克服官僚制的想象“死区”:一种认知工具的解释Overcoming the Imaginary Bureaucratic “Dead Zone”: Explanation of a Cognitive Tool
张樯
摘要(Abstract):
官僚制想象世界的方式决定了它的治理方式,而官僚制的想象结构又受到视角和认知工具的影响。现代官僚制的治理是在理性视角下抽象建模的过程,各种治理对象被归置于特定秩序之中。由于抽象建模与复杂现实之间的紧张关系,官僚制与治理对象关于世界的想象始终存在差异,其后果便是官僚制的治理决策存在忽视治理对象具体情况的想象“死区”问题。这一问题长期以来被官僚制的技术优越性与其所掌握的结构性暴力所掩盖。随着当代治理环境的发展日益复杂,官僚制试图通过不断迭代认知工具来满足治理的客观需求并回应外界的批评。作为一种新兴的认知工具,生成式人工智能的匹配、预测功能可以增强官僚制的理性认识能力,而其所具备的交互、模拟功能将有助于官僚制超越传统的理性视角局限。特别地,生成式人工智能可以通过模拟来代替治理对象“发声”,进而促成阐释性劳动的重新分配。只要认识到这一点,生成式人工智能的治理潜能就能得到更大程度的发挥。
关键词(KeyWords): 官僚制;想象“死区”;生成式人工智能;认知工具;认知分工
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重点项目“国家治理中的非预期结果及其应对研究”(项目批准号:23AZZ013);; 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“计算政治学视角下的情动计算研究”(项目批准号:2024M761085)的资助
作者(Author): 张樯
参考文献(References):
- 大卫·格雷伯.2023.规则的悖论:想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑[M].倪谦谦,译.北京:中信出版集团.Graeber D.2023.The utopia of rules:On technology,stupidity,and the secret joys of bureaucracy[M].Ni Q Q,trans.Beijing:CITIC Press Group.(translated into Chinese)
- 戴维·约翰·法默尔.2005.公共行政的语言:官僚制、现代性和后现代性[M].吴琼,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.Farmer D J.2005.The language of public administration:Bureaucracy,modernity,and postmodernity[M].Wu Q,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(translated into Chinese)
- 邓小南,曹家齐,平田茂树.2012.文书·政令·信息沟通[M].北京:北京大学出版社.Deng X N,Cao J Q,Hirata S.2012.Documents,decrees and information communication[M].Beijing:Peking University Press.(translated into Chinese)
- 蒂莫西·米切尔.2022.再造国家:埃及在19世纪[M].张一哲,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.Mitchell T.2022.Colonising Egypt[M].Zhang Y Z,trans.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company.(translated into Chinese)
- 杜月.2017.制图术:国家治理研究的一个新视角[J].社会学研究,32(5):192-217.Du Y.2017.Cartography:A new framework of national governance[J].Sociological Studies,32(5):192-217.(in Chinese)
- 郭佳良.2017.应对“棘手问题”:公共价值管理范式的源起及其方法论特征[J].中国行政管理,(11):111-117.Guo J L.2017.Coping with “wicked problem”:The origin and methodological characteristics of public value management paradigm[J].Chinese Public Administration,(11):111-117.(in Chinese)
- 凯西·奥尼尔.2018.算法霸权:数学杀伤性武器的威胁[M].马青玲,译.北京:中信出版集团.O'Neil C.2018.Weapons of math destruction:How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy[M].Ma Q L,trans.Beijing:CITIC Press Group.(in Chinese)
- 康德.2004.纯粹理性批判[M].邓晓芒,译.北京:人民出版社.Kant I.2004.Kritik der reinen vernunft[M].Deng X M,trans.Beijing:People's Publishing House.(translated into Chinese)
- 林民望.2015.西方繁文缛节研究前沿挈领——基于SSCI代表性文献的研究[J].公共行政评论,8(5):154-172.Lin M W.2015.The cutting-edge research on red tape:Review of SSCI representative literatures[J].Journal of Public Administration,8(5):154-172.(in Chinese)
- 吕俊延,刘燚飞.2023.国家的“视力”:技术革命与国家信息能力建构[J].政治学研究,(5):97-113,209.Lü J Y,Liu Y F.2023.The vision of the state:Technological revolution and state information capacity building[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(5):97-113,209.(in Chinese)
- 蒙克,路畅.2023.价值理性与韦伯式官僚制构建——基于英普比较的历史视野[J].学术月刊,55(3):140-150,161.Meng K,Lu C.2023.Substantive rationality and the formation of Weberian bureaucracy—A historical comparative analysis of bureaucratization in 19th century Britain and Prussia[J].Academic Monthly,55(3):140-150,161.(translated into Chinese)
- 施路赫特.2004.理性化与官僚化:对韦伯之研究与诠释[M].顾忠华,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社.Schluchter W.2004.Rationalismus der weltbeherrschung:Studien zu Max Weber[M].Gu Z H,trans.Guilin:Guangxi Normal University Press.(in Chinese)
- 王雨磊.2016.数字下乡:农村精准扶贫中的技术治理[J].社会学研究,31(6):119-142,244.Wang Y L.2016.Dripping the digits down:Technical governance in the rural targeted poverty alleviation[J].Sociological Studies,31(6):119-142,244.(in Chinese)
- 韦伯.2004.韦伯作品集-Ⅲ-支配社会学[M].简惠美,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社.Weber M.2024.Herrschaftssoziologie[M].Jian H M,trans.Guilin:Guangxi Normal University Press.(translated into Chinese)
- 吴进进,何包钢.2023.算法科层制的兴起及其形态[J].社会学研究,38(6):40-60.Wu J J,He B G.2023.The rise of algorithmic bureaucracy and its typology[J].Sociological Studies,38(6):40-60.(in Chinese)
- 詹姆斯·C.斯科特.2019a.国家的视角:那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社.Scott J C.2019a.Seeing like a state:How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed[M].Wang X Y,trans.Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press.(translated into Chinese)
- 詹姆斯·C.斯科特.2019b.六论自发性:自主、尊严,以及有意义的工作和游戏[M].袁子奇,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社.Scott J C.2019b.Two cheers for anarchism:Six easy pieces on autonomy,dignity,and meaningful work[M].Yuan Z Q,trans.Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press.(translated into Chinese)
- Castoriadis C.1997.The Castoriadis reader[M].Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers.
- Latour B.1986.Visualization and cognition:Thinking with eyes and hands[J].Knowledge and Society,6:1-40.
- Park J S,O'Brien J,Cai C J,et al.2023.Generative agents:Interactive simulacra of human behavior[C]//Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.San Francisco:ACM,1-22.
- Seaver N.2021.Seeing like an infrastructure:Avidity and difference in algorithmic recommendation[J].Cultural Studies,35(4/5):771-791.
- Timmermans S,Epstein S.2010.A world of standards but not a standard world:Toward a sociology of standards and standardization[J].Annual Review of Sociology,36:69-89.