柔性治理的隐蔽剥夺:基于城管“打破默契”现象的观察Covert Deprivation through Flexible Governance: An Observation Based on the Phenomenon of Urban Management Officers “Breaking the Unspoken Agreement”
魏航,张聪丛
摘要(Abstract):
近年来,柔性治理因能通过情感、道德、习俗等非正式制度资源化解基层矛盾冲突,已成为学界广泛认可的基层治理优化路径,但其潜在的剥夺性却鲜少受到关注。本研究以城管主动打破与摊贩的默契为案例,揭示城管通过刻意打破默契,制造摊贩对未来的不确定感,促使其自我约束和自我治理。研究表明,治理主体通过调节预期与现实轨迹间的落差,将物理管控转化为心理调控,形成隐蔽的权力运作逻辑,从而挑战了柔性治理研究的浪漫化叙事。
关键词(KeyWords): 柔性治理;街头官僚;基层治理;默契互动
基金项目(Foundation): 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“情动治理赋能基层群众性精神文明创建的作用机制研究”(项目批准号:2025CKS050)的资助
作者(Author): 魏航,张聪丛
参考文献(References):
- 陈柏峰.2013.城管执法冲突的社会情境---以《城管来了》为文本展开[J].法学家,(6):15-32,174.Chen B F.2013.Social context of the urban manager's law enforcement[J].Jurists Review,(6):15-32,174.(in Chinese) 陈那波,卢施羽.2013.场域转换中的默契互动---中国“城管”的自由裁量行为及其逻辑[J].管理世界,(10):62-80.Chen N B,Lu S Y.2013.Tacit interaction in field transition:The discretionary behavior and logic of China's urban management officers[J].Journal of Management World,(10):62-80.(in Chinese) 甘甜,王盈盈.2025.情景剧式说服:基层执法的策略组合与生效逻辑[J].公共管理与政策评论,14(1):88-107.Gan T,Wang Y Y.2025.Melodramatic persuasion:The combination and its effectiveness of street-level bureaucrats law enforcement strategies[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,14(1):88-107.(in Chinese) 韩志明,张朝霞.2018.合作的社会建构及其演进逻辑---城管与摊贩关系的再反思[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),18(4):136-146.Han Z M,Zhang Z X.2018.The social construction of cooperation and its evolutionary logic-Re-reflection on the relationship between Chengguan and vendors[J].Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition),18(4):136-146.(in Chinese) 韩志明,张朝霞.2020.合作是如何建构起来的?---以城管执法为中心的技术分析[J].公共管理与政策评论,(5):19-31.Han Z M,Zhang Z X.2020.How is cooperation structured?-Technical analysis centered on urban management law enforcement[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,(5):19-31.(in Chinese) 郝宇青.2024.以柔性治理促进社区善治[J].国家治理,(8):67-72.Hao Y Q.2024.Promoting good community governance through flexible governance[J].National Governance,(8):67-72.(in Chinese) 郝邹琴,陈雨露,李亚.2023.城市社区柔性治理的内涵、发生与实现路径[J].领导科学论坛,(11):127-130.Hao Z Q,Chen Y L,Li Y.2023.The connotation,occurrence and realization path of flexible governance in urban communities[J].The Forum of Leadership Science,(11):127-130.(in Chinese) 胡卫卫,于水.2019.策略行动、草根失语与乡村柔性治理[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(1):86-93,127.Hu W W,YU S.2019.Tactical action,grassroots aphasia and grassroots flexible governance[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(1):86-93,127.(in Chinese) 胡洁人,蔡舒依.2025.柔性治理:群团组织如何调处矛盾纠纷?---以浙江“桐家姑嫂”为例[J].中共天津市委党校学报,27(3):86-95.Hu J R,Cai S Y.2025.Flexible governance:How mass organizations mediate disputes?-A case study of“Tongjia Gusao”in Zhejiang[J].Journal of the Party School of Tianjin Committee of the C.P.C,27(3):86-95.(in Chinese) 李春生,韩志明.2024.默契性互动与基层有效治理---基于A路流动摊贩治理的观察[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(6):38-47,125-126.Li C S,Han Z M.2024.Tacit interaction and effective grassroots governance:Observations from the regulation of mobile vendors on Road A[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(6):38-47,125-126.(in Chinese) 刘升.2016.从冲突到合谋:城管与摊贩的交往逻辑[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),16(3):1-7.Liu S.2016.From the conflict to conspiracy:Chengguan and vendors contact logic:Acase study in Hanzhengjie governance[J].Journal of Beijing University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),16(3):1-7.(in Chinese) 刘升.2018.街头行政执法中的“平衡”机制研究---以城管执法为例[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(2):63-77.Liu S.2018.“Balance Doctrine”:The current phenomenon and logic by grassroots law enforcement-A case study of Chengguan to enforce the law[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(2):63-77.(in Chinese) 刘祖云,孔德斌.2013.乡村软治理:一个新的学术命题[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),52(3):9-18.Liu Z Y,Kong D B.2013.Rural soft governance:A new academic proposition[J].Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences),52(3):9-18.(in Chinese) 罗祎楠.2020.“当国家遇上马路”:基层官僚如何思考[J].读书,(7):24-32.Luo Y N.2020.“When the state meets the street”:How street-level bureaucrats think?[J].Reading,(7):24-32.(in Chinese) 吕德文.2022.治理周期与政策执行波动:基于城管执法的动态经验观察[J].公共行政评论,(6):136-153,199.Lyu D W.2022.Governance cycle and policy implementation fluctuations:Based on the dynamic experience observation of urban management law enforcement[J].Journal of Public Administration,(6):136-153,199.(in Chinese) 孙斐,王刘娟.2021.街头官僚的道德困境:一个文献综述[J].公共管理与政策评论,(3):158-168.Sun F,Wang L J.2021.The moral dilemmas of street-level bureaucrats:A literature review[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,(3):158-168.(in Chinese) 谭英俊.2014.柔性治理:21世纪政府治道变革的逻辑选择与发展趋向[J].理论探讨,(3):150-153.Tan Y J.2014.Flexible governance:The logical choice and development trend of government governance reform in the 21st century[J].Theoretical Investigation,(3):150-153.(in Chinese) 唐晓霞.2021.合作关系的建构:城管执法中城管与小贩关系研究[J].行政科学论坛,8(9):32-37.Tang X X.2021.Construction of cooperative relationships:A study on the relationship between urban management officers and vendors in law enforcement[J].Research of Administration Science,8(9):32-37.(in Chinese) 武小龙.2021.柔性治理的发生逻辑及影响效应---以拆迁纠纷事件中政府的回应策略为例[J].社会发展研究,8(2):89-105,243-244.Wu X L.2021.The logic and influence effect of flexible governance:From the perspective of government response in demolition disputes[J].Journal of Social Development,8(2):89-105,243-244.(in Chinese) 吴越菲.2025.通往“未来”的社会学:认识延展与核心议题[J].社会学研究,(1):137-158,229.Wu Y F.2025.Sociology to the“Future”:Cognitive extension and key issues[J].Sociological Studies,(1):137-158,229.(in Chinese) 延斯·贝克特.2023.想象的未来:虚构预期与资本主义动态发展[M].黄勤,译.武汉:华中科技大学出版社.Beckert J.2023.Imagined Futures:Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics[M].Huang Q,trans.Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.(trans.into Chinese) 叶敏,王佳璐.2019.赶超国家、发展政治与排斥型摊贩治理---以S市的摊贩监管政策实践为例[J].甘肃行政学院学报,(5):35-49,126.Ye M,Wang J L.2019.Catching up state,development coalition and exclusionary governance to street vending economy in Shanghai[J].Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,(5):35-49,126.(in Chinese) 岳书光.2017.城管执法冲突何以形成---基于嵌入式执法的分析[J].中国行政管理,(5):32-38.Yue S G.2017.How do urban management law enforcement conflicts arise?-An analysis based on embedded enforcement[J].Chinese Public Administration,(5):32-38.(in Chinese) 张跃,王俊秀,谭旭运.2024.未来可期:社会预期的功能及其影响机制[J].江苏行政学院学报,(6):65-75.Zhang Y,Wang J X,Tan X Y.2024.Aspiration for the future:Function of social expectation and its influencing mechanism[J].The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute,(6):65-75.(in Chinese) 张志华,王毅杰,武艳华.2024.“以人民为中心”的数字乡村柔性治理:发生逻辑与实践机制---基于“常州第一村”的拓展个案研究[J].电子政务,(11):113-124.Zhang Z H,Wang Y J,Wu Y H.2024.People-centered digital rural flexible governance:Occurrence logic and practice mechanism-An extended case study based on“Changzhou's Premier Village”[J].E-Government,(11):113-124.(in Chinese) 赵静,杨宜音.2017.城管的身份认同威胁及其身份协商策略[J].学术研究,(4):63-68.Zhao J,Yang Y Y.2017.Identity threat and negotiation strategies of urban management officers[J].Academic Research,(4):63-68.(in Chinese) Kaufman J.2020.Intensity,moderation,and the pressures of expectation:Calculation and coercion in the street-level practice of welfare conditionality[J].Social Policy&Administration,54(2):205-218. Maynard-Moody S W,Musheno M C.2003.Cops,teachers,counselors:Stories from the front lines of public service[M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press. Oberfield Z W.2014.Becoming bureaucrats:Socialization at the front lines of government service[M].Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press. Zacka B.2017.When the state meets the street:Public service and moral agency[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
- (1)访谈资料格式说明:IN代表“摊贩”,GC代表“城管”,访谈时间为2021年8月13日。