徐国冲,夏瑜

• 1:厦门大学公共事务学院
• 2:清华大学公共管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

“领导重视”并非官僚制运转的万能灵药，尤其当它遇上官僚制的软抵抗时，政策执行往往陷入阻滞。现有文献对从领导重视到官僚制积极运转，进而使得政策落地这一过程机制缺乏足够的关注。为探究上级领导的注意力与官僚制的张力问题，本文选择将其置于政策执行场域，对经典政策过程理论进行打碎与重构，建立起政策执行要素-阶段的二维分析框架。在经验层面，本文以X市学校体育设施对外开放政策的执行过程为例，从微观视角深入描绘了官僚制运转从梗阻到顺畅落地的全过程，呈现了不同政策“关键要素”在不同执行阶段的不同组合效果，从而揭示了从领导重视到政策落地的内在机制。案例研究结果表明，决策者注意力是驱动官僚制的必要条件而非充分条件，政策执行还受到问题界定、政策图景、制度性摩擦，特别是执行联盟资源等因素的影响，只有当官僚制内化认同领导重视事项时才会积极运转。而当遭遇官僚制的隐形抵制时，决策者可以运用多种资源策略驯服官僚制。本研究揭示的政策执行过程中官僚制对上级领导的反作用力，挑战了传统官僚的刻板印象，凸显了官僚组织的弹性空间，是官僚的自主性和人格化特征反制官僚组织的机械性的结果。

关键词(KeyWords)： 官僚制;领导重视;注意力;政策执行;政策过程理论

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重大项目“绩效管理导向下的中国政府成本体系研究”(项目批准号:20&ZD115)的资助

作者(Author): 徐国冲,夏瑜

参考文献(References)：

• 布赖恩·琼斯.2010.再思民主政治中的决策制定[M].李丹阳，译.北京：北京大学出版社.Jones B D.2010.Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics[M].Li D Y,trans.Beijing:Peking University Press.(trans.into Chinese)
• 陈家建.2013.项目制与基层政府动员——对社会管理项目化运作的社会学考察[J].中国社会科学，(2):64-79.Chen J J.2013.The project system and the mobilization of grass-roots government officials:A sociological study of the project-oriented operation of social management[J].Social Sciences in China,(2):64-79.(in Chinese)
• 陈家建，边慧敏，邓湘树.2013.科层结构与政策执行[J].社会学研究，28(6):1-20.Chen J J,Bian H M,Deng X S.2013.Bureaucratic structure and policy implementation[J].Sociological Studies,28(6):1-20.(in Chinese)
• 代凯.2017.注意力分配：研究政府行为的新视角[J].理论月刊，(3):107-112.Dai K.2017.Attention allocation:A new perspective on government behavior[J].Theory Monthly,(3):107-112.(in Chinese)
• 弗兰克·鲍姆加特纳，布赖恩·琼斯.2011.美国政治中的议程与不稳定性[M].曹堂哲，文雅，译.北京：北京大学出版社.Baumgartner F R,Jones B D.2011.Agendas and instability in American politics[M].Cao T Z,Wen Y,trans.Beijing:Peking University Press.(trans.into Chinese)
• 孔飞力.2012.叫魂：1768年中国妖术大恐慌[M].陈兼，刘昶，译.上海：上海三联书店.Kong F L.2012.Soulstealers:The Chinese sorcery scare of 1768[M].Chen J,Liu C,trans.Shanghai:Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore.(trans.into Chinese)
• 练宏.2016.注意力竞争——基于参与观察与多案例的组织学分析[J].社会学研究，31(4):1-26,242.Lian H.2016.Constructing the Chinese governance system:History and reality competing for attention in the Chinese bureaucracy[J].Sociology Study,31(4):1-26,242.(in Chinese)
• 刘军强，谢延会.2015.非常规任务、官员注意力与中国地方议事协调小组治理机制——基于A省A市的研究(2002～2012)[J].政治学研究，(4):84-97.Liu J Q,Xie Y H.2015.Unconventional tasks,official attention,and the governance mechanism of local deliberative coordination groups in China:A study based on City A Province A (2002—2012)[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(4):84-97.(in Chinese)
• 陆聂海.2016.从官僚制行政到民主治理：公共管理范式转换的再思考[J].行政论坛，23(2):43-47.Lu N H.2016.From bureaucratic administration to democratic governance:Rethinking the paradigm shift of public management[J].Administrative Tribune,23(2):43-47.(in Chinese)
• 罗伯特·K.莫顿.2006.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰，齐心，译.南京：译林出版社.Merton R K.2006.Social theory and social structure[M].Tang S J,Qi X,trans.Nanjing:Yilin Press.(trans.into Chinese)
• 马丁·阿尔布罗.1990.官僚制[M].阎步克，译.北京：知识出版社.Albrow M.1990.Bureaucracy[M].Yan B K,trans.Beijing:Knowledge Press.(trans.into Chinese)
• 倪星，王锐.2018.权责分立与基层避责：一种理论解释[J].中国社会科学，(5):116-135,206-207.Ni X,Wang R.2018.The separation of powers and responsibilities and avoidance of responsibility at the grass-roots level:A theoretical explanation[J].Social Sciences in China,(5):116-135,206-207.(in Chinese)
• 庞明礼.2019.领导高度重视：一种科层运作的注意力分配方式[J].中国行政管理，(4):93-99.Pang M L.2019.Leaders Attach great importance:An attention distribution approach of bureaucratic operation[J].Chinese Public Administration,(4):93-99.(in Chinese)
• 庞明礼，王晓曼.2019.“领导高度重视”式治理的绩效可持续性研究——基于对中部某县H村的观察[J].地方治理研究，(2):2-12,78.Pang M L,Wang X M.2019.Research on performance sustainability of governance highly valued by leaders—Based on the observation of village H in a central Chinese county[J].Local Governance Research,(2):2-12,78.(in Chinese)
• 孙发锋.2021.问题界定的政策效应研究：以党政领导干部兼任社会组织职务问题治理为例[J].中国行政管理，(1):79-84.Sun F F.2021.Research on the policy effect of issues definition—Taking the problem of party and government leading cadres conserving as social organizations as an example[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):79-84.(in Chinese)
• 孙雨.2019.中国地方政府“注意力强化”现象的解释框架——基于S省N市环保任务的分析[J].北京社会科学，(11):41-50.Sun Y.2019.An explanatory framework of ‘attention increase’ in Chinese local governments—A case study for environmental protection task[J].Social Sciences of Beijing,(11):41-50.(in Chinese)
• 王富伟.2012.个案研究的意义和限度——基于知识的增长[J].社会学研究，27(5):161-183,244-245.Wang F W.2012.The significance and limitation of case study:Based on the perspective of knowledge growth[J].Sociological Studies,27(5):161-183,244-245.(in Chinese)
• 文宏.2014.间段均衡理论与中国公共政策的演进逻辑——兰州出租车政策(1982—2012)的变迁考察[J].公共管理学报，11(2):70-80,142.Wen H.2014.The Punctuated-Equilibrium theory and logic evolution of China’s public policy[J].Journal of Public Management,11(2):70-80,142.(in Chinese)
• 文宏，杜菲菲.2018.注意力、政策动机与政策行为的演进逻辑——基于中央政府环境保护政策进程(2008—2015年)的考察[J].行政论坛，25(2):80-87.Wen H,Du F F.2018.The evolution logic of attention,policy motivation and policy behavior—Based on the inspection of process of central government’s environmental protection policy from 2008 to 2015[J].Administrative Tribune,25(2):80-87.(in Chinese)
• 杨志军，支广东.2020.完全还是有限：政策议程建立的型构条件与耦合机理——基于“关键个人”变量的新多源流模型解释[J].中国行政管理，(12):104-111.Yang Z J,Zhi G D.2020.Full or limited:The formational condition and coupling mechanism of the policy agenda establishment—The explanation of new multiple streams model based on “key individual” variable[J].Chinese Public Administration,(12):104-111.(in Chinese)
• 叶敏.2016.政策执行的“亮点工程”及其生产逻辑——以X市新农村建设的政策过程为讨论基础[J].甘肃行政学院学报，(6):19-30,125.Ye M.2016.The point project in policy implementation and its logic:Take the new countryside construction policy process of X City for discussion[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(6):19-30,125.(in Chinese)
• 约翰·W.金登.2017.议程、备选方案与公共政策[M].丁煌，方兴，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社.
• Kingdon J W.2017.Agendas,alternatives,and public policies[M].Ding H,Fang X,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(trans.into Chinese)
• Béland D.2005.Ideas and social policy:An institutionalist perspective[J].Social Policy & Administration,39(1):1-18.
• Béland D,Howlett M.2016.The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis[J].Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,18(3):221-227.
• Cairney P,Heikkila T.2014.A comparison of theories of the policy process[J].Theories of the Policy Process,(3):363-389.
• Howlett M.2019.Moving policy implementation theory forward:A multiple streams/critical juncture approach[J].Public Policy and Administration,34(4):405-430.
• John P.2003.Is there life after policy streams,advocacy coalitions,and punctuations:Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change?[J].Policy Studies Journal,31(4):481-498.
• Jones B D.2003.Bounded rationality and political science:Lessons from public administration and public policy[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,13(4):395-412.
• Jones B D,Sulkin T,Larsen H A.2003.Policy punctuations in American political institutions[J].American Political Science Review,97(1):151-169.
• Jones B D,Baumgartner F R.2005a.A model of choice for public policy[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(3):325-351.
• Jones B D,Baumgartner F R.2005b.The politics of attention:How government prioritizes problems[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
• Lampton D M.1987.The implementation problem in post-Mao China[M].Los Angels:University of California Press.
• Larson A D.1973.Representative bureaucracy and administrative responsibility:A reassessment[J].Midwest Review of Public Administration,7(1):79-89.
• Sabatier P A.1993.Policy change over a decade or more[M]//Sabatier P A,Jenkins-Smith H C.Policy Change and Learning:An Advocacy Coalition Approach.Boulder:Westview Press.
• Schlager E,Blomquist W.1996.A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process[J].Political Research Quarterly,49(3):651-672.
• Van Gestel N,Denis J L,Ferlie E,et al.2018.Explaining the policy process underpinning public sector reform:The role of ideas,institutions,and timing[J].Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,1(2):87-101.
• Yin R K.2009.Case study research:Design and methods:Applied social research methods[M].Los Angeles:Sage Publications,108.
• Zahariadis N.2003.Ambiguity and choice in public policy:Political decision making in modern democracies[M].Washington:Georgetown University Press.
• (1)由于政策信念尤其是深层核心信念(Deep Core Beliefs)与政策核心信念(Policy Core Beliefs)多随社会经济环境等预先安排的变化发生改变,而本文主要从行政体系内部探究政策执行,政策信念可以通过种种中间因素的作用力渗透到行政体系内部的诸要素中,潜移默化地为政策执行助力,故在此不将其作为独立因素强调。
• (2)尽管在多数情况下,负责政策执行任务的主体仅含行政官员这单一群体,但由于信念差异、部门利益等因素的存在,行政官员内部也会分化为不同的派别,这种心理和行为倾向带有明显差异,且各自具备组织协调能力的行政官员内部分化实际上可以被视为不同的执行联盟,因此本文依旧沿用倡导联盟中“联盟”一词,但是将原指来自不同系统的多方信念共同体的“倡导联盟”修改为“政策执行情境下的执行联盟”。
• (3)访谈记录编码规则:字母表示访谈人员代码,字母后面前四位数字代表年份,后四位数字代表月份和具体日期,如20210603代表2021年6月3日。