张俊琪,胡威

• 1:清华大学公共管理学院
• 2:中国人民大学公共管理学院
• 3:北京市组织学习与城市治理创新研究中心

摘要(Abstract)：

街头官僚是现实中的“政策重构者”,其对自由裁量权的偏好会切实影响到政府公信力与政策执行。本文聚焦于中国社会中街头官僚自由裁量权存在行政规范偏好和人情关系偏好的现象,基于人格特质理论,采用离散选择实验定量地检验了拥有思维倾向-情感倾向这两种不同人格特质的街头官僚在自由裁量权偏好选择上的差异。来自497位执法者的调查结果显示:思维倾向的街头官僚更关注行政规范偏好因素,而情感倾向的街头官僚更关注人情规范偏好因素。人情关系可以分为情感关系和社会资源交换维度,思维倾向的街头官僚比情感倾向的街头官僚更加关注人情关系给自身带来的社会资源交换。

关键词(KeyWords)： 街头官僚;人情关系;自由裁量权;人格特质;离散选择实验

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“我国机构改革过程中公务员的组织认同感研究”(项目批准号:71974193)资助

作者(Author): 张俊琪,胡威

参考文献(References)：

• 陈海春,王骢.2014.人情视角下的个人权力再分配研究[J].河南社会科学,22(3):106-111.Chen H C,Wang C.2014.Study on the Redistribution of Power from the Perspective of the Individual[J].Henan Social Sciences,22(3):106-111.(in Chinese)
• 陈那波,卢施羽.2013.场域转换中的默契互动---中国“城管”的自由裁量行为及其逻辑[J].管理世界,(10):62-80.Chen N B,Lu S Y.2013.The Tacit Agreement Based on the Changing Field:The Discretion of the City Managers of the Street level and its Logit in China'Context[J].Journal of Management World,(10):62-80.(in Chinese)
• 陈维政,任晗.2015.人情关系和社会交换关系的比较分析与管理策略研究[J].管理学报,12(6):789-798.Chen W Z,Ren H.2015.Comparison between Renqing Guanxi and social exchange relationship and exploration of their management strategies:Based on the perspective of Chinese and western culture[J].Chinese Journal of Management,12(6):789-798.(in Chinese)
• 费孝通.2019.乡土中国[M].上海:上海人民出版社.Fei X T.2019.From the soil:The Foundations of Chinese Society[M].Shanghai:Shanghai People'Publishing House.(in Chinese)
• 格林斯坦·弗雷德.2022.人格与政治:实证推论与概念化指南[M].景晓强,译.北京:中央编译出版社.
• 郭晓薇,李成彦.2015.中国人的上下级关系:整合构念的建立与初步检验[J].管理学报,12(2):167-177.Guo X W,Li C Y.2015.Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi in China:An integrative construct and the preliminary examination[J].Chinese Journal of Management,12(2):167-177.(in Chinese)
• 韩志明,孟宪斌.2018.从冲突迈向合作:城管与摊贩关系的演进及其反思[J].公共管理与政策评论,7(3):56-74.Han Z M,Meng X B.2018.From conflict to cooperation:The evolution of the relationship between urban management officers and street pedllers and its reflection[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,7(3):56-74.(in Chinese)
• 贺培育,姚选民.2015.人情:内涵、类型与特性[J].求索,(5):21-26.He P Y,Yao X M.2015.On Connotations,Types and Nature of Favors[J].Seeker,(5):21-26.(in Chinese)
• 胡赛全,刘展余,雷玉琼,等.2022.公众对助推型减碳政策的偏好研究:基于联合实验与机器学习方法[J].公共行政评论,15(3):42.Hu S Q,Liu Z Y,Lei Y Q,et al.2022.Public preference for nudge-based decarbonization policies:A conjoint experiment with machine learning approach[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(3):42.(in Chinese)
• 黄光国.2010.人情与面子---中国人的权力游戏[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.Huang G G.2010.Favor and Face:Power Game of Chinese[M].Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(in Chinese)
• 李晓玲.2007.中国人情:本土化的社会资本来源[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),20(2):42-45,55.Li X L.2007.The source of Chinese social capital:Human relationship[J].Changchun University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences),20(2):42-45,55.(in Chinese)
• 李宜钊.2015.街头官僚政策执行问题研究:文献回顾与评价[J].行政与法,(10):1-6.Li Y Z.2015.Research on the street-level bureaucrats policy implementation:Literature review and evaluation[J].Administration and Law,(10):1-6.(in Chinese)
• 刘瑞江,张业旺,闻崇炜,等.2010.正交试验设计和分析方法研究[J].实验技术与管理,27(9):52-55.Liu R J,Zhang Y W,Wen C W,et al.2010.Study on the design and analysis methods of orthogonal experiment[J].Experimental Technology and Management,27(9):52-55.(in Chinese)
• 苗丹民,皇甫恩,Chia R C,等.2000.MBTI人格类型量表的效度分析[J].心理学报,32(3):324-331.Miao D M,Huang F E,Chia R C,et al.2000.The validity analysis of the Chinese version MBTI[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,32(3):324-331.(in Chinese)
• 聂冲,贾生华.2005.离散选择模型的基本原理及其发展演进评介[J].数量经济技术经济研究,22(11):151-159.Nie C,Jia S H.2005.Research on the theoretical basis and evolution of discrete choice models[J].The Journal of Quantitative&Technical Economics,22(11):151-159.(in Chinese)
• 邵慧卓.2016.简析我国城市管理执法的行政伦理困境---基于行政自由裁量权的视角[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),24(1):71-75.Shao H Z.2016.Analysis of the ethical dilemmas in urban management law enforcement:Based on the perspective of discretion[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Social Sciences),24(1):71-75.(in Chinese)
• 孙斐,王刘娟.2021.街头官僚的道德困境:一个文献综述[J].公共管理与政策评论,10(3):158-168.Sun F,Wang L J.2021.The moral dilemmas of street-level bureaucrats:A literature review[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,10(3):158-168.(in Chinese)
• 叶娟丽,马骏.2003.公共行政中的街头官僚理论[J].武汉大学学报(社会科学版),56(5):612-618.Ye J L,Ma J.2003.Street-level-bureaucrat theory in public administration[J].Wuhan University Journal (Social Sciences),56(5):612-618.(in Chinese)
• 翟学伟.2004.人情、面子与权力的再生产---情理社会中的社会交换方式[J].社会学研究,(5):48-57.Zhai X W.2004.Favor,face and reproduction of the power:A way of social exchange in an reasonableness society[J].Sociological Studies,(5):48-57.(in Chinese)
• 曾冠球.2004.基层官僚人员裁量行为之初探:以台北市区公所组织为例[J].行政暨政策学报,38:95-140.Tseng K C.2004.An introduction to the study of discretionary actions of street-level bureaucrats:The case of twelve district offices of Taipei city government[J].Public Administration&Policy,38:95-140.(in Chinese)
• 曾维希,张进辅.2006.MBTI人格类型量表的理论研究与实践应用[J].心理科学进展,14(2):255-260.Zeng W X,Zhang J F.2006.Theory basis of MBTI and its application for practice from research[J].Advances in Psychological Science,14(2):255-260.(in Chinese)
• 赵继娣,何彦伟,汤哲群.2022.街头官僚优先处置何种任务?---一项基于离散选择实验的任务选择逻辑研究[J].公共管理与政策评论,11(4):69-84.Zhao J D,He Y W,Tang Z Q.2022.What tasks do the street-level bureaucrats prioritize?-A study on their task selection logic based on discrete choice experiments[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(4):69-84.(in Chinese)
• 郑婉菁,叶先宝.2015.街头官僚行政自由裁量权:权变、困境及其规制[J].行政与法,(10):7-13.Zheng W J,Ye X B.2015.Contingency,dilemmas and regulations of the street-level bureaucrats'administration discretion[J].Administration and Law,(10):7-13.(in Chinese)
• 朱亚鹏,刘云香.2014.制度环境、自由裁量权与中国社会政策执行---以C市城市低保政策执行为例[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),54(6):159-168.Zhu Y P,Liu Y X.2014.Institutional context,discretionary power and social policy implementation:A case study of the urban minimum living policy implementation in City C[J].Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University (Social Science Edition),54(6):159-168.(in Chinese)
• Allport G W.1961.Pattern and growth in personality[M].Oxford:Holt,Rinehart&Winston.
• Aguinis H,Bradley K J.2014.Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies[J].Organizational Research Methods,17(4):351-371.
• Bechtel M M,Scheve K F.2013.Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,110(34):13763-13768.
• Belle N,Cantarelli P.2022.Your money,your life,or your freedom?A discrete-choice experiment on trade-offs during a public health crisis[J].Public Administration Review,82(1):59-68.
• Beyler J,Schmeck R R.1992.Assessment of individual differences in preferences for holisticanalytic strategies:Evaluation of some commonly available instruments[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement,52(3):709-719.
• Boyle G J.1995.Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI):Some psychometric limitations[J].Australian Psychologist,30(1):71-74.
• Carson A D,Stalikas A,Bizot E B.1997.Correlations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and measures of aptitudes[J].Journal of Career Assessment,5(1):81-104.
• Cattell R B.1966.Validation and intensification of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire[J].Readings in clinical psychology.12(2):241-254.
• Clark M D,Determann D,Petrou S,et al.2014.Discrete choice experiments in health economics:A review of the literature[J].PharmacoEconomics,32(9):883-902.
• Coe C K.1992.The MBTI:Potential uses and misuses in personnel administration[J].Public Personnel Management,21(4):511-522.
• Cohen N,Gershgoren S.2019.Power dynamics and power asymmetries in the interaction between street-level inspectors and inspectees[M]//Van de Walle S,Raaphorst N.Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government.Switzerland:Palgrave Macmillan,125-143.
• Cohen S R.1981.Using the MBTI with teachers,supervisors,administrators,and students:Aprogram review[J].Research in Psychological Type,3:42-47.
• Dawson J F.2014.Moderation in management research:What,why,when,and how[J].Journal of Business and Psychology,29(1):1-19.
• Edwards J A,Lanning K,Hooker K.2002.The MBTI and social information processing:An incremental validity study[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,78(3):432-450.
• Ellis K,Davis A,Rummery K.1999.Needs assessment,street-level bureaucracy and the new community care[J].Social Policy&Administration,33(3):262-280.
• Eranova M,Prashantham S.2016.Decision making and paradox:Why study China?[J].European Management Journal,34(3):193-201.
• Evans T,Harris J.2004.Street-level bureaucracy,social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion[J].The British Journal of Social Work,34(6):871-895.
• Evans T.2013.Organisational rules and discretion in adult social work[J].British Journal of Social Work,43(4):739-758.
• Farh J L,Tsui A S,Xin K,et al.1998.The influence of relational demography and Guanxi:The Chinese case[J].Organization Science,9(4):471-488.
• Ford R C,Richardson W D.1994.Ethical decision making:A review of the empirical literature[J].Journal of Business Ethics,13(3):205-221.
• Furnham A.1996.The big five versus the big four:The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality[J].Personality and Individual Differences,21(2):303-307.
• Goby V P.2006.Personality and online/offline choices:MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study[J].Cyber Psychology&Behavior,9(1):5-13.
• Gonzalez C,Saner L D.2012.Thinking or feeling?:Effects of decision making personality in conflict resolution[M]//von Brinken J,Konietzny H.Emotional Gaming.Germany:Epodium,77-89.
• Guy M E,Newman M A,Mastracci S H.2014.Emotional labor:Putting the service in public service[M].New York:Routledge.
• Hainmueller J,Hopkins D J,Yamamoto T.2014.Causal inference in conjoint analysis:Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments[J].Political Analysis,22(1):1-30.
• Han Y,Altman Y.2009.Supervisor and subordinate Guanxi:A grounded investigation in the People'Republic of China[J].Journal of Business Ethics,88(S1):91-104.
• Hausman J A,Wise D A.1978.A conditional probit model for qualitative choice:Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences[J].Econometrica,46(2):403-426.
• Hood C.1995.Contemporary public management:A new global paradigm?[J].Public Policy and Administration,10(2):104-117.
• Horiuchi Y,Markovich Z,Yamamoto T.2022.Does conjoint analysis mitigate social desirability bias?[J].Political Analysis,30(4):535-549.
• Hupe P,Hill M.2007.Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability[J].Public Administration,85(2):279-299.
• Jensen D C,Pedersen L B.2017.The impact of empathy-Explaining diversity in street-level decision-making[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,27(3):433-449.
• Johnson F R,Lancsar E,Marshall D,et al.2013.Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments:Report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force[J].Value in Health,16(1):3-13.
• Jung C G.1924.Psychological types,or the psychology of individuation[M].New York:Harcourt Brace.
• Keiser L R.1999.State bureaucratic discretion and the administration of social welfare programs:The case of social security disability[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,9(1):87-106.
• Keulemans S,Groeneveld S.2020.Supervisory leadership at the frontlines:Street-level discretion,supervisor influence,and street-level bureaucrats'attitude towards clients[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,30(2):307-323.
• Kilmann R H,Thomas K W.1975.Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions[J].Psychological Reports,37(3):971-980.
• Kl?jgaard M E,Bech M,S?gaard R.2012.Designing a stated choice experiment:The value of qualitative process[J].Journal of Choice Modelling,5(2):1-18.
• Kolind T.2015.Drugs and discretionary power in prisons:The officer'perspective[J].International Journal of Drug Policy,26(9):799-807.
• Koven S G.2019.Checks on bureaucracy,organizational accountability,and organizational culture[M]//Koven S G.The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion.Switzerland:Palgrave Macmillan,67-100.
• Lancsar E,Louviere J.2008.Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making[J].PharmacoEconomics,26(8):661-677.
• Lavee E,Cohen N,Nouman H.2018.Reinforcing public responsibility?Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats'engagement in policy design[J].Public Administration,96(2):333-348.
• Lipsky M.2010.Street-level bureaucracy:Dilemmas of the individual in public services[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
• Liu Y M,Liu X Y.2018.Politics under abusive supervision:The role of Machiavellianism and guanxi[J].European Management Journal,36(5):649-659.
• Loyens K,Maesschalck J.2010.Toward a theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy:Existing models reconsidered[J].Administration&Society,42(1):66-100.
• Macdonald D A,Anderson P E,Tsagarakis C I,et al.1994.Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO personality inventory[J].Psychological Reports,74(1):339-344.
• May P J,Winter S C.2009.Politicians,managers,and street-level bureaucrats:Influences on policy implementation[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,19(3):453-476.
• McCrae R R,Costa P T Jr.1989.Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality[J].Journal of Personality,57(1):17-40.
• Merrilees B,Miller D.1999.Direct selling in the west and east:The relative roles of product and relationship (Guanxi) drivers[J].Journal of Business Research,45(3):267-273.
• Meyers M K,Vorsanger S.2007.Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy[M]//Peters B G,Pierre J.The Handbook of Public Administration:Concise Paperback Edition.London:SAGE,153-163.
• Myers I B,1962.The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Manual[M].Palo Alto,CA.:Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Nylander P?,Lindberg O,Bruhn A.2011.Emotional labour and emotional strain among Swedish prison officers[J].European Journal of Criminology,8(6):469-483.
• Pittenger D J.1993.Measuring the MBTI and coming up short[J].Journal of Career Planning and Employment,54(1):48-52.
• Podsakoff P M,MacKenzie S B,Lee J Y,et al.2003.Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5):879-903.
• Raaphorst N,Van de Walle S.2018.A signaling perspective on bureaucratic encounters:How public officials interpret signals and cues[J].Social Policy&Administration,52(7):1367-1378.
• Rinscheid A,Pianta S,Weber E U.2020.Fast track or Slo-Mo?Public support and temporal preferences for phasing out fossil fuel cars in the United States[J].Climate Policy,20(1):30-45.
• Ryan M,Bate A,Eastmond C J,et al.2001.Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences[J].Quality in Health Care,10(S1):i55-i60.
• Ryan M,Kolstad J R,Rockers P C,et al.2012.How to conduct a discrete choice experiment for health workforce recruitment and retention in remote and rural areas:A user guide with case studies[R].Washington,D.C.:The World Bank Group.
• Sandfort J R.2000.Moving beyond discretion and outcomes:Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(4):729-756.
• Scott P G.1997.Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion:An experiment in streetlevel decision making[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,7(1):35-58.
• Seegmiller R A,Epperson D L.1987.Distinguishing thinking-feeling preferences through the content analysis of natural language[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,51 (1):42-52.
• Simon H A.1957.Administrative behavior:A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization[M].New York:Macmillan.
• Tummers L,Bekkers V.2014.Policy implementation,street-level bureaucracy,and the importance of discretion[J].Public Management Review,16(4):527-547.
• Viney R,Savage E,Louviere J.2005.Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care[J].Health Economics,14(4):349-362.
• Webb E J D,Meads D,Eskyte I,et al.2018.A systematic review of discrete-choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies in people with multiple sclerosis[J].The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research,11(4):391-402.
• Yang H B,Lin Z,Peng M W.2011.Behind acquisitions of alliance partners:Exploratory learning and network embeddedness[J].Academy of Management Journal,54(5):1069-1080.
• Zhang X A,Li N,Harris T B.2015.Putting non-work ties to work:The case of guanxi in supervisor subordinate relationships[J].The Leadership Quarterly,26(1):37-54.
• (1)《中华人民共和国海关对进出境旅客行李物品监管办法》第十一条规定了海关不予放行的六类物品:(一)不属自用的;(二)超出合理数量范围的;(三)超出规定的物品品种、规格、限量、限值的;(四)未办理海关手续的;(五)未按章缴税的;(六)根据规定不能放行的其他物品。来源:http://www.customs. gov. cn/customs/302249/302266/302267/356565/index. html。
• (2)定义来自《国务院法制办关于如何确认违法行为连续或继续状态的复函》。来源:https://ssfb86. com/mobile/News/detail/newsid/10023. html。
• (3)《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》第二十九条规定:“同一个违法行为违反多个法律规范应当给予罚款处罚的,按照罚款数额高的规定处罚。”来源:https://www. gov. cn/banshi/2005-08/21/content_25101. htm。
• (1)正交实验选择的16种代表性的旅客样例的属性组合及出现频数详见附录1。