张楠,孟庆国,郭迅华

• 1:清华大学公共管理学院
• 2:清华大学经济管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

随着信息通信技术的飞速发展及其为人类社会活动和行为方式带来的深刻变革,电子政务成为过去10年间公共管理领域趋之若鹜的热门话题之一。但是,由于学科基础庞杂、研究角度多样,长期以来电子政务研究的核心内涵与边界外延并不清晰。本文基于对1999—2009年SSCI检索的356篇电子政务研究文献的分析,从研究对象、研究方法、研究焦点及主流理论等维度讨论了世界范围内电子政务研究的现状和趋势。本文作为一篇研究综述,希望通过系统回顾过去10年国际电子政务研究的主要进展,帮助相关领域学者理解和把握研究的未来发展方向。

关键词(KeyWords)： 电子政务;文献分析;社会科学引文索引(SSCI)

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(70833002/70890080/70970029);; 国家社会科学基金(05BZZ032);; 中国博士后科学基金(20080440030)资助

作者(Author): 张楠,孟庆国,郭迅华

参考文献(References)：

• [2]陈国青,等.前言.信息系统学报,2007,(1):V.
• [1]Checkland,P.,and Holwell,S.Information,Systems and Information Systems:Making Sense of the Field,John Wiley & Sons,Chichester,UK,1998.
• [2]Hackney R,Kim S,Wastell D.Editorial.Information Systems Journal,2005,15(1):1-3.
• [3]Moon.M.J.The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities:Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review,2002,62(4):424-433.
• [4]在SSCI数据库中可检索到最早的电子政务研究文献:Hwang S D,Choi Y P,Myeong S H.Electronic Government in South Korea:Conceptual Problem.Government Information Quarterly,1999,16(3):277-285.
• [5]Grant G.Realizing the Promise of Electronic Government.Journal of Global Information Management, 2005,13(1):i-iv.
• [6]Irani Z,Love P E D,Montazemi A.E-Government:Past,Present and Future.European Journal of Information Systems,2007,16(2):103-105.
• [7]王长胜,徐小平.中国电子政务发展报告(2009),北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
• [8]United Nations.UN E-Government Survey 2008:From E-Government to Connected Governance.(2007- 12-01) www.unpan.org.
• [1]Vessey I,Ramesh R,Glass R L.Research in Information Systems:An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals.Journal of Management Information Systems,2002,19(2):129-174.
• [2]Yildiz M.E-government research:Reviewing the literature,limitations,and ways forward.Government Information Quarterly,2007,24(3):646-665.
• [3]徐勇,张昆丽,张秀华.SSCI源期刊的分析.浙江图书情报工作,2007,(3):35-37.
• [4]检索截止时间为2009年12月1日。
• [1]Layne K,Lee J W.Developing Fully Functional E-Government:A Four Stage Mode.Government Information Quarterly,2001,18(2):122-136.
• [2]Andersen K V,Henriksen H Z.E-government maturity models:Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly,2006,23(2):236-248.
• [3]Siau K,Long Y A.Using social development lenses to understand e-government development.Journal of Global Information Management,2006,14(1):47-62.
• [1]Alavi M,Carlson P.A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development.Journal of Management Information Systems,1992,8(4):45-62.
• [2]Ji S,Min Q,Han W.Information Systems Research in China:An Empirical Study.Journal of Global Information Management,2007,15(1):1-17.
• [3]Babbie E.The Practice of Social Research.11 ed.New York:Wadsworth Publishing,2007.
• [1]Yin R K.Case Study Research:Design and Method.3 ed.Sage Publications,2003.
• [1]王长胜,徐小平.中国电子政务发展报告(2009),北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
• [2]Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences:Comparing Values,Behaviors,Institutions,and Organizations across Nations.2 ed.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,2001.
• [1]Vessey I,Ramesh R,Glass R L.Research in Information Systems:An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals.Journal of Management Information Systems,2002,19(2):129-174.
• [2]Babbie E.The Practice of Social Research.11 ed.New York:Wadsworth Publishing,2007.
• [3]Fowler F J.Survey Research Method.3 ed.Sage Publications,2002.
• [4]Yin R K.Case Study Research:Design and Method.3 ed.Sage Publications,2003.
• [1]Davis F D,Bagozzi R P,Warshaw P R.User Acceptance of Computer Technology:A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.Management Science,1989,35(8):982-1002.
• [2]Taylor S,Todd P A.Understanding Information Technology Usage:A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research,1995,6(2):144-176.
• [3]Rogers E M.Diffusion of Innovations.5 ed.New York:The Free Press,2003.
• [4]张楠,郭迅华,陈国青.行为建模角度的信息技术采纳研究综述.科学管理研究,2009,27(4):13-19.
• [5]Huang W,Ambra J D,Bhalla V.An Empirical Investigation of the Adoption of eGovernment in Australian Citizens:Some Unexpected Research Findings.Journal of Computer Information Systems,43(1):15-22.
• [1]Norris D F,Moon S J.Advancing e-Government at the Grassroots:Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review,2005,65(1):64-75.
• [2]Lee J.Determinants of Government Bureaucrats' New PMIS Adoption:The Role of Organizational Power,IT Capability,Administrative Role,and Attitude,American Review of Public Administration,2008,38(2): 180-202.
• [3]Zhang N,Guo X,Chen G,Chau,P Y K.Impact of Perceived Fit on E-Government User Evaluation:A Study with a Chinese Cultural Context.Journal of Global Information Management,2009,17(1):49-69.
• [4]Benbasat I,Barki H.Quo Vadis,TAM? Journal of AIS,2007,8(4):211-218.
• [5]Gupta M P,Jana D.E-Government Evaluation:A Framework and Case Study.Government Information Quarterly,2003,20(4):365-387.
• [6]DeLone W H,McLean E R.The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success:A Ten Year Update.Journal of Management Information Systems,2003,19(4):9-30.
• [7]Zhang X,Ryan S D.Evaluating Leadership,IT Quality,and Net Benefits in an e-Government Environment.Information & Management,2008,45(3):101-120.
• [8]Wang Y,Liao Y.Assessing eGovernment Systems Success:A Validation of the DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success.Governmens Information Quarterly,2008,25(4):711-733.
• [9]Zhang N,Guo X,Chen G,et al.Impact of Perceived Fit on E-Government User Evaluation:A Study with a Chinese Cultural Context.Journal of Global Infor mation Management,2009,17(1):49-69.
• [1]Weare C,Musso J,Hare M L.Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California.Administrative Science,1999,31(1):3-27.
• [2]Thomas J C,Streib G.E-Democracy,e-Commerce and e-Research:Examining Electronic Ties between Citizens and Governments.Administrative Science,2005,37(3):259-280.
• [3]Kampen J K,Snijkers K.E-Democracy:A Critical Evaluation of the Ultimate e-Dream.Social Science Computer Review,2003,21(4):491-496.
• [4]West D M.E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes.Public Administration Review,2004,64(1):15-27.
• [5]Parent M,Vandebeek C A,Gemino A C.Building Citizen Trust through e-Government.Government Information Quarterly,2005,22(4):720-736.
• [6]McFalan F W.全球信息经济中的治理.信息系统学报,2007,1(1):8-15.
• [7]Allen B A,Juillet L,Paquet G,et al.E-Governance & Government On-Line in Canada:Partnerships, People & Prospects.Government Information Quarterly,2001,18(2):93-104.
• [8]Bekkers V.The Governance of Back-Office Integration:Organizing Co-Operation between Information Domains.Public Management Review,2007,9(3):377-400.
• [1]Dawes S S.Governance in the Digital Age:A Research and Action Framework for an Uncertain Future. Government Information Quarterly,2009,26(2):257-264.
• [2]Helbig N,Gil-Garcia J R,Ferro E.Understanding the Complexity of Electronic Government:Implications from the Digital Divide Literature.Government Information Quarterly,2009,26(1):89-97.
• [3]Fagan J C,Fagan B.An Accessibility Study of State Legislative Web Sites.Government Information Quarterly,2004,21(1):65-85.
• [4]Jaeger P T.Beyond Section 508:The Spectrum of Legal Requirements for Accessible e-Government Web Sites in the United States.Journal of Government Information,2004,30(4):518-533.
• [5]W3C.Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0(On-line).Available:(2000-11-06) http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-TECHS/.
• [6]Becker S A.E-Government Visual Accessibility for Older Adult Users.Social Science Computer Review, 2004,22(1):11-23.
• [7]Yao Y,Okoli C,Houston A,et al.Demographic Differences in Attitudes toward Remote Electronic Voting Systems.Journal of Computer Information Systems,2006,47(2):34-45.
• [1]深圳信息无障碍研究会网站(www.21c888.com)。
• [2]Layne,K,Lee J W.Developing Fully Functional E-Government:A Four Stage Mode.Government Information Quarterly,2001,18(2):122-136.
• [3]Government CIO.The HKSARG Interoperability Framework,Office of the Government Chief Information Officer.The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,www.ogcio.gov.hk. (2007-02-28)
• [4]CIOC,Federal Chief Information Officer Council.Federal enterprise architecture framework,version 1.1. (1999-09-01)
• [5]CIOC,Federal Chief Information Officer Council.E-Gov enterprise architecture guidance,draft-version 2.0. (2002-03-12)
• [6]Guijaro L.Interoperability Frameworks and Enterprise Architectures in e-Government Initiatives in Europe and the United States.Government Information Quarterly,2007,24(1):89-101.
• [7]Phang C W,Kankanhalli U,Ang C.Investigating Organizational Learning in eGovernment Projects:A Multi-Theoretic Approach.Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2008,17(2):99-123.
• [8]Gottschalk P.Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government.Government Information Quarterly,2009,26(1):75-81.
• [1]Layne K,Lee J.W.Developing Fully Functional E-Government:A Four Stage Mode.Government Information Quarterly,2001,18(2):122-136.
• [2]Grant G,Chau D.Developing a Generic Framework for e-Government.Journal of Global Information Management,2005,13(1):1 30.
• [3]Lapsley I.New Public Management:The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? ABCUS,2009,45(1):1-21.
• [4]Torres L,Pina V,Royo S.E-Government and the Transformation of Public Administrations in EU Countries:Beyond NPM or Just a Second Wave of Reforms? Online Information Review,2005,29(5):531-553.
• [5]Irani Z,Elliman T,Jackson P.Electronic Transformation of Government in the U.K.:A Research Agenda.European Journal of Information Systems.2007,16(4):327-335.