付春野,徐伟,吕小康

• 1:南开大学社会学院

摘要(Abstract)：

从公众视角理解其对生育助推政策的态度，是确保相应政策得以恰当实施并取得理想效果的关键。本文以育龄期但未生育群体为研究对象，通过调查实验考察其对不同生育助推策略的态度差异。研究发现，当考虑政策对自身的影响时，参与者对强调健康收益的助推策略态度更积极；保持助推透明可降低公众对于健康收益助推策略的伦理风险感知，但对引导积极情感的助推策略无效；而考虑政策对社会的影响时，参与者对两种助推策略的态度无明显差异，保持助推策略透明改善了参与者对积极情感类助推策略的态度，但对强调健康收益类助推策略无效。该结果表明公众对生育助推策略的态度是多层次和多元化的。在设计生育助推策略时更适用基于理性的助推策略，并应保持助推意图透明，以缓解当下舆论空间的伦理质疑。

关键词(KeyWords)： 助推;双加工理论;生育政策;透明性;自主性

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金青年项目“医疗人工智能应用的社会许可研究”(项目批准号:24CSH088)的资助

作者(Author): 付春野,徐伟,吕小康

参考文献(References)：

• 陈晶莹，马建青.2022.三孩政策下青年低生育现象的成因及破解策略[J].中国青年研究，(3):31-36.Chen J Y,Ma J Q.2022.Causes of low fertility among young people under the three-child policy and strategies to break it down[J].China Youth Study,(3):31-36.(in Chinese)
• 陈梅，张梦皙，石智雷.2023.公共托幼服务对生育意愿的影响——基于断点回归的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),23(6):2280-2296.Chen M,Zhang M X,Shi Z L.2023.The influence of public childcare services on child's fertility intention-empirical evidence based on regression discontinuity[J].China Economic Quarterly,23(6):2280-2296.(in Chinese)
• 丹尼尔·卡尼曼.2012.思考，快与慢[M].胡晓姣，李爱民，何梦莹，译.北京：中信出版社.Kahneman D.2012.Thinking,fast and slow[M].Hu X J,Li A M,He M Y,trans.Beijing:China Citic Press.(translated into Chinese)
• 付春野，吕小康，张雅睿.2022.公共政策中助推策略的伦理争议[J].公共行政评论，15(3):179-195,200.Fu C Y,Lyu X K,Zhang Y R.2022.Ethical issues of nudging in public policy[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(3):179-195,200.(in Chinese)
• 胡赛全，刘展余，雷玉琼，等.2022.公众对助推型减碳政策的偏好研究：基于联合实验与机器学习方法[J].公共行政评论，15(3):40-61,197.Hu S Q,Liu Z Y,Lei Y Q,et al.2022.Public preference for nudge-based decarbonization policies:A conjoint experiment with machine learning approach[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(3):40-61,197.(in Chinese)
• 黄湛冰，刘磊.2020.轻推式干预未被中国广泛运用的原因：行为经济学分析[J].公共管理与政策评论，9(2):55-68.Huang Z B,Liu L.2020.Why nudge intervention is used rare in China?—An analysis of behavioral economics[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,9(2):55-68.(in Chinese)
• 蒋俏蕾，王鸿坤，陈宗海.2023.社交媒体信息获取对育龄女性生育意愿的影响——基于主动寻求信息和偶然接触信息的比较研究[J].中国人口科学，37(1):39-55.Jiang Q L,Wang H K,Chen Z H.2023.Social media information acquisition and its impacts on women's fertility intention:A comparison between information seeking and incidental exposure[J].Chinese Journal of Population Science,37(1):39-55.(in Chinese)
• 理查德·泰勒，卡斯·R.桑斯坦.2009.助推：如何作出有关健康、财富与幸福的最佳决策[M].刘宁，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社.Thaler R H,Sunstein C R.2009.Nudge:Improving decisions about health,wealth,and happiness[M].Liu N,trans.Beijing:China Renmin University Press.(translated into Chinese)
• 李婷，袁洁，夏璐，等.2019.中国网络大众生育态度倾向变迁——兼论舆情大数据在人口学中的应用[J].人口研究，43(4):36-49.Li T,Yuan J,Xia L,et al.2019.The transition of fertility intention propensity of Chinese web-users:The application of public opinion big data analysis[J].Population Research,43(4):36-49.(in Chinese)
• 李燕，陈文进，张书维.2023.基于元分析的助推效果研究：“认知路径”与“透明性”的二维视角[J].心理科学进展，31(12):2275-2294.Li Y,Chen W J,Zhang S W.2023.The behavioral effects of nudge:A meta-analysis based on a dual perspective of “Cognitive Pathway” and “Transparency”[J].Advances in Psychological Science,31(12):2275-2294.(in Chinese)
• 李志，吴永江.2022.育龄青年的生育价值观影响生育计划的调查研究—基于生育支持的中介作用分析[J].中国特色社会主义研究，(5/6):84-96.Li Z,Wu Y J.2022.Investigation of and study on impact of fertility value of youth of childbearing age on their planning for pregnancy:Based on the analysis on mediating role of bearing supports[J].Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics,(5/6):84-96.(in Chinese)
• 史毅，韩润霖.2023.送托一定会提高女性再生育意愿吗?——来自第七次全国生育状况抽样调查的发现[J].浙江社会科学，(11):71-81,101,157.Shi Y,Han R L.2023.Will subsidized childcare increase women's fertility intentions?Evidence from the seventh national survey on births and fertility[J].Zhejiang Social Sciences,(11):71-81,101,157.(in Chinese)
• 孙源，米加宁，刘鲁宁.2024.志愿服务中算法透明度对感知可信度的影响——服务动机的调节效应[J].公共行政评论，17(1):66-83,197.Sun Y,Mi J N,Liu L N.2024.The impact of algorithm transparency on perceived trustworthiness in voluntary service:The moderating effect of service motivation[J].Journal of Public Administration,17(1):66-83,197.(in Chinese)
• 王金营，张龙飞.2024.生育率回升的公共政策：约束、激励和扶持[J].人口与发展，30(1):2-12.Wang J Y,Zhang L F.2024.Public policies for fertility recovery:Constraints,incentives and support[J].Population and Development,30(1):2-12.(in Chinese)
• 王郁芳.2024.生育新政下工作母亲就业困境与支持体系构建[J].城市学刊，45(1):16-22.Wang Y F.2024.Employment dilemmas and support system construction for working mothers under the new childbirth policy[J].Journal of Urban Studies,45(1):16-22.(in Chinese)
• 邢远阁.2022.共同富裕：对“福利工具”的超越与中国方案[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),35(5):43-52.Xing Y G.2022.Common prosperity:Transcendence of “welfare tool” and China's solution[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition),35(5):43-52.(in Chinese)
• 杨洸，王越.2023.威胁与效能：社交媒体“生育恐惧”讨论的主题分析和影响因素研究[J].新闻记者，(11):83-94.Yang G,Wang Y.2023.Threats and efficacy:A thematic analysis of the social media “birth fear” debate and a study of the influencing factors[J].Shanghai Journalism Review,(11):83-94.(in Chinese)
• 张书维，谭小慧，梁歆佚，等.2021.“助推”生育政策：信息框架影响生育意愿的调查实验研究[J].公共管理与政策评论，10(1):42-54.Zhang S W,Tan X H,Liang X Y,et al.2021.Nudging fertility policy:Two survey experiments of the effect of information framework on fertility intention[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,10(1):42-54.(in Chinese)
• 张书维，胡鑫雅，王宇.2022.助推生育意愿的默认选项效应研究：以“二孩”为支点[J].公共行政评论，15(5):4-26,196.Zhang S W,Hu X Y,Wang Y.2022.The effect of the default option to nudge fertility intention:The two-child policy as fulcrum[J].Journal of Public Administration,15(5):4-26,196.(in Chinese)
• 赵继娣，何彦伟，汤哲群.2022.街头官僚优先处置何种任务?—一项基于离散选择实验的任务选择逻辑研究[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(4):69-84.Zhao J D,He Y W,Tang Z Q.2022.What tasks do the street-level bureaucrats prioritize?—A study on their task selection logic based on discrete choice experiments[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(4):69-84.(in Chinese)
• 赵宁，刘鑫，李纾，等.2022.默认选项设置的助推效果：来自元分析的证据[J].心理科学进展，30(6):1230-1241.Zhao N,Liu X,Li S,et al.2022.Nudging effect of default options:A meta-analysis[J].Advances in Psychological Science,30(6):1230-1241.(in Chinese)
• 中国数字时代.(2021-06-19)[2024-03-25].【网络民议】三胎宣传广告舆论翻车，网民称“支持男人自己生三胎”[EB/OL].https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/667278.html.China's Digital Times.(2021-06-19)[2024-03-25].[Webcast] Netizens say they “support men giving birth to three children on their own” as public opinion flips on three-child propaganda ads[EB/OL].https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/667278.html.(in Chinese)
• 钟晓龙，李慧慧，王自锋.2024.高就业密度是否会降低生育意愿——基于CGSS微观数据的实证研究[J].统计学报，5(1):61-70.Zhong X L,Li H H,Wang Z F.2024.Does high employment density reduce fertility intention—Empirical research based on the micro data from CGSS[J].Journal of Statistics,5(1):61-70.(in Chinese)
• 周扬，於嘉，谢宇.2023.择偶偏好中的性别差异和社会阶层异质性——基于选择实验法的探索[J].社会学研究，(6):107-130,228-229.Zou Y,Yu J,Xie Y.2023.Gender differences and social class heterogeneity in mate p An exploratory study based on the choice experiment approach[J].Sociological Studies,(6):107-130,228-229.(in Chinese)
• 朱健刚，刘艺非.2024.影响慈善捐赠的显著因素：收入水平与受教育程度的对比分析[J].吉林大学社会科学学报，64(2):186-204,240.Zhu J G,Liu Y F.2024.Significant Factors influencing charitable donations:A comparative study of education and income level[J].Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition,64(2):186-204,240.(in Chinese)
• 朱莉，黄柏林，刘呈军，等.2024.主观福利对生育意愿的影响——基于CGSS数据的实证研究[J].人口研究，48(1):118-132.Zhu L,Huang B L,Liu C J,et al.2024.The impact of subjective well-being on fertility intention:An empirical study based on CGSS data[J].Population Research,48(1):118-132.(in Chinese)
• Ashcroft R E.2013.Doing good by stealth:Comments on ‘Salvaging the Concept of Nudge'[J].Journal of Medical Ethics,39(8):494.
• Baldwin R.2014.From regulation to behaviour change:Giving nudge the third degree[J].The Modern Law Review,77(6):831-857.
• Banerjee S,John P.2024.Nudge plus:Incorporating reflection into behavioral public policy[J].Behavioural Public Policy,8(1):69-84.
• Brady W J,Wills J A,Jost J T,et al.2017.Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,114(28):7313-7318.
• Bruns H,Kantorowicz-Reznichenko E,Klement K,et al.2018.Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,65:41-59.
• Cucciniello M,Porumbescu G A,Grimmelikhuijsen S.2017.25 years of transparency research:Evidence and future directions[J].Public Administration Review,77(1):32-44.
• de Ridder D,Kroese F,van Gestel L.2022.Nudgeability:Mapping conditions of susceptibility to nudge influence[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,17(2):346-359.
• Dogruel L.2019.Privacy nudges as policy interventions:Comparing US and German media users' evaluation of information privacy nudges[J].Information,Communication & Society,22(8):1080-1095.
• Dolan P,Hallsworth M,Halpern D,et al.2012.Influencing behaviour:The mindspace way[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,33(1):264-277.
• Evans J S B T,Stanovich K E.2013.Dual-process theories of higher cognition:Advancing the debate[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,8(3):223-241.
• Grelle S,Hofmann W.2024.When and why do people accept public-policy interventions?An integrative public-policy-acceptance framework[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,19(1):258-279.
• Hagman W,Andersson D,V?stfj?ll D,et al.2015.Public views on policies involving nudges[J].Review of Philosophy and Psychology,6(3):439-453.
• Hansen P G,Jespersen A M.2013.Nudge and the manipulation of choice:A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy[J].European Journal of Risk Regulation,4(1):3-28.
• Hansen P G.2016.The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism:Does the hand fit the glove?[J].European Journal of Risk Regulation[J],7(1):155-174.
• Isler O,Rojas A,Dulleck U.2022.Easy to shove,difficult to show:Effect of educative and default nudges on financial self-management[J].Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance,34:100639.
• John P,Stoker G.2019.Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy[J].Policy & Politics,47(2):209-225.
• Jung J Y,Mellers B A.2016.American attitudes toward nudges[J].Judgment and Decision Making,11(1):62-74.
• Li Z Y.2020.Role of affective mediators in the effects of media use on proenvironmental behavior[J].Science Communication,43(1):64-90.
• Lin Y L,Osman M,Ashcroft R.2017.Nudge:Concept,effectiveness,and ethics[J].Basic and Applied Social Psychology,39(6):293-306.
• Loewenstein G,Sunstein C R,Golman R.2014.Disclosure:Psychology changes everything[J].Annual Review of Economics,6(1):391-419.
• Mettler T,Stepanovic S.2024.Acceptable nudge strategies to incentivize the use of wearables and physiolytics at work:A Q-methodology examination[J].Journal of Information Technology,39(2):361-387.
• Michels L,Ochmann J,Schmitt K,et al.2024.Salience,transparency,and self-nudging:A digital nudge to promote healthier food product choices[J].European Journal of Information Systems,33(5):717-747.
• Mu R,Li Y,Cui T.2022.Policy narrative,policy understanding and policy support intention:A survey experiment on energy conservation[J].Policy Studies,43(6):1361-1381.
• Osman M.2013.A case study:Dual-process theories of higher cognition—commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013)[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,8(3):248-252.
• Porumbescu G.2017.Linking transparency to trust in government and voice[J].The American Review of Public Administration,47(5):520-537.
• Qinyu E.2015.Creating demand for abortion service:A content analysis of Chinese television abortion advertisements[D].Kent:Kent State University.
• Roozenbeek J,van der Linden S,Goldberg B,et al.2022.Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media[J].Science Advances,8(34):eabo6254.
• Schmidt A T.2017.The power to nudge[J].American Political Science Review,111(2):404-417.
• Slovic P,Finucane M L,Peters E,et al.2004.Risk as analysis and risk as feelings:Some thoughts about affect,reason,risk,and rationality[J].Risk Analysis,24(2):311-322.
• Tannenbaum M B,Hepler J,Zimmerman R S,et al.2015.Appealing to fear:A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories[J].Psychological Bulletin,141(6):1178-1204.
• van Rookhuijzen M,de Vet E,Adriaanse M A.2023.The effect of transparency on the temporal spillover effect of default nudges[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,62(3):1363-1375.
• Vlaev I,King D,Dolan P,et al.2016.The theory and practice of “nudging”:Changing health behaviors[J].Public Administration Review,76(4):550-561.
• Xiao X D,Chang B R,Lian R.2023.Does China's residential mobility reduce fertility intentions?The mediating role of well-being[J].Acta Psychologica,241:104082.
• Yan H Y,Yates J F.2019.Improving acceptability of nudges:Learning from attitudes towards opt-in and opt-out policies[J].Judgment and Decision Making,14(1):26-39.