梁正,王尚瑞

• 1:清华大学公共管理学院
• 2:清华大学人工智能国际治理研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

AI已成为公共治理中的重要理论和实践热点,但国内学术界的研究以规范分析为主,这限制了理论检验与循证决策。本文采取系统性文献综述的方式,从Web of Science核心数据库中筛选了153篇英文实证文献,介绍了“AI作为治理对象”和“AI作为治理工具”两条研究进路。前者包括国家战略和治理设计两个研究主题,后者包括技术采纳、组织应用和社会意义3个研究主题,以及相应主题下的多个议题。通过引介相关的研究动态,本文旨在为实证研究设计提供选题、理论和方法上的思路,并为进一步探索前沿提供知识地图。

关键词(KeyWords)： AI;公共治理;实证研究;系统性文献综述;国际发表

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 科技创新2030新一代人工智能重大项目“重点领域人工智能治理挑战及对策研究”(项目批准号:2020AAA0105300)资助

作者(Author): 梁正,王尚瑞

参考文献(References)：

• 姜李丹,薛澜.2022.我国新一代人工智能治理的时代挑战与范式变革[J].公共管理学报,19(2):1-11.Jiang L D,Xue L.2022.The current challenges and paradigm transformation of newgeneration AI governance in China[J].Journal of Public Management,19(2):1-11.(in Chinese)
• 郑永年,杨丽君.2021.如何叙述中国的“另一种制度选择”[J].青年探索,(4):5-14.Zheng Y N,Yang L J.2021.How to describe China's“alternative institutional choice”[J].Youth Exploration,(4):5-14.(in Chinese)
• Af Malmborg F,Trondal J.2023.Discursive framing and organizational venues:Mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption[J].International Review of Administrative Sciences,89(1):39-58.
• Ahn M J,Chen Y C.2022.Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration:The perception of government employees and the willingness to Use AI in government[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(2):101664.
• Akkaya C,Krcmar H.2019.Potential use of digital assistants by governments for citizen services:The case of Germany[C]//Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.Dubai United Arab Emirates:ACM,81-90.
• Alon-Barkat S,Busuioc M.2023.Human-AI interactions in public sector decision making:“Automation bias”and“selective adherence”to algorithmic advice[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,33(1):153-169.
• Alshallaqi M.2022.The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion:A sociomateriality perspective[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2042726.
• Aoki N.2020.An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector[J].Government Information Quarterly,37(4):101490.
• Bareis J,Katzenbach C.2022.Talking AI into being:The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics[J].Science,Technology,&Human Values,47(5):855-881.
• Behl A,Chavan M,Jain K,et al.2022.The role of organizational culture and voluntariness in the adoption of artificial intelligence for disaster relief operations[J].International Journal of Manpower,43(2):569-586.
• Cath C,Wachter S,Mittelstadt B,et al.2018.Artificial Intelligence and the“Good Society”:The US,EU,and UK approach[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,24(2):505-528.
• Chen T,Ran L Y,Gao X.2019.AI innovation for advancing public service:The case of China's first administrative approval bureau[C]//Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.Dubai United Arab Emirates:ACM,100-108.
• Chen T,Guo W S,Gao X,et al.2021.AI-based self-service technology in public service delivery:User experience and influencing factors[J].Government Information Quarterly,38(4):101520.
• Criado J I,de Zarate-Alcarazo L O.2022.Technological frames,CIOs,and Artificial Intelligence in public administration:A socio-cognitive exploratory study in Spanish local governments[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(3):101688.
• Dauvergne P.2022.Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains?Exposing the political economy of environmental costs[J].Review of International Political Economy,29(3):696-718.
• de Bruijn H,Warnier M,Janssen M.2022.The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI:Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(2):101666.
• de Sousa W G,Fidelis R A,de Souza Bermejo P H,et al.2022.Artificial intelligence and speedy trial in the judiciary:Myth,reality or need?A case study in the Brazilian Supreme Courts (STF)[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(1):101660.
• Desiere S,Struyven L.2021.Using artificial intelligence to classify jobseekers:The accuracyequity trade-off[J].Journal of Social Policy,50(2):367-385.
• Djeffal C,Siewert M B,Wurster S.2022.Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence:A comparative analysis of AI strategies[J].Journal of European Public Policy,29(11):1799-1821.
• Ehret S.2022.Public preferences for governing AI technology:Comparative evidence[J].Journal of European Public Policy,29(11):1779-1798.
• Eyert F,Irgmaier F,Ulbricht L.2022.Extending the framework of algorithmic regulation.The Uber case[J].Regulation&Governance,16(1):23-44.
• Fatima S,Desouza K C,Dawson G S.2020.National strategic artificial intelligence plans:Amulti-dimensional analysis[J].Economic Analysis and Policy,67:178-194.
• Fatima S,Desouza K C,Denford J S,et al.2021.What explains governments interest in artificial intelligence?A signaling theory approach[J].Economic Analysis and Policy,71:238-254.
• Filgueiras F.2022.The politics of AI:Democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries[J].Journal of Information Technology&Politics,19(4):449-464.
• Franzke A S,Muis I,Sch?fer M T.2021.Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA):A dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands[J].Ethics and Information Technology,23(3):551-567.
• Galanos V.2019.Exploring expanding expertise:Artificial intelligence as an existential threat and the role of prestigious commentators,2014-2018[J].Technology Analysis&Strategic Management,31(4):421-432.
• Gesk T S,Leyer M.2022.Artificial intelligence in public services:When and why citizens accept its usage[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(3):101704.
• Giest S N,Klievink B.2022.More than a digital system:How AI is changing the role of bureaucrats in different organizational contexts[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2095001.
• Gorwa R,Binns R,Katzenbach C.2020.Algorithmic content moderation:Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance[J].Big Data&Society,7(1),doi:10.1177/2053951719897945.
• Grimmelikhuijsen S.2023.Explaining why the computer says no:Algorithmic transparency affects the perceived trustworthiness of automated decision-making[J].Public Administration Review,83(2):241-262.
• Hammer A,Karmakar S.2021.Automation,AI and the future of work in India[J].Employee Relations,43(6):1327-1341.
• Han T A,Lenaerts T,Santos F C,et al.2022.Voluntary safety commitments provide an escape from over-regulation in AI development[J].Technology in Society,68:101843.
• Hartmann K,Wenzelburger G.2021.Uncertainty,risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions:A case study on criminal justice in the USA[J].Policy Sciences,54(2):269-287.
• Hong S H,Lee J,Jang S,et al.2022.Making regulation flexible for the governance of disruptive innovation:A comparative study of AVs regulation in the United Kingdom and South Korea[J].Journal of European Public Policy,29(11):1845-1865.
• Hong S J,Cho H.2023.Privacy management and health information sharing via contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic:A hypothetical study on AI-based technologies[J].Health Communication,38(5):913-924.
• Ingrams A,Kaufmann W,Jacobs D.2022.In AI we trust?Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making[J].Policy&Internet,14(2):390-409.
• James A,Whelan A.2022.“Ethical”artificial intelligence in the welfare state:Discourse and discrepancy in Australian social services[J].Critical Social Policy,42(1):22-42.
• Janssen M,Hartog M,Matheus R,et al.2022.Will algorithms blind people?The effect of explainable AI and decision-makers'experience on AI-supported decision-making in government[J].Social Science Computer Review,40(2):478-493.
• Jia K,Zhang N.2022.Categorization and eccentricity of AI risks:A comparative study of the global AI guidelines[J].Electronic Markets,32(1):59-71.
• J?rgensen R F.2023.Data and rights in the digital welfare state:The case of Denmark[J].Information,Communication&Society,26(1):123-138.
• Justo-Hanani R.2022.The politics of artificial intelligence regulation and governance reform in the European union[J].Policy Sciences,55(1):137-159.
• Kankanamge N,Yigitcanlar T,Goonetilleke A.2021.Public perceptions on artificial intelligence driven disaster management:Evidence from Sydney,Melbourne and Brisbane[J].Telematics and Informatics,65:101729.
• Kerr A,Barry M,Kelleher J D.2020.Expectations of artificial intelligence and the performativity of ethics:Implications for communication governance[J].Big Data&Society,7(1),doi:10.1177/2053951720915939.
• Kumar S,Raut R D,Queiroz M M,et al.2021.Mapping the barriers of AI implementations in the public distribution system:The Indian experience[J].Technology in Society,67:101737.
• Kuziemski M,Misuraca G.2020.AI governance in the public sector:Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings[J].Telecommunications Policy,44(6):101976.
• Lloyd C,Payne J.2019.Rethinking country effects:Robotics,AI and work futures in Norway and the UK[J].New Technology,Work and Employment,34(3):208-225.
• Maragno G,Tangi L,Gastaldi L,et al.2022.AI as an organizational agent to nurture:Effectively introducing chatbots in public entities[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2063935.
• Mikalef P,Fj?rtoft S O,Torvatn H Y.2019.Artificial intelligence in the public sector:Astudy of challenges and opportunities for Norwegian municipalities[C]//Proceedings of the18th Conference on e-Business,e-Services and e-Society.Trondheim:Springer,267-277.
• Mikalef P,Lemmer K,Schaefer C,et al.2022.Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies:A study of determinants for European municipalities[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(4):101596.
• Minkkinen M,Zimmer M P,M?ntym?ki M.2023.Co-shaping an ecosystem for responsible AI:Five types of expectation work in response to a technological frame[J].Information Systems Frontiers,25(1):103-121.
• Munnukka J,Talvitie-Lamberg K,Maity D.2022.Anthropomorphism and social presence in Human-Virtual service assistant interactions:The role of dialog length and attitudes[J].Computers in Human Behavior,135:107343.
• Nagitta P O,Mugurusi G,Obicci P A,et al.2022.Human-centered artificial intelligence for the public sector:The gate keeping role of the public procurement professional[J].Procedia Computer Science,200:1084-1092.
• Neumann O,Guirguis K,Steiner R.2022.Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations:A comparative case study[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685.
• Park C.2022.Roles of scenario planning for public policy:A case study of Korean artificial intelligence policy[C]//Proceedings of 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference.Izmir:IEEE,56-60.
• Radu R.2021.Steering the governance of artificial intelligence:National strategies in perspective[J].Policy and Society,40(2):178-193.
• Ranerup A,Henriksen H Z.2022.Digital discretion:Unpacking human and technological agency in automated decision making in Sweden's social services[J].Social Science Computer Review,40(2):445-461.
• Rinta-Kahila T,Someh I,Gillespie N,et al.2022.Algorithmic decision-making and system destructiveness:A case of automatic debt recovery[J].European Journal of Information Systems,31(3):313-338.
• Roberts H,Cowls J,Hine E,et al.2021.Achieving a‘Good AI Society’:Comparing the aims and progress of the EU and the US[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,27(6):68.
• Robinson S C.2020.Trust,transparency,and openness:How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI)[J].Technology in Society,63:101421.
• Sampath P G.2021.Governing artificial intelligence in an age of inequality[J].Global Policy,12(S6):21-31.
• Saveliev A,Zhurenkov D.2021.Artificial intelligence and social responsibility:The case of the artificial intelligence strategies in The United States,Russia,and China[J].Kybernetes,50(3):656-675.
• Schiff D S,Schiff K J,Pierson P.2022.Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence[J].Public Administration,100(3):653-673.
• Schuelke-Leech B A,Jordan S R,Barry B.2019.Regulating autonomy:An assessment of policy language for highly automated vehicles[J].Review of Policy Research,36(4):547-579.
• Scutella M,Plewa C,Reaiche C.2022.Virtual agents in the public service:Examining citizens'value-in-use[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2044504.
• Ulnicane I,Knight W,Leach T,et al.2021.Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:Insights from AI policy[J].Policy and Society,40(2):158-177.
• van Noordt C,Misuraca G.2019.New wine in old bottles:Chatbots in government[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Participation.Tronto:Springer,49-59.
• van Noordt C,Misuraca G.2022a.Exploratory insights on artificial intelligence for government in Europe[J].Social Science Computer Review,40(2):426-444.
• van Noordt C,Misuraca G.2022b.Artificial intelligence for the public sector:Results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European union[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(3):101714.
• Vassilakopoulou P,Haug A,Salvesen L M,et al.2023.Developing human/AI interactions for chat-based customer services:Lessons learned from the Norwegian government[J].European Journal of Information Systems,32(1):10-22.
• Vesnic-Alujevic L,Nascimento S,Pólvora A.2020.Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence:Critical notes on European policy frameworks[J].Telecommunications Policy,44(6):101961.
• Vogl T,Seidelin C,Ganesh B,et al.2019.Algorithmic bureaucracy[C]//Proceedings of the20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.Dubai United Arab Emirates:ACM,148-153.
• Waldman A,Martin K.2022.Governing algorithmic decisions:The role of decision importance and governance on perceived legitimacy of algorithmic decisions[J].Big Data&Society,9(1),doi:10.1177/20539517221100449.
• Wang C L,Teo T S H,Janssen M.2021.Public and private value creation using artificial intelligence:An empirical study of AI voice robot users in Chinese public sector[J].International Journal of Information Management,61:102401.
• Wang G,Xie S H,Li X Q.2022a.Artificial intelligence,types of decisions,and street-level bureaucrats:Evidence from a survey experiment[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2070243.
• Wang Y K,Zhang N,Zhao X J.2022b.Understanding the determinants in the different government AI adoption stages:Evidence of local government chatbots in China[J].Social Science Computer Review,40(2):534-554.
• Willems J,Schmid M J,Vanderelst D,et al.2022a.AI-driven public services and the privacy paradox:Do citizens really care about their privacy?[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2063934.
• Willems J,Schmidthuber L,Vogel D,et al.2022b.Ethics of robotized public services:The role of robot design and its actions[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(2):101683.
• Wilson C.2022.Public engagement and AI:A values analysis of national strategies[J].Government Information Quarterly,39(1):101652.
• Wilson C,Broomfield H.2022.Learning how to do AI:Managing organizational boundaries in an intergovernmental learning forum[J].Public Management Review,doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2055119.
• Wilson D,Tweedie F,Rumball-Smith J,et al.2023.Lessons learned from developing ACOVID-19 algorithm governance framework in Aotearoa New Zealand[J].Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand,53(1):82-94.
• Wirtz B W,Langer P F,Fenner C.2021.Artificial intelligence in the Public Sector-AResearch Agenda[J].International Journal of Public Administration,44 (13):1103-1128.
• Wu W J,Huang T J,Gong K.2020.Ethical principles and governance technology development of AI in China[J].Engineering,6(3):302-309.
• Zhu Y H,Janssen M,Wang R.,et al.2022.It Is Me,Chatbot:Working to Address the COVID-19 Outbreak-Related Mental Health Issues in China.User Experience,Satisfaction,and Influencing Factors[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,38(12),1182-1194.doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1988236.