z.2011.Analysis of the“Great leap forward”and the decision-making errors of the people'commune[J].Journal of Zhejiang Provincial Party School,27(6):54-60.(in Chinese)
• 周凯,邬慧颖,高敬.2018.空气质量监测数据内藏“雾霾”?[J].半月谈,(3):70-71.Zhou K,Wu H Y,Gao J.2018.Is there“Smog”In the air quality monitoring data?[J].China Comment,(3):70-71.(in Chinese)
• 周晓丽.2005.新公共管理:反思、批判与超越---兼评新公共服务理论[J].公共管理学报,2(1):43-48,90.Zhou X L.2005.The new public management:Introspection,criticism and exceedingness-comments on the theory of new public service[J].Journal of Public Management,2(1):43-48,90.(in Chinese)
• 朱凌.2019.绩效差距和管理决策:前沿理论与定量研究评论[J].公共管理与政策评论,8(6):3-13.Zhu L.2019.Performance gaps and management decisions:Theoretical frontiers and empirical evidence[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,8 (6):3-13.(in Chinese)
• Andrews R,Boyne G A,Enticott G.2006.Performance failure in the public sector[J].Public Management Review,8(2):273-296.
• Arditi D.1985.Construction productivity improvement[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,111(1):1-14.
• Boyne G A,Gould-Williams J S,Law J,et al.2002.Core articles:Best value-Total quality management for local government?[J].Public Money&Management,22(3):9-16.
• Brudney J L.1985.Coproduction:Issues in implementation[J].Administration&Society,17(3):243-256.
• Bryson J M,Quick K S,Slotterback C S,et al.2013.Designing public participation processes[J].Public Administration Review,73(1):23-34.
• Cossolotto M.2006.Performance gap[J].Personal Excellence,11(4):11.
• Cutler T.2015.International encyclopedia of the social&behavioral sciences reference work·second edition[M].Elsevier:Amsterdam.
• De Graaf G,Meijer A.2019.Social media and value conflicts:An explorative study of the Dutch police[J].Public Administration Review,79(1):82-92.
• Dubsky P,?rd?gováM,Maly M,et al.2016.CEval:All-in-one software for data processing and statistical evaluations in affinity capillary electrophoresis[J].Journal of Chromatography A,1445:158-165.
• Favero N,Meier K J,O'Toole Jr J,et al.2014.Goals,trust,participation,and feedback:Linking internal management with performance outcomes[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,26(2):327-343.
• Heinrich C J.1999.Do government bureaucrats make effective use of performance management information?[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,9 (3):363-394.
• Hsu P L,Roth W M,Mazumder A.2009.Natural pedagogical conversations in high school students'internship[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(5):481-505.
• King L,Appleton J V.1999.Fourth generation evaluation of health services:Exploring a methodology that offers equal voice to consumer and professional stakeholders[J].Qualitative Health Research,9(5):698-710.
• Lincoln Y S.1992.Fourth generation evaluation,the paradigm revolution and health promotion[J].Canadian Journal of Public Health,83 Suppl 1:S6-S10.
• Locke E A,Latham G P.1991.A theory of goal setting&task performance[J].The Academy of Management Review,16(2):212-247.
• Lovallo D,Kahneman D.2003.Delusions of success.How optimism undermines executives'decisions[J].Harvard Business Review,81(7):56-63,117.
• Martín Cave.1990.Output and performance measurement in government:The state of the art[J].International Journal of Modern Physics,14(27):2914-2919.
• Meier K J,Bohte J.2000.Ode to Luther Gulick:Span of control and organizational performance[J].Administration&Society,32(2):115-137.
• Meier K J,Favero N,Zhu L,et al.2015.Performance gaps and managerial decisions:ABayesian decision theory of managerial action[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,25(4):12-21.
• Moore M H.1995.Creating public value:Strategic management in government[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
• Nicholson-Crotty S,Nicholson-Crotty J,Fernandez S.2017.Performance and management in the public sector:Testing a model of relative risk aversion[J].Public Administration Review,77(4):603-614.
• Patanakul P,Kwak Y H,Zwikael O,et al.2016.What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?[J].International Journal of Project Management,34 (3):452-466.
• Patrick B A,French P E.2011.Assessing new public management'focus on performance measurement in the public sector[J].Public Performance&Management Review,35(2):340-369.
• Rainey H G,Bozeman B.2000.Comparing public and private organizations:Empirical research and the power of the a priori[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(2):447-470.
• Rainey H G.1983.Review:Public organization theory:The rising challenge[J].Public Administration Review,43(2):176-182.
• Rijke J,Van Herk S,Zevenbergen C,et al.2014.Adaptive programme management through a balanced performance/strategy oriented focus[J].International Journal of Project Management,32(7):1197-1209.
• Sanderson S K.2002.Book review:Eugenics:A reassessment.Richard Lynn.Westport,CT:Praeger,2001,367 pp.(hardbound),$85.00[J].Population and Environment,24(2):219-222.
• Stake R E.1975.Letters:Statement of resignation from the vice presidency of division D of AERA[J].Educational Researcher,4(8):2.
• Van Thiel S,Leeuw F L.2002.The performance paradox in the public sector[J].Public Performance&Management Review,25(3):267-281.
• Wilson D C,Nielsen J R,Degnbol P.2003.The fisheries co-management experience[M].Dordrecht:Springer.
• (1)在公共行政活动中,理论上存在治理要素部分或全部失效而引发绩效损失的情况,各治理要素也会相互影响,但为聚焦主线并简化理论逻辑,本文不讨论要素之间的相互作用。
• (1)比如,在使命型绩效目标方面,本应该设置6%的经济增速目标来承载经济增长的使命价值需求,实际目标却设定为5%;在权益型绩效目标方面,承载回应性价值的政府回应率目标理应是100%,实际目标却设定为80%;在工具型绩效目标方面,承载效率价值的公共项目建设进度目标是6个月完工,实际目标却设定为9个月完工。