许愉,吕晓俊

• 1:上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院

摘要(Abstract)：

行政责任作为公共管理领域关注的重点议题，不仅是实现政府善治的必要条件，也是公务员行政的基本准则。本研究运用系统文献综述法对146篇中英文文献进行计量分析，描述了公务员行政责任的研究概况，梳理了行政责任的概念内涵与理论基础。通过对既有研究的深度分析，本文构建了公务员行政责任影响逻辑的全景框架，从“个体-制度-情境-任务-技术”五维视角归纳了行政责任的影响因素，剖析了“内生-外源”交互作用下履行责任的影响机制，并分析了当前公务员行政责任治理面临的挑战。基于此，本研究展望了未来行政责任的研究议题，为该领域的前沿探索与实践进步提供了知识图谱，有助于推动该领域研究的纵深发展。

关键词(KeyWords)： 行政责任;影响机制;人工智能嵌入;公务员;系统文献综述

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 许愉,吕晓俊

参考文献(References)：

• 邓大才.2020.反向避责：上位转嫁与逐层移责——以地方政府改革创新过程为分析对象[J].理论探讨，(2):157-162.Deng D C.2020.Reverse avoidance of responsibility:Transfer of responsibility to superiors and level by level-study on the innovation process of local government Reform[J].Theoretical Investigation,(2):157-162.(in Chinese)
• 范笑仙，李春梅.2006.从行政责任到公共伦理：行政自主性构建[J].中国行政管理，(5):48-49.Fan X X,Li C M.2006.From administrative responsibility to public ethics:The construction of administrative autonomy[J].Chinese Public Administration,(5):48-49.(in Chinese)
• 高童非.2023.论自动化行政中的“算法卸责”[J].电子政务，(2):115-128.Gao T F.2023.On “algorithmic offloading” in automated administration[J].E-Government,(2):115-128.(in Chinese)
• 郭巍青，张艺.2021.责任风险视域下的避责行为：要素、情境及逻辑[J].公共行政评论，14(4):137-154,199-200.Guo W Q,Zhang Y.2021.Blame avoidance from the perspective of liability risk:Elements,situations,and shaping logic[J].Journal of Public Administration,14(4):137-154,199-200.(in Chinese)
• 李贺楼.2021.基层官员的背锅风险由何而来——聚焦于基层特种设备安全监管的研究[J].公共管理学报，18(1):45-54,169.Li H L.2021.Why the street-level bureaucrats have to bear the risk of “Beiguo”—Empirical research on the street-level enforcement of special equipment safety regulation[J].Journal of Public Management,18(1):45-54,169.(in Chinese)
• 李华胤.2021.责任认知与基层干部有效回应的关系机制——两个案例的比较分析[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),43(2):63-70.Li H Y.2021.The relationship between responsibility cognition and effective response of grass-roots cadres—A comparative analysis of two cases[J].Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),43(2):63-70.(in Chinese)
• 李沫.2022.风险治理情境下基层政府的责任逻辑：基本范畴、现实样态与实践进路[J].行政论坛，29(2):74-80.Li M.2022.The responsibility logic of grassroots government in the context of risk governance:Basic category,real status and practical approach[J].Administrative Tribune,29(2):74-80.(in Chinese)
• 李晓飞.2019.行政发包制下的府际联合避责：生成、类型与防治[J].中国行政管理，(10):94-100.Li X F.2019.Coalition blame avoidance among local governments under administrative subcontract:Generation,type and prevention[J].Chinese Public Administration,(10):94-100.(in Chinese)
• 李延伟，徐陈璧.2024.公共行政中的感知问责：分析框架与研究展望[J].公共行政评论，17(1):178-195,200.Li Y W,Xu C B.2024.Felt accountability in public administration:Analytic framework and research agenda[J].Journal of Public Administration,17(1):178-195,200.(in Chinese)
• 李兆友，师容.2014.公务员行政决策伦理思考的嬗变——从行政责任到公共利益[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),42(4):92-96.Li Z Y,Shi R.2014.Reflection upon ethical orientation in administrative decision-making[J].Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences),42(4):92-96.(in Chinese)
• 梁玉柱.2021.可接受的问责：地方官员为何“铤而走险”?——基于棚户区改造中政府强拆案例分析[J].公共管理学报，18(2):34-44,166.Liang Y Z.2021.Acceptable accountability:Why do local officials take risks?—Case study on forced demolition in slum reconstruction in China[J].Journal of Public Management,18(2):34-44,166.(in Chinese)
• 林荣全.2021.数字化时代街头官僚的责任性：分析框架与研究展望[J].电子政务，(10):92-104.Lin R Q.2021.Responsibility of street bureaucrats in the digital era:Analytical framework and research prospects[J].E-Government,(10):92-104.(in Chinese)
• 刘滨，许玉镇.2021.权责失衡与剩余权配置：基层减负进程中的 “问责悖论”[J].求实，(3):19-35.Liu B,Xu Y Z.2021.Imbalance between rights and responsibilities and the allocation of residual rights:“Accountability paradox” in the process of reducing burdens on community-level government[J].Truth Seeking,(3):19-35.(in Chinese)
• 刘泽照.2021.突发事件应急管理中的官员避责行为及纠治[J].中国行政管理，(5):138-145.Liu Z Z.2021.Accountability-evasion behavior for officials in China emergency management and its targeted governance[J].Chinese Public Administration,(5):138-145.(in Chinese)
• 倪星，王锐.2018.权责分立与基层避责：一种理论解释[J].中国社会科学，(5):116-135,206-207.Ni X,Wang R.2018.The separation of powers and responsibilities and avoidance of responsibility at the grass-roots level:A theoretical explanation[J].Social Sciences in China,(5):116-135,206-207.(in Chinese)
• 潘桐.2023.流动的责任边界：基层政府的业务与政治[J].社会，43(3):135-161.Pan T.2023.Fluid boundaries of responsibility:The business and politics of grassroots government[J].Chinese Journal of Sociology,43(3):135-161.(in Chinese)
• 彭宗超，祝哲.2018.危机决策者避责策略的四种模式及关键影响因素分析[J].上海行政学院学报，19(4):93-101.Peng Z C,Zhu Z.2018.Leader's four blame avoidance strategies in crises and key factors analysis[J].The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute,19(4):93-101.(in Chinese)
• 齐晨然，陆亚娜.2023.风险、制度与激励：官员避责策略的解释性框架——以A区应急管理局为例[J].江海学刊，(3):158-165.Qi C R,Lu Y N.2023.Risk,institutions,and incentives:An explanatory framework for officials' avoidance strategies—A case study of emergency management bureau in area A[J].Jianghai Academic Journal,(3):158-165.(in Chinese)
• 盛明科，罗娟.2018.基层官员“为官不为”的产生机理及治理对策[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),21(4):89-94.Sheng M K,Luo J.2018.The producing mechanism of the phenomenon and countermeasures of grassroots officials' neglect of their duties[J].Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Social Science Edition),21(4):89-94.(in Chinese)
• 盛明科，陈廷栋.2020.公共危机情态下地方官员避责行为的生成机理与化解对策[J].北京行政学院学报，(5):21-29.Sheng M K,Chen T D.2020.The reason for the arising of local officials' avoidance of responsibility in the condition of public crisis and the solutions[J].Journal of Beijing Administration Institute,(5):21-29.(in Chinese)
• 盛明科，孟俏俏.2022.基层干部“为官不为”行为的伦理规制[J].学习与探索，(6):54-62.Sheng M K,Meng Q Q.2022.Ethical regulation of grassroots cadres' behavior of “Being official but not being official”[J].Study & Exploration,(6):54-62.(in Chinese)
• 盛明科，孟俏俏.2023.基层治理过程中“责任甩锅”的生成机制与治理策略——基于“制度-行为”的分析框架[J].社会科学研究，(4):21-31.Sheng M K,Meng Q Q.2023.The generation mechanism and governance strategy of “Blame dumping” In the process of grassroots governance—Based on the analysis framework of “Institutional-behavior”[J].Social Science Research,(4):21-31.(in Chinese)
• 石东伟.2023.相容性问责：履责视域下问责的优化路径[J].公共治理研究，35(2):52-61.Shi D W.2023.Compatibility accountability:An optimized approach to accountability in spectrum of taking responsibilities[J].Public Governance Research,35(2):52-61.(in Chinese)
• 田先红.2021a.属地管理与基层避责：一种理论解释——基于理性选择制度主义的分析[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),43(2):53-62.Tian X H.2021a.Local-oriented management and grassroots blame avoidance:A theoretical explanation—From the perspective of rational choice institutionalism[J].Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),43(2):53-62.(in Chinese)
• 田先红.2021b.基层政府卸责行为的逻辑及其治理[J].求索，(5):96-101.Tian X H.2021b.The Logic and Solution of the Shirking Behavior of Grassroots Government[J].Seeker,(5):96-101.(in Chinese)
• 田先红.2022.问责何以导致避责：技术治理中的责任运行机制研究——以12345市民服务热线的基层实践为分析对象[J].理论与改革，(6):80-95.Tian X H.2022.How accountability leads to blame avoidance:Research on responsibility mechanism in technology governance—Taking the grassroots practice of 12345 citizen service hotline as the object of analysis[J].Theory and Reform,(6):80-95.(in Chinese)
• 涂文燕，公婷.2022.控制型问责可否有效遏制避责行为?——基于官员行为与制度规范的内在逻辑分析[J].行政论坛，29(5):52-60.Tu W Y,Gong T.2022.Can control-based accountability effectively prevent blame avoidance?—An analysis of the inner logic of official behavior and institutional regulation[J].Administrative Tribune,29(5):52-60.(in Chinese)
• 王英，魏姝，吴少微，等.2022.场域理论下公务员避责行为生成机制的实证研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),28(5):167-181.Wang Y,Wei S,Wu S W,et al.2022.An empirical study on the generation mechanism of civil servants' blame avoidance behavior under the field theory[J].Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences),28(5):167-181.(in Chinese)
• 吴海红，吴安戚.2020.基层减负背景下“责任甩锅”现象透视及其治理路径[J].治理研究，36(5):50-56.Wu H H,Wu A Q.2020.Perspective of “Responsibility rejection” Phenomenon and its governance path under the background of grassroots burden reduction[J].Governance Studies,36(5):50-56.(in Chinese)
• 武永超.2021.公共服务动机的中介作用与风险感知的调节作用[J].北京社会科学，(10):97-107.Wu Y C.2021.The mediating role of public service motivation and the moderating role of risk perception[J].Social Sciences of Beijing,(10):97-107.(in Chinese)
• 肖梦黎.2023.算法行政责任的分布式重建[J].国家检察官学院学报，31(2):42-56.Xiao M L.2023.Distributed reconstruction of the responsibility in algorithmic administration[J].Journal of National Prosecutors College,31(2):42-56.(in Chinese)
• 谢治菊，许文朔.2020.扶贫责任异化：职责同构下的层层加码与消解[J].山东社会科学，(1):74-81,90.Xie Z J,Xu W S.2020.Responsibility alienation in poverty relief:Layers of overcharge and dissipation under the isologue of duty and responsiblity[J].Shandong Social Sciences,(1):74-81,90.(in Chinese)
• 徐邦友.2005.论官员非自主行为的责任界定[J].中国行政管理，(3):19-22.Xu B Y.2005.On the definition of responsibility for involuntary acts of officials[J].Chinese Public Administration,(3):19-22.(in Chinese)
• 许玉镇.2020.避责与剩余控制权：决策避责类型及治理研究[J].政治学研究，(4):27-37,125-126.Xu Y Z.2020.Avoidance of liability and residual reights of control:Types and governance of the avoidance of decision-making liability[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(4):27-37,125-126.(in Chinese)
• 颜佳华，王张华.2019.人工智能场景下公共行政技术责任审视[J].理论探索，(3):88-94.Yan J H,Wang Z H.2019.A survey of technical responsibility of public administration under the artificial intelligence scenario[J].Theoretical Exploration,(3):88-94.(in Chinese)
• 叶紫蒙，马奔，马永驰.2022.危机管理中政府官员避责的结构性差异——以新冠疫情防控期间的问责为例[J].中国行政管理，(2):149-155.Ye Z M,Ma B,Ma Y C.2022.Structural differences of government officials' Avoiding responsibility in crisis management—Take COVID-19's accountability as an example[J].Chinese Public Administration,(2):149-155.(in Chinese)
• 于文轩，林荣全.2021.责任性与避责：公共行政学研究的大问题[J].甘肃行政学院学报，(1):4-13,124.Yu W X,Lin R Q.2021.Accountability and blame avoidanc:Big questions of public administration[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(1):4-13,124.(in Chinese)
• 张力伟.2018.从共谋应对到“分锅”避责：基层政府行为新动向——基于一项环境治理的案例研究[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),39(6):30-35.Zhang L W.2018.From collusion coping to sub-pot resilience:New trends in grassroots government behavior—Based on a case study of environmental governance[J].Inner Mongolia Social Sciences,39(6):30-35.(in Chinese)
• 张力伟.2023.公共行政中的“行动”问题重思——基层治理中“责任陷阱”的化解之道[J].理论月刊，(7):19-28.Zhang L W.2023.Rethinking the “Action” Issue in public administration:Resolving the “Responsibility trap” In grassroots governance[J].Theory Monthly,(7):19-28.(in Chinese)
• 张乾友.2022a.专栏导语：政府行为中的能动性与反应性[J].公共行政评论，15(6):1-3.Zhang Q Y.2022a.Introduction:Agency and reactivity in governmental behavior[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(6):1-3.(in Chinese)
• 张乾友.2022b.问责、透明化与当代政府的责任困境[J].公共行政评论，15(6):4-20,196.Zhang Q Y.2022b.Accountability,transparency and the responsibility dilemma of contemporary government[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(6):4-20,196.(in Chinese)
• 章文光，刘志鹏.2020.注意力视角下政策冲突中地方政府的行为逻辑——基于精准扶贫的案例分析[J].公共管理学报，17(4):152-162,176.Zhang W G,Liu Z P.2020.Behavior for policy conflicts of local government from the perspective of attention—Case analysis based on targeted poverty alleviation[J].Journal of Public Management,17(4):152-162,176.(in Chinese)
• 张雪帆.2020.大数据时代行政责任的挑战与机遇[J].行政论坛，27(3):56-62.Zhang X F.2020.The challenges and opportunities of administrative responsibility in the era of big data[J].Administrative Tribune,27(3):56-62.(in Chinese)
• 赵聚军，张昊辰.2022.被动担责与集体共谋：基层官员问责应对策略的类型学考察[J].江苏社会科学，(1):125-136.Zhao J J,Zhang H C.2022.Passive responsibility and collective collusion:A typological study of the accountability coping strategies of grassroots-level officials[J].Jiangsu Social Sciences,(1):125-136.(in Chinese)
• 祝哲，张楠，邵安.2021.打破危机决策避责困境之道——基于制度主义视角的K县案例研究[J].中国行政管理，(12):126-135.Zhu Z,Zhang N,Shao A.2021.The way to break blame avoidance dilemma—A case study of County K from the institutionalist perspective[J].Chinese Public Administration,(12):126-135.(in Chinese)
• Aleksovska M.2021.Accountable for what?The effect of accountability standard specification on decision-making behavior in the public sector[J].Public Performance & Management Review,44(4):707-734.
• Aleksovska M,Schillemans T,Grimmelikhuijsen S.2022.Management of multiple accountabilities through setting priorities:Evidence from a cross-national conjoint experiment[J].Public Administration Review,82(1):132-146.
• Aleksovska M,Schillemans T.2022.Dissecting multiple accountabilities:A problem of multiple forums or of conflicting demands?[J].Public Administration,100(3):711-736.
• Alon-Barkat S,Busuioc M.2023.Human-AI interactions in public sector decision making:“Automation bias” And “selective adherence” To algorithmic advice[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,33(1):153-169.
• Bouwman R,van Thiel S,van Deemen A,et al.2018.Accountability and coalitions:Evidence from a negotiation experiment[J].Public Administration Review,78(1):37-47.
• Bovens M.2007.Analysing and assessing accountability:A conceptual framework[J].European Law Journal,13(4):447-468.
• Bracci E.2023.The loopholes of algorithmic public services:An “intelligent” Accountability research agenda[J].Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal,36(2):739-763.
• Brandsma G J,Schillemans T.2013.The accountability cube:Measuring accountability[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,23(4):953-975.
• Busuioc M,Lodge M.2017.Reputation and accountability relationships:Managing accountability expectations through reputation[J].Public Administration Review,77(1):91-100.
• Busuioc M.2021.Accountable artificial intelligence:Holding algorithms to account[J].Public Administration Review,81(5):825-836.
• Campbell J W.2018.Felt responsibility for change in public organizations:General and sector-specific paths[J].Public Management Review,20(2):232-253.
• Chen Y C,Ahn M J,Wang Y F.2023.Artificial intelligence and public values:Value impacts and governance in the public sector[J].Sustainability,15(6):4796.
• Chen Y F.2021.The impact of responsibility delegation on policy and practice implementation:A contingency approach[J].Public Performance & Management Review,44(4):842-867.
• Dicke L A.2002.Ensuring accountability in human services contracting[J].The American Review of Public Administration,32(4):455-470.
• Eckardt S.2008.Political accountability,fiscal conditions and local government performance—Cross-sectional evidence from Indonesia[J].Public Administration and Development,28(1):1-17.
• Eckhouse L.2022.Metrics management and bureaucratic accountability:Evidence from policing[J].American Journal of Political Science,66(2):385-401.
• Engin Z,Treleaven P.2019.Algorithmic government:Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies[J].The Computer Journal,62(3):448-460.
• Filgueiras F.2022.New pythias of public administration:Ambiguity and choice in AI systems as challenges for governance[J].AI & Society,37(4):1473-1486.
• Grabner-Kr?uter S,Tafolli F,Breitenecker R J.2023.Consequences of public sector employees' CSR perceptions in a developing country:Organizational benefits and beyond[J].Public Performance & Management Review,46(2):472-511.
• Gupta P,Thakur M,Chakrabarti B.2022.Betwixt agency and accountability:Re-visioning street-level bureaucrats[J].Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance,(26):94-113.
• Hall A T,Ferris G R.2011.Accountability and extra-role behavior[J].Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,23(2):131-144.
• Han Y,Hong S.2019.The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the U.S.Federal government:The moderating role of autonomy[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,39(1):3-23.
• Han Y,Perry J L.2020.Conceptual bases of employee accountability:A psychological approach[J].Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,3(4):288-304.
• Han Y,Robertson P J.2021.Public employee accountability:An empirical examination of a nomological network[J].Public Performance & Management Review,44(3):494-522.
• Hupe P,Hill M.2007.Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability[J].Public Administration,85(2):279-299.
• Hyndman N S,Anderson R.1998.Performance information,accountability and executive agencies[J].Public Money & Management,18(3):23-30.
• Jarvis M D.2014.The black box of bureaucracy:Interrogating accountability in the public service[J].Australian Journal of Public Administration,73(4):450-466.
• Kam C.2000.Not just parliamentary ‘cowboys and Indians’:Ministerial responsibility and bureaucratic drift[J].Governance,13(3):365-392.
• Koppell J G S.2005.Pathologies of accountability:ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”[J].Public Administration Review,65(1):94-108.
• Lavee E,Cohen N,Nouman H.2018.Reinforcing public responsibility?Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats' engagement in policy design[J].Public Administration,96(2):333-348.
• Lavee E.2021.Who is in charge?The provision of informal personal resources at the street level[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,31(1):4-20.
• Lerner J S,Tetlock P E.1999.Accounting for the effects of accountability[J].Psychological Bulletin,125(2):255-275.
• Li Y R,Fan Y Y,Nie L.2025.Making governance agile:Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in China's local governance[J].Public Policy and Administration,40(2):276-301.
• Li Y W.2024.Is hierarchy the only answer?The accountability preferences of Chinese public employees in public service delivery[J].Review of Policy Research,41(3):531-549.
• Lupson J,Partington D.2011.Individual civil servants' conceptions of accountability[J].Public Management Review,13(7):895-918.
• Manaf H A,Mohamed A M,Harvey W S.2023.Citizen perceptions and public servant accountability of local government service delivery in Malaysia[J].International Journal of Public Administration,46(12):823-832.
• Nielsen P A,Moynihan D P.2017.How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for performance?Negativity bias and interest group advocacy[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,27(2):269-283.
• Novelli C,Taddeo M,Floridi L.2024.Accountability in artificial intelligence:What it is and how it works[J].AI & Society,39(4):1871-1882.
• Overman S,Schillemans T,Grimmelikhuijsen S.2021.A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector:Gauging the account holder's legitimacy and expertise[J].Public Management Review,23(12):1748-1767.
• Overman S,Schillemans T.2022.Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability[J].Public Administration Review,82(1):12-22.
• Pivoras S,Kaselis M.2019.The impact of client status on street-level bureaucrats' identity and informal accountability[J].Public Integrity,21(2):182-194.
• Poulsen B.2009.Competing traditions of governance and dilemmas of administrative accountability:The case of Denmark[J].Public Administration,87(1):117-131.
• Radin B A,Romzek B S.1996.Accountability expectations in an intergovernmental arena:The national rural development partnership[J].Publius:The Journal of Federalism,26(2):59-81.
• Reichborn-Kjennerud K.2013.Political accountability and performance audit:The case of the auditor general in Norway[J].Public Administration,91(3):680-695.
• Ridley F F.1987.What are the duties and responsibilities of civil servants?[J].Public Administration,65(1):79-87.
• Romzek B S,LeRoux K,Blackmar J M.2012.A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors[J].Public Administration Review,72(3):442-453.
• Schillemans T,Busuioc M.2015.Predicting public sector accountability:From agency drift to forum drift[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,25(1):191-215.
• Schillemans T.2016.Calibrating public sector accountability:Translating experimental findings to public sector accountability[J].Public Management Review,18(9):1400-1420.
• Schillemans T,Overman S,Fawcett P,et al.2021.Understanding felt accountability[J].Governance,34(3):893-916.
• Selten F,Robeer M,Grimmelikhuijsen S.2023.‘Just like i thought’:Street-level bureaucrats trust AI recommendations if they confirm their professional judgment[J].Public Administration Review,83(2):263-278.
• Shahan A M,Jahan F,Khair R.2021.A glimpse of light in darkness:Performance-based accountability in Bangladesh public administration[J].Public Administration and Development,41(4):191-202.
• Thomann E,Hupe P,Sager F.2018.Serving many masters:Public accountability in private policy implementation[J].Governance,31(2):299-319.
• Tran A C,Luu T T,Trinh N K,et al.2023.How do normative public values promote service innovative behavior in public organizations:The roles of felt responsibility for change and responsible leadership[J].Public Performance & Management Review,46(5):1207-1236.
• Tu W Y.2024.Unpacking the accoun