唐啸,潘雨欣

• 1:清华大学公共管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

地方法院对裁判文书公开这一改革措施的响应程度为什么存在差异?既有研究多采用以概率论为基础的传统计量方法进行因果推断，本文采用定性比较分析法(qualitative comparative analysis, QCA),通过考察影响因素之间的关系和共同作用，对这一问题进行再辨析。研究发现，在外部环境驱动、组织与外部环境耦合、组织与内部制度耦合、制度压力下的创新工作这4种影响因素的组合形态下，地方法院对信息公开改革具有高响应水平。研究深化了对裁判文书公开影响机制的认识，也为未来信息公开实践提供启示。

关键词(KeyWords)： 信息公开;定性比较分析;影响机制

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重点项目“地方政府短视行为的机制分析与对策研究”(项目批准号:22AGL031)资助

作者(Author): 唐啸,潘雨欣

参考文献(References)：

• 程金华.2014.中国司法改革的利益相关者——理论、实证与政策分析[J].北大法律评论，15(2):450-489.Cheng J H.2014.Stakeholders of judicial reform in China:Theoretical,empirical,and policy analyses[J].Peking University Law Review,15(2):450-489.(in Chinese)
• 刁伟涛，任占尚.2019.公众参与能否促进地方债务信息的主动公开——一项准实验的实证研究[J].公共行政评论，12(5):93-114,213-214.Diao W T,Ren Z S.2019.Can initiative disclosure of local government debt be promoted by public participation?—An empirical study based on a quasi-Experiment[J].Journal of Public Administration,12(5):93-114,213-214.(in Chinese)
• 刘金东，薛一帆，管星华.2019.财政信息公开为何陷入“低水平陷阱”?——基于地方标杆竞争视角的研究[J].公共行政评论，12(5):75-92,213.Liu J D,Xue Y F,Guan X H.2019.Why does fiscal information disclosure fall into “low level trap”?—A perspective of benchmarking competition[J].Journal of Public Administration,12(5):75-92,213.(in Chinese)
• 卢显阳.2018.基于司法裁判文书数据的信息公开实践分析研究[J].档案管理，(6):62-64,86.Lu X Y.2018.Analysis and research on information disclosure practice based on judicial court decisions[J].Archives Management,(6):62-64,86.(in Chinese)
• 马超，于晓虹，何海波.2016.大数据分析：中国司法裁判文书上网公开报告[J].中国法律评论，(4):195-246.Ma C,Yu X H,He H B.2016.Big data analysis:A report on the online disclosure of judicial documents in China[J].China Law Review,(4):195-246.(in Chinese)
• 苏力.2010.审判管理与社会管理——法院如何有效回应“案多人少”?[J].中国法学，(6):176-189.Su L.2010.Judicial management and social management[J].China Legal Science,(6):176-189.(in Chinese)
• 苏力.2015.法治及其本土资源[M].3版.北京：北京大学出版社.Su L.2015.Rule of law and its local resources[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Peking University Press.(in Chinese)
• 唐应茂.2018a.司法公开及其决定因素：基于中国裁判文书网的数据分析[J].清华法学，12(4):35-47.Tang Y M.2018a.The decisive factor in promoting judicial openness:The data statistics of judicial judgments[J].Tsinghua University Law Journal,12(4):35-47.(in Chinese)
• 唐应茂.2018b.领导意愿、机构能力和司法公开——北京、上海、广东裁判文书上网率的初步研究[J].中国法律评论，(6):90-102.Tang Y M.2018b.Leader's will,institution's capacity and judicial openness:A preliminary study on online access of judgment documents in Beijing,Shanghai and Guangdong[J].China Law Review,(6):90-102.(in Chinese)
• 翁子明.2009.司法判决的生产方式：当代中国法官的制度激励与行为逻辑[M].北京：北京大学出版社.Weng Z M.2009. Production of judgment:The institutional incentive and action logic of judges in contemporary China[M].Beijing:Peking University Press.(in Chinese)
• 阎波，李泓波，吴佳顺，等.2013.政府信息公开的影响因素：中国省级政府的实证研究[J].当代经济科学，35(6):67-77,124-125.Yan B,Li H B,Wu J S,et al.2013.Determinants of government's information disclosure:Empirical research on Chinese provincial governments[J].Modern Economic Science,35(6):67-77,124-125.(in Chinese)
• 杨金晶，覃慧，何海波.2019.裁判文书上网公开的中国实践——进展、问题与完善[J].中国法律评论，(6):125-147.Yang J J,Qin H,He H B.2019.China's practice of disclosing judgment documents online:Progress,problems and improvements[J].China Law Review,(6):125-147.(in Chinese)
• 叶燕杰.2019.司法政策执行视阈下刑事裁判文书“部分上网”问题[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(2):68-77.Ye Y J.2019.Study on the “partial internet access” of criminal judicial documents from the perspective of judicial policy implementation[J].Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),(2):68-77.(in Chinese)
• 赵红星，李君剑.2015.裁判文书网上公开现状探析及公开方向论证[J].河北法学，33(12):190-200.Zhao H X,Li J J.2015.Analysis of current situation of court judgment online public and direction argument[J].Hebei Law Science,33(12):190-200.(in Chinese)
• 左卫民.2017.时间都去哪儿了——基层法院刑事法官工作时间实证研究[J].现代法学，39(5):174-183.Zuo W M.2017.Where does time go:An empirical study on the working time of criminal judges in grassroots courts[J].Modern Law Science,39(5):174-183.(in Chinese)
• 左卫民.2018.“诉讼爆炸”的中国应对：基于W区法院近三十年审判实践的实证分析[J].中国法学，(4):238-260.Zuo W M.2018.Response to litigation explosion in China:Based on empirical analysis of the trial practice of the court in W district in the past thirty years[J].China Legal Science,(4):238-260.(in Chinese)
• Bearfield D A,Bowman A O.2017.Can you find it on the web?An assessment of municipal e-government transparency[J].The American Review of Public Administration,47(2):172-188.
• Berliner D,Erlich A.2015.Competing for transparency:Political competition and institutional reform in Mexican states[J].American Political Science Review,109(1):110-128.
• Boukari M,Veiga F J.2018.Disentangling political and institutional determinants of budget forecast errors:A comparative approach[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,46(4):1030-1045.
• Chen L,Liu Z,Tang Y M.2022.Judicial transparency as judicial centralization:Mass publicity of court decisions in China[J].Journal of Contemporary China,31(137):726-739.
• Damanpour F.1991.Organizational innovation:A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators[J].Academy of Management Journal,34(3):555-590.
• Dreher A,Lamla M J,Lein S M,et al.2009.The impact of political leaders' profession and education on reforms[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,37(1):169-193.
• Gandía J L,Archidona M C.2008.Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils[J].Online Information Review,32(1):35-57.
• Grimmelikhuijsen S G,Welch E W.2012.Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments[J].Public Administration Review,72(4):562-571.
• Grimmelikhuijsen S G,Meijer A J.2014.Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization:Evidence from an online experiment[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,24(1):137-157.
• Grimmelikhuijsen S G,Feeney M K.2017.Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments[J].Public Administration Review,77(4):579-590.
• Hollyer J R,Rosendorff B P,Vreeland J R.2015.Transparency,protest,and autocratic instability[J].American Political Science Review,109(4):764-784.
• Kosack S,Fung A.2014.Does transparency improve governance?[J].Annual Review of Political Science,17:65-87.
• Liebman B L,Roberts M E,Stern R E,et al.2020.Mass digitization of Chinese court decisions:How to use text as data in the field of Chinese law[J].Journal of Law and Courts,8(2):177-201.
• Liu Z,Wong T J,Yi Y,et al.2022.Authoritarian transparency:China's missing cases in court disclosure[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,50(1):221-239.
• Ma L.2014.Diffusion and assimilation of government microblogging:Evidence from Chinese cities[J].Public Management Review,16(2):274-295.
• Moon M J,Norris D F.2005.Does managerial orientation matter?The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level[J].Information Systems Journal,15(1):43-60.
• Pina V,Torres L,Royo S.2007.Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments?An empirical study[J].Public Administration,85(2):449-472.
• Piotrowski S J,Zhang Y H,Lin W W,et al.2009.Key issues for implementation of Chinese open government information regulations[J].Public Administration Review,69(S1):S129-S135.
• Porumbescu G A,Lindeman M I H,Ceka E,et al.2017.Can transparency foster more understanding and compliant citizens?[J].Public Administration Review,77(6):840-850.
• Putnam R D.1977.Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies:An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy[J].Comparative Political Studies,10(3):383-412.
• Ragin C C.2008.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
• Schmidthuber L,Ingrams A,Hilgers D.2021.Government openness and public trust:The mediating role of democratic capacity[J].Public Administration Review,81(1):91-109.
• Tang Y M,Liu J Z.2019.Mass publicity of Chinese court decisions[J].The China Review,19(2):15-40.
• Tavares A F,da Cruz N F.2020.Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework[J].Government Information Quarterly,37(3):101249.
• Waldron T L,Navis C,Fisher G.2013.Explaining differences in firms' responses to activism[J].Academy of Management Review,38(3):397-417.
• Weaver G R,Trevi?o L K,Cochran P L.1999.Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance:Management commitments,external pressures,and corporate ethics practices[J].Academy of Management Journal,42(5):539-552.
• Welch E W,Wong W.2001.Global information technology pressure and government accountability:The mediating effect of domestic context on website openness[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,11(4):509-538.
• Yavuz N,Welch E W.2014.Factors affecting openness of local government websites:Examining the differences across planning,finance and police departments[J].Government Information Quarterly,31(4):574-583.
• (1)基于概率论的分析多用“因素”指代可能影响结果的潜在原因;而在集合论的语境中,多用“条件”指代导致结果产生的前因。本文下述对研究方法的反思与选用以及后文均用“条件”一词表述,以更贴合研究方法的话语与应用。
• (2)“各地对审判管理的重视程度不一。越是经济水平发达的地区,它们越有自己的想法去推行地方的改革政策。”(资料来源:最高法院相关人员访谈,2021年11月)
• (3)针对本研究关注的结果变量“响应程度”的说明:本文的研究对象为地方法院的响应程度,即地方法院在特定时间段内对最高法裁判文书公开改革的响应积极性,这通过地方法院的文书上传量在可上传文书总量中的比例体现。由于考虑到2016年裁判文书公开改革推行时地方法院尚有大量以往年份制作文书的存留,因此对2016年改革响应的程度测量包括两个部分:(1)当年的文书上传量作为实际上传文书量(分子);(2)两轮裁判文书公开改革区间内(2014—2016年)的法院结案量和2016年之前的文书上传量的差值(分母)。2016年的实际上传文书量与可上传文书量的比值就是对2016年裁判文书公开改革的响应程度的差异。本文数据来源为地方法院上报最高法的绩效考核数据及公开的结案数据。