张书维,张子露,邹伟

• 1:中山大学中国公共管理研究中心/政治与公共事务管理学院
• 2:广东省珠海市香洲区横琴镇荷塘社区
• 3:中南财经政法大学收入分配与现代财政研究院/教育部“111计划”收入分配与现代财政学科创新引智基地

摘要(Abstract)：

社会许可是受项目影响地区的利益相关者对于该项目的持续接受和支持程度，如何在邻避项目中获得社会认可已成为困扰公共治理的重要难题。引发冲突的因素复杂多样。本文基于行为公共管理学的社会许可概念，将获得邻避项目的社会许可作为研究目标，从社会公平视角出发考察全过程人民民主理念在获得社会许可中的关键作用。基于B县垃圾焚烧项目案例和心理学实验(N=820)分析发现，作为全过程人民民主理念的重要维度，社会公平对于社会许可具有核心影响。具体而言，决策过程的程序公平和执行过程的分配公平均可助推社会许可，而政府信任和风险感知起到双重调节作用。研究还显示，公众获得感的增强是获得社会许可的长效机制。因此，社会公平需要和与之匹配的个体主观认知相辅相成，才能最终化解邻避冲突，实现社会许可。本研究为全过程人民民主理念提供了经验证据和数据支持。

关键词(KeyWords)： 全过程人民民主;社会公平;邻避项目;社会许可;混合设计

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目“‘放管服’改革与微观经济增长——以机场管理体制变革为例”(项目批准号:2023T160733);; 北大-林肯中心研究基金项目“统一大市场与包容性增长——基于末端基础设施建设的视角”(项目批准号:FS09-20231001-ZW);; 国家社会科学基金青年项目“行为公共管理学视角下群体性事件的‘输入-输出’机制研究”(项目批准号:18CGL043)资助

作者(Author): 张书维,张子露,邹伟

参考文献(References)：

• 曹芳.2016.经济民主思想研究[M].北京：知识产权出版社，80-98.Cao F.2016.Study on the Ideology of Economic Democracy[M].Beijing:Intellectual Property Publishing House,80-98.(in Chinese)
• 陈曦.2021.领导干部之间邻避冲突的本质、特征与化解[J].领导科学，(19):83-86.Chen X.2021.The essence,characteristics and resolution of NIMBY conflict among leading cadres[J].Leadership Science,(19):83-86.(in Chinese)
• 丁志刚，张书华.2023.全过程人民民主：一个系统性文献综述[J].学习论坛，(1):61-72.Ding Z G,Zhang S H.2023.The Whole-Process People's Democracy:A systematic literature review[J].Tribune of Study,(1):61-72.(in Chinese)
• 樊鹏.2021.全过程人民民主：具有显著制度优势的高质量民主[J].政治学研究，(4):3-10.Fan P.2021.Whole-Process People's Democracy:High-quality democracy with significant institutional advantages[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(4):3-10.(in Chinese)
• 高勇.2014.参与行为与政府信任的关系模式研究[J].社会学研究，29(5):98-119.Gao Y.2014.Pattern identification of relationships between participation and trust in government[J].Sociological Studies,29(5):98-119.(in Chinese)
• 何欣遥，徐敏，严伟鑫，等.2023.邻避型基础设施项目社会接受研究新范式：社会许可经营[J].经营与管理，(4):163-168.He X Y,Xu M,Yan W X,et al.2023.A new paradigm for social acceptance studies of NIMBY infrastructure projects:Social licensing[J].Management and Administration,(4):163-168.(in Chinese)
• 胡象明，王锋.2014.一个新的社会稳定风险评估分析框架：风险感知的视角[J].中国行政管理，(4):102-108.Hu X M,Wang F.2014.A new social stability risk assessment analysis framework:Risk perception perspective[J].Chinese Public Administration,(4):102-108.(in Chinese)
• 黄河，杨小涵，王芳菲.2023.由风险感知到集体行动——重大突发公共卫生事件中公众社交媒体的摇摆使用与作用机制[J].新闻与传播研究，30(2):37-52.Huang H,Yang X H,Wang F F.2023.From risk perception to collective preventive behaviors:Social media swinging and its functional mechanism in public health emergency[J].Journalism & Communication,30(2):37-52.(in Chinese)
• 季程远，胡悦.2022.经济发展与纵向获得感——基于全球面板数据的分析[J].公共行政评论，15(2):4-21.Ji C Y,Hu Y.2022.Economic development and temporal relative acquisition:Evidence from a global dataset[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(2):4-21.(in Chinese)
• 江泽林.2021.“两会制”民主视域下的人民政协——全过程人民民主的重要政治制度[J].中国社会科学，(12):110-130.Jiang Z L.2021.The Chinese people's political consultative conference seen from the democratic horizon of the “Two Sessions System”:The important political institution of Whole-Process People's Democracy[J].Social Sciences in China,(12):110-130.(in Chinese)
• 刘桂芝，王春鑫.2023.社会公平感、政治绩效感如何影响政治参与行为——基于CSS2019数据的实证研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),(1):19-30.Liu G Z,Wang C X.2023.How does sense of social justice and sense of political performance influence political participation:An empirical research based on CSS2019 data[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Sciences),(1):19-30.(in Chinese)
• 刘海龙.2022.环境权的内在紧张：邻避冲突的深层诱因及其纾解路径探析[J].领导科学，(7):134-138.Liu H L.2022.Inherent tensions of environmental rights:The underlying causes of NIMBY conflict and the paths to their resolution[J].Leadership Science,(7):134-138.(in Chinese)
• 刘九勇.2021.全过程人民民主的传统思想渊源[J].政治学研究，(4):18-26.Liu J Y.2021.The traditional ideological origin of Whole-Process People's Democracy[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(4):18-26.(in Chinese)
• 毛春梅，蔡阿婷.2020.邻避运动中的风险感知、利益结构分布与嵌入式治理[J].治理研究，36(2):81-89.Mao C M,Cai A T.2020.Risk perception,benefit structure distribution and embedded governance in the NIMBY movement:Based on Hangzhou Jiufeng waste incineration project[J].Governance Studies,36(2):81-89.(in Chinese)
• 孟天广，杨平，苏政.2015.转型中国的公民意见与地方财政决策——基于对地方政府的调查实验[J].公共管理学报，12(3):57-68.Meng T G,Yang P,Su Z.2015.Public opinion and local fiscal decision making in authoritarian China:Based on survey experiment to local government[J].Journal of Public Management,12(3):57-68.(in Chinese)
• 莫纪宏.2021.在法治轨道上有序推进“全过程人民民主”[J].中国法学，(6):5-24.Mo J H.2021.Promoting “People's Democracy in the Whole Process” in an orderly manner on the path of the rule of law[J].China Legal Science,(6):5-24.(in Chinese)
• 倪克金，刘修岩，梁文泉.2022.数字接入与地方政府信任：兼论接触沟通是提升信任的有效方法吗?[J].经济学报，9(4):216-242.Ni K J,Liu X Y,Liang W Q.2022.Digital access and local government trust:Is contact an effective way to improve trust?[J].China Journal of Economics,9(4):216-242.(in Chinese)
• 任岳鹏.2009.哈贝马斯：协商对话的法律[M].哈尔滨：黑龙江大学出版社，167-173.Ren Y P.2009.Habermas:The Law of Consultative Dialogue[M].Harbin:Heilongjiang University Press,167-173.(in Chinese)
• 桑玉成.2023.准确把握全过程人民民主的深刻内涵和重要意义[J].上海市社会主义学院学报，(1):1-6.Sang Y C.2023.Accurately grasping the profound connotation and significance of Whole-Process People's Democracy[J].Journal of Shanghai Institute of Socialism,(1):1-6.(in Chinese)
• 沈若冲.(2021-12-05)[2023-06-27].人民网评：中国的民主是广泛、真实、管用的民主[EB/OL].http://opinion.people.com.cn/gb/n1/2021/1205/c223228-32299931.html.
• 舒启明.(2021-12-31)[2023-06-27].发展全过程人民民主[EB/OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1720641016545975783&wfr=spider&for=pc.
• 王刚，张霞飞.2022.空间的嵌入与互构：环境邻避冲突生成的新解释框架——基于核电站选址争议的个案分析[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),37(4):104-117.Wang G,Zhang X F.2022.Embedding and Inter-construction of space:A new interpretation framework for environment-NIMBY conflict[J].Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition),37(4):104-117.(in Chinese)
• 王建军，昝冬平，陈思羽.2017.动态能力和社会关系对企业绩效的作用机制：有调节的中介效用检验[J].管理工程学报，31(1):39-49.Wang J J,Zan D P,Chen S Y.2017.The influence of dynamic capabilities and social ties on firm performance:An investigation of the moderated mediation effects[J].Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,31(1):39-49.(in Chinese)
• 王浦劬，季程远.2019.我国经济发展不平衡与社会稳定之间矛盾的化解机制分析——基于人民纵向获得感的诠释[J].政治学研究，(1):63-76.Wang P Q,Ji C Y.2019.Resolving mechanism of the contradiction between China's inequality and social stability:An explanation based on relative acquisition[J].CASS Journal of Political Science,(1):63-76.(in Chinese)
• 汪仕凯.2023.全过程人民民主的知识脉络与历史经纬[J].天津社会科学，(1):11-18.Wang S K.2023.The knowledge and history of the Whole-Process Democracy of People[J].Tianjin Social Sciences,(1):11-18.(in Chinese)
• 文宏，韩运运.2021.“不要建在我的辖区”:科层组织中的官员邻避冲突——一个比较性概念分析[J].行政论坛，28(1):47-52.Wen H,Han Y Y.2021.Not in my turf:Blame avoidance in a bureaucratic organization—A comparative conceptual analysis[J].Administrative Tribune,28(1):47-52.(in Chinese)
• 温忠麟，叶宝娟.2014.中介效应分析：方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展，22(5):731-745.Wen Z L,Ye B J.2014.Analyses of mediating effects:The development of methods and models[J].Advances in Psychological Science,22(5):731-745.(in Chinese)
• 习近平.2021-07-02(2).在庆祝中国共产党成立100周年大会上的讲话[N].人民日报.
• 谢晓非，徐联仓.1995.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理学动态，(2):17-22.Xie X F,Xu L C.1995.Overview and theoretical framework of risk cognition research[J].Advances in Psychological Science,(2):17-22.(in Chinese)
• 张爱荣，陈俊芳，匡仪，等.2018.环境和生态意识催生的社会许可问题：缘起与应对[J].心理科学进展，26(10):1711-1723.Zhang A R,Chen J F,Kuang Y,et al.2018.Socio-environmental impacts and social licence:A critical review and future directions[J].Advances in Psychological Science,26(10):1711-1723.(in Chinese)
• 张书维.2017.社会公平感、机构信任度与公共合作意向[J].心理学报，49(6):794-813.Zhang S W.2017.Social justice,institutional trust and public cooperation intention[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,49(6):794-813.(in Chinese)
• 张书维，许志国.2018.行为公共管理学视角下政府决策的互动机制——基于环境型项目的分析[J].中国行政管理，(12):59-65.Zhang S W,Xu Z G.2018.Interaction mechanism of public decision-making from the behavioral public administration perspective:An analysis based on environmental projects[J].Chinese Public Administration,(12):59-65.(in Chinese)
• 张书维，申翊人，周洁.2020.行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机制：“一提两抑”[J].心理学报，52(2):240-256.Zhang S W,Shen Y R,Zhou J.2020.Social license of public decision from the behavioral public administration perspective:Transparency effect and its moderation[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,52(2):240-256.(in Chinese)
• 张勇杰.2018.邻避冲突中环保NGO参与作用的效果及其限度——基于国内十个典型案例的考察[J].中国行政管理，(1):39-45.Zhang Y J.2018.Study on the role and limitation of ENGOs participating in NIMBY conflict governance-based on ten typical cases[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):39-45.(in Chinese)
• 赵家坤，杨雪冬.2022.民主的发展更新与全过程人民民主的时代意义[J].中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报，(4):68-78.Zhao J K,Yang X D.2022.The development and renewal of democracy and the contemporary significance of Whole-Process People's Democracy[J].Journal of Fujian Provincial Committee Party School of CPC(Fujian Academy of Governance),(4):68-78.(in Chinese)
• 郑依琳，李磊，马韶君.2023.行为公共管理视角下邻避冲突的政府信任失灵逻辑[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),43(6):1-14.Zheng Y L,Li L,Ma S J.2023.The logic of government trust failure in NIMBY conflict from the perspective of behavioral public management[J].Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences),43(6):1-14.(in Chinese)
• Corscadden K,Wile A,Yiridoe E.2012.Social license and consultation criteria for community wind projects[J].Renewable Energy,44:392-397.
• Grimmelikhuijsen S G,Meijer A J.2014.Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization:Evidence from an online experiment[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,24(1):137-157.
• Jorgensen D.2006.Hinterland history:The Ok Tedi mine and its cultural consequences in Telefolmin[J].The Contemporary Pacific,18(2):233-263.
• Kunreuther H,Easterling D.1990.Are risk-benefit tradeoffs possible in siting hazardous facilities?[J].The American Economic Review,80(2):252-256.
• Moffat K,Zhang A R.2014.The paths to social licence to operate:An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining[J].Resources Policy,39:61-70.
• Prno J.2013.An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry[J].Resources Policy,38(4):577-590.
• Wang Q S,Guan Z.2023.Can sunlight disperse mistrust?A meta-analysis of the effect of transparency on citizens' trust in government[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,33(3):453-467.
• Zhang A R,Moffat K,Lacey J,et al.2015.Understanding the social licence to operate of mining at the national scale:A comparative study of Australia,China and Chile[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,108:1063-1072.
• Zheng R,Rao L L,Zheng X L,et al.2015.The more involved in lead-zinc mining risk the less frightened:A psychological typhoon eye perspective[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,44:126-134.
• (1)4个测试版本分别为“高程序公平×高分配公平×高政府信任”“低程序公平×低分配公平×低政府信任”“高程序公平×高分配公平×高风险感知”“低程序公平×低分配公平×低风险感知”。
• (2)前一个为实验A的数值,后一个为实验B的数值,下同。
• (3)出现以下5种情况其中之一的样本视为无效样本:(1)问卷填写不完整,只要出现缺失值即清除整份问卷的数据;(2)问卷选项雷同,即所有问题的回答均选择相同选项即被清除数据;(3)问卷填答时间过短,根据Credamo平台记录的填答时长低于预调研对象的最短用时即被清除;(4)问卷未通过甄别题检验,问卷结尾设置了一道甄别题,以检验被试是否认真作答,凡是未通过甄别题项的样本将被系统自动拒绝回收;(5)凡是年龄低于15岁的被试样本不予接收。