陈思丞,夏昕

• 1:清华大学公共管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

部委机构层面的政策执行对于我国政府运作至关重要，但是由于种种原因，过往研究更多聚焦于地方政府政策执行问题。本文以2015年到2022年国家机关事业单位养老保险制度改革过程中部分超编单位的执行困局为例，重点关注部委执行机构如何在创造性执行过程中化解政策的冲突性。研究发现：部委机构层面的政策执行具有政策执行者与被执行者行政地位差距小、信息不对称程度低、政策反馈渠道通畅等特征。这使得部委机构在面临执行困局时，政策的模糊性往往较低，而冲突性较早凸显，政策的冲突性会随着政策执行阶段的递进发生变化。随着政策冲突的加剧，不同于地方政府所采用的多种变通执行方式，部委机构的政策执行困局往往能较快地以政策修正的形式来化解冲突，从而实现政策制定部门与政策执行部门的协同互动。本文初步揭示了不同于地方政府的部委机构创造性执行中的冲突与修正模式，同时为国家机关事业单位养老保险制度改革提供了可供参考的路径。

关键词(KeyWords)： 部委机构;创造性执行;政策冲突性;政策修正;机关事业单位养老保险制度改革

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“声誉管理、协作网络与数字时代部委机构撤并机理与动态演化研究”(项目批准号：72374124);国家自然科学基金重大项目“大数据驱动的政策多维解析研究”(项目批准号：72293571);; 清华大学自主科研计划(项目批准号：2023THZWJC23)的资助

作者(Author): 陈思丞,夏昕

参考文献(References)：

• 《中国行政管理》编辑部，行云.2023.提高创造性执行效能确保党中央决策部署落地见效[J].中国行政管理，39:5.Editorial Department,Xing Y.2023.Improve the effectiveness of creative execution to ensure that the decisions and arrangements of the CPC Central Committee are effective[J].Chinese Public Administration,39:5.(in Chinese)
• 蔡英辉，刘文静.2012.中国政策冲突的降解之道——建构兼容性政策网络[J].中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),28:39-44.Cai Y H,Liu W J.2012.The degradation of policy conflict in China:Constructing compatibility policy network[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences) ,28:39-44.(in Chinese)
• 陈思丞，孟庆国.2016.领导人注意力变动机制探究——基于毛泽东年谱中2614段批示的研究[J].公共行政评论，9:148-176+189-190.Chen S C,Meng Q G.2016.Exploring the attention allocation mechanism of Chinese political elites:Based on the 2614 written directive from the Mao Zedong chorology biography[J].Journal of Public Administration,9:148-176+189-190.(in Chinese)
• 陈思丞，施瑞祺，刘婧玥，等.2022.嵌入性组织中的政策企业家如何推动政策创新?——基于农业生产托管政策变迁的历时观察[J].公共行政评论，15:126-145+199.Chen S C,Shi R Q,Liu J Y,et al.2022.How do policy entrepreneurs in embedded organizations drive policy innovation?—Diachronic observation based on changes of trusteeship policy of agricultural production [J].Journal of Public Administration,15:126-145+199.(in Chinese)
• 陈思丞，阎颖超，赵家鑫.2024.政策网络与创造性执行效能—基于J省M村盐碱地改良政策执行过程的历时研究[J].中国行政管理，40(5):16-27.Chen S C,Yan Y C,Zhao J X.2024.Policy network and creative implementation effectiveness—Longitudinal study on the implementation process of saline-alkali land improvement policy in Village M Province J[J].Chinese Public Administration,40(5):16-27.(in Chinese)
• 冯庆，许健，邹仰松.2003.政策冲突及其成因与应对策略[J].科技进步与对策，20:168-170.Feng Q,Xu J,Zou Y S.2003.Policy conflict,causes and countermeasures[J].Science&Technology Progress and Policy ,20:168-170.(in Chinese)
• 贺东航，孔繁斌.2011.公共政策执行的中国经验[J].中国社会科学：61-79+220-221.He D H,Kong F B.2011.Chinese experience in public policy implementation[J].Social Science in China:61-79+220-221.(in Chinese)
• 何佳旭，薛忠义，郭丰瑞.2022.公共政策冲突：碎片化运行还是利益博弈?[J].领导科学：95-98.He J X,Xue Z Y,Guo F R.2022.Public policy conflict:Fragmented operation or interest game?[J].Leadership Science:95-98.(in Chinese)
• 胡业飞，崔杨杨.2015.模糊政策的政策执行研究——以中国社会化养老政策为例[J].公共管理学报，12:93-105+157.Hu Y F,Cui Y Y.2015.Implementation of ambiguous policy:The case of socialized aged care service policy in China[J].Journal of Public Management,12:93-105+157.(in Chinese)
• 黄博函，谢嘉丽.2018.“模糊—冲突”模型下的私营企业养老保险政策执行偏差研究[J].中国公共政策评论，15(2):90-104.Huang B H,Xie J L.2018.A study on the deviation of social pension insurance policy in private enterprises under the “Ambiguity-Conflict” model[J].Chinese Public Policy Review,15(2):90-104.(in Chinese)
• 酒毓.模糊-冲突矩阵：中国情境下的政策执行模型探析[J].中国市场，2018,30:10-1.Jiu Y.2018.Fuzzy-conflict matrix:An analysis of policy implementation model in the Chinese context[J].China Market,30:10-1.(in Chinese)
• 李妮.2018.模糊性政治任务的科层运作——A县政府是如何建构“创新”政绩的?[J].公共管理学报，15:1-11+153.Li N.2018.The bureaucratic operation of unspecified political tasks—How does the county government construct “Innovation” political achievement?[J].Journal of Public Management,15:1-11+153.(in Chinese)
• 李燕，高慧，尚虎平.2020.整合性视角下公共政策冲突研究：基于多案例的比较分析[J].中国行政管理[J]:108-116.Li Y,Gao H,Shang H P.2020.Research on public policy conflict from the perspective of integration:A comparative analysis based on multiple cases[J].Chinese Public Administration:108-116.(in Chinese)
• 刘松瑞，王赫，席天扬 2020.行政竞标制、治理绩效和官员激励——基于国家卫生城市评比的研究[J].公共管理学报，17:10-20+164.Liu S,Wang H,Xi T 2020.Administrative competitive bidding,governance performance and official incentive:A study based on national health city evaluation[J].Journal of Public Management,17:10-20+164.(in Chinese)
• 蒙克，李朔严 2019.公共管理研究中的案例方法：一个误区和两种传承[J].中国行政管理，9:89-94.Meng K,Li S 2019.The case method in public management research:A misconception and two inheritances[J].Chinese Public Administration,9:89-94.(in Chinese)
• 曲博.2010.因果机制与过程追踪法[J].世界经济与政治：97-108+158-159.Qu B.2010.Causal mechanism and process tracing method[J].World Economics and Politics:97-108+158-159.(in Chinese)
• 任鹏 2015.政策冲突中地方政府的选择策略及其效应[J].公共管理学报，12:34-45+154-155.Ren P.2015.The selection strategies and effect of local government in the face of policy conflicts[J].Journal of Public Management,12:34-45+154-155.(in Chinese)
• 孙婧婧，和经纬.2020.作为溯因推理研究方法的因果过程追踪及其在公共政策研究中的应用[J].公共管理评论，2:214-229.Sun J J,He J W.2020.Causal process tracing as an abductive reasoning method and its application to public policy research:Noteworthy english publications of the season[J].China Public Administration Review,2:214-229.(in Chinese)
• 孙宗锋，孙悦.2019.组织分析视角下基层政策执行多重逻辑探析——以精准扶贫中的“表海”现象为例[J].公共管理学报，16:16-26+168-169.Sun Z F,Sun Y.2019.Multiple logical analysis of local policy implementation under the perspective of organizational analysis—Taking “amounts of tables” in the targeted poverty allevation as an example[J].Journal of Public Management,16:16-26+168-169.(in Chinese)
• 万江.2014.政策执行失灵：地方策略与中央态度[J].北方法学，8:102-111.Wan J.2014.The failure of policy implementation:Local governments' strategies and the central government's attitude[J].Northern Legal Science,8:102-111.(in Chinese)
• 王丛虎，侯宝柱，祁凡骅.2023.“高模糊—高冲突”政策实质性执行：一个创新性的中国方案——以重庆市公共资源交易服务组织“事转企”改革为例[J].公共管理学报，20:46-56+171.Wang C H,Hou B Z,Qi F H.2023.Substantive implementation of high ambiguity and high conflict policy:An innovative Chinese solution—A case study about chongqing public resource trading centers transforming into state owned enterprises[J].Journal of Public Management,20:46-56+171.(in Chinese)
• 王法硕，王如一.2021.中国地方政府如何执行模糊性政策?——基于A市“厕所革命”政策执行过程的个案研究[J].公共管理学报，18:10-21+166.Wang F S,Wang R Y.2021.How do chinese local governments implement ambiguous policy?—A case study of the “toilet revolution” policy in the city A[J].Journal of Public Management,18:10-21+166.(in Chinese)
• 王洛忠，都梦蝶.2020.“限塑令”执行因何遭遇阻滞?——基于修正后“模糊—冲突”框架的分析[J].行政论坛，27:69-80.Wang L Z,Du M D.2020.Analysis on implementation of plastic limit orders under the revised ambiguity-conflict model[J].Administrative Tribune,27:69-80.(in Chinese)
• 吴宾，齐昕.2020.如何识别政策执行中的政策模糊性与冲突性?——基于政策文献量化方法的探索性研究[J].理论学刊：101-110.Wu B,Qi X.2020.How to identify policy ambiguity and conflict in policy implementation?—Exploratory research based on quantitative methods of policy literature[J].Theory Journal:101-110.(in Chinese)
• 伍海泉，李天峰，曹轩菡.2022.高等教育政策何以遭遇执行阻滞?——基于“激励-冲突”框架的类型分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报：38-49+68.Wu H Q,Li T F,Cao X H.2022.How does the implementation block of higher education policy occur?—Type analysis based on the “Incentive-conflict” framework[J].Journal Of National Academy Of Education Administration:38-49+68.(in Chinese)
• 于文轩.2020.中国公共行政学案例研究：问题与挑战[J].中国行政管理：105-112.Yu W X.2020.Chinese public administration research methods:Problems and challenges[J].Chinese Public Administration:105-112.(in Chinese)
• 袁方成，范静惠.2022.政策执行模式的转换及其逻辑——一个拓展的“模糊—冲突”框架[J].中国行政管理：13-21.Yuan F C,Fan J H.2022.The transformation of policy implementation mode and its logic—An extended “ambiguity-conflict” framework[J].Public Administration:13-21.(in Chinese)
• 袁方成，康红军.2018.“张弛之间”:地方落户政策因何失效?——基于“模糊-冲突”模型的理解[J].中国行政管理：64-69.Yuan F C,Kang H J.2018.“Transformed between being stringent and bbeing loose”:Why local household registration policy becomes invalid?An understanding based on the ambiguity-conflict model[J].Public Administration:64-69.(in Chinese)
• 张贵群，张旭.2022.乡村人才振兴政策执行因何遇阻?——基于修正后的模糊—冲突模型解释.重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)[J],36:137-151.Zhang G Q,Zhang X.2022.why is the implementation of the rural talent revitalization policy hindered?Interpretation based on the modified fuzzy-conflict model[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science),36:137-151.(in Chinese)
• 张长东.2018.社会科学中的因果机制：微观基础和过程追踪.公共管理评论[J]:10-21.Zhang C D.2018.Casual mechanisms in the social sciences:The micro-foundation and process tracking[J].China Public Administration Review:10-21.(in Chinese)
• 张翔.2019.基层政策执行的“共识式变通”:一个组织学解释——基于市场监管系统上下级互动过程的观察[J].公共管理学报，16(4):1-11+168.Zhang X.2019.“Consensus-based Flexibility” in the Implementation of grassroots policies:An organizational approach—Based on the observation of the interaction of the market supervision system[J].Journal of Public Management,16(4):1-11+168.
• 张翔.2023.地方政府的创造性执行何以可能——基于“智慧T市”项目执行过程的个案分析[J].中国行政管理，39(9):124-31.Zhang X.2023.How is local governments' creative policy implementation possible—A case study of a smart city project in T city[J].Chinese Public Administration,39(9):124-31.
• 章文光，刘志鹏.2020.注意力视角下政策冲突中地方政府的行为逻辑——基于精准扶贫的案例分析[J].公共管理学报，17:152-162+176.Zhang W G,Liu Z P.2020.behavior for policy conflicts of local government from the perspective of attention—Case analysis based on targeted poverty alleviation[J].Journal of Public Management,17:152-162+176.(in Chinese)
• 竺乾威.2012.地方政府的政策执行行为分析：以“拉闸限电”为例[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)[J].32(2):40-46.Zhu Q W.2012.An analysis on the policy implementation behavior of local governments—With “switching out to limit power consumption” as an example[J].Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences)[J].32(2):40-46.(in Chinese)
• 庄德水.2010.公共政策失败的利益冲突因素分析[J].学术交流：21-25.Zhuang D S.2010.Analysis of conflict of interest factors in public policy failure[J].Academic Exchange:21-25.(in Chinese)
• Alexander G L,Bennett A.2005.Case studies and theory development in the social sciences[C]//Cambridge MA:MIT Press.
• Christian J,Staffan J,et al.2017.Policy implementation in the era of accelerating projectification:synthesizing matland's conflict-ambiguity model and research on temporary organizations.Public Policy and Administration[J].2019
• Ellis K.2015.Personalisation,ambiguity and conflict:matland's model of policy implementation and the ‘transformation’ of adult social care in england.Policy and Politics[J],43:239-254.
• Guo L,Ba Y H.2022.Ambiguity and conflict in pension policies implementation:evidence from China.Journal of Chinese Governance[J],7:320-339.
• Howard J Y,Wrobel S L,Nitta K A.2010.Implementing change in an urban school district:a case study of the reorganization of the little rock school district.Public Administration Review [J],70:934-941.
• Matland R E.1995.Synthesizing the implementation literature:the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory[J],5:145-174.
• Osterwaal A,Torenvlied R.2011.Policy divergence in implementation:How conflict among decisive legislators reinforces the effect of agency preferences.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory [J],22:195-217.
• Paul,A,Sabatier.1988.An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.Policy Sciences[J].
• Tummers L,Vermeeren B,Steijn B,et al.2012.Public professionals and policy implementation conceptualizing and measuring three types of role conflicts.Public Management Review[J],14:1041-1059.
• Zahariadis N,Exadaktylos T.2016.Policies that succeed and programs that fail:ambiguity,conflict,and crisis in greek higher education.Policy Studies Journal [J],44:59-82.