戴正,包国宪

• 1:兰州大学管理学院
• 2:兰州大学中国政府绩效管理研究中心

摘要(Abstract)：

基于整体论分析多要素组态效应范式的定性比较分析方法(Qualitative Comparative Analysis, QCA),可探究政府治理问题中复杂的组态关系。通过系统性文献综述，编码并分析2017—2022年在中国公共管理领域发表的204项QCA研究，以系统识别该方法应用于实践的问题和创新做法。经分析发现，即便QCA应用的操作流程已相对规范和统一，但在各个研究阶段和步骤，不同研究者采用的策略存在显著差异，这表明QCA研究者需要在研究设计、数据分析和解释方面开展更为科学与细致的论证。最后总结了问题集与相关建议，旨在提高中国公共管理领域QCA研究在研究设计、数据报告和应用实践等方面的质量。

关键词(KeyWords)： 定性比较分析;系统性文献综述;必要性分析;充分性分析

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重点项目“国家治理效能目标导向下的政府职责体系优化研究”(项目批准号：20AZD032);; 国家自然科学基金重点项目“政府职能转变背景下绩效管理研究”(项目批准号：71433005);国家自然科学基金青年项目“公共项目绩效的价值建构及测度方法创新研究”(项目批准号：72104095)资助

作者(Author): 戴正,包国宪

参考文献(References)：

• 董健，李兆友.2020.耗散结构论阈下的政府创新系统及其优化策略[J].中国科技论坛，(5):51-60.Dong J,Li Z Y.2020.Government innovation system and its optimal strategy from the theory of dissipative structures[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China,(5):51-60.(in Chinese)
• 杜运周，贾良定.2017.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界，(6):155-167.Du Y Z,Jia L D.2017.Configuration perspective and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA):A new way of management research[J].Management World,(6):155-167.(in Chinese)
• 杜运周，李佳馨，刘秋辰，等.2021.复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法：研究进展与未来方向[J].管理世界，37(3):180-197.Du Y Z,Li J X,Liu Q C,et al.2021.Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective:Research progress and future directions[J].Journal of Management World,37(3):180-197.(in Chinese)
• 杜运周，刘秋辰，陈凯薇，等.2022.营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J].管理世界，38(9):127-144.Du Y Z,Liu Q C,Chen K W,et al.2022.Ecosystem of doing business,total factor productivity and multiple patterns of high-quality development of Chinese cities:A configuration analysis based on complex systems view[J].Journal of Management World,38(9):127-144.(in Chinese)
• 杜运周，刘秋辰，程建青.2020.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界，36(9):141-155.Du Y Z,Liu Q C,Cheng J Q.2020.What Kind of Ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity?A research based on institutional configurations[J].Management World,36(9):141-155.(in Chinese)
• 方齐，谢洪明.2022.科技成果转化政策供给与政策协调的组态效应[J].科学学研究，40(6):991-1000.Fang Q,Xie H M.2022.Configuration effects of policy supply and policy coordination for technology transfer[J].Studies in Science of Science,40(6):991-1000.(in Chinese)
• 黄荣贵，桂勇.2009.互联网与业主集体抗争：一项基于定性比较分析方法的研究[J].社会学研究，24(5):29-56.Huang R G,Gui Y.2009.The internet and homeowners' collective resistance:A qualitative comparative analysis[J].Sociological Studies,24(5):29-56.(in Chinese)
• 黄荣贵.2019.专栏导语：作为一种研究路径的定性比较分析：揭开复杂因果关系的面纱[J].公共行政评论，(4):62-64.Huang R G.2019.Introduction:Qualitative comparative analysis as a research path:Removing the veil complex causality[J].Journal of Public Administration,(4):62-64.(in Chinese)
• 吕鲲，施涵一，靖继鹏.2022.突发公共卫生事件网络舆情热点话题形成组态路径研究——基于微博热搜数据的模糊集定性比较分析[J].情报理论与实践，45(9):148-156.Lü K,Shi H Y,Jing J P.2022.Research on the configuration path of online public opinion hot topics in public health emergencies:Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis based on Microblogging hot search data[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,45(9):148-156.(in Chinese)
• 蒙克，魏必.2023.反思QCA方法的“时间盲区”:为公共管理研究找回“时间”[J].中国行政管理，(1):96-104.Meng K,Wei B.2023.Rethinking the “Time Blindness” of the qualitative comparative analysis:Bringing back “Time” for public management research[J].Chinese Public Administration,(1):96-104.(in Chinese)
• 山少男，段霞.2022.复杂性视角下公共危机多元主体协同治理行为的影响因素与行动路径——基于元分析与模糊集QCA的双重分析[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(1):104-119.Shan S N,Duan X.2022.Impact factors and action paths of collaborative governance behavior of multiple subjects in public crises under complex perspective:A dual analysis based on meta-analysis and QCA model[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(1):104-119.(in Chinese)
• 陶克涛，张术丹，赵云辉.2021.什么决定了政府公共卫生治理绩效?——基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J].管理世界，37(5):128-138.Tao K T,Zhang S D,Zhao Y H.2021.What does determine performance of government public health governance?A study on co-movement effect based on QCA[J].Journal of Management World,37(5):128-138.(in Chinese)
• 武晗，王国华.2021.注意力、模糊性与决策风险：焦点事件何以在回应型议程设置中失灵?——基于40个案例的定性比较分析[J].公共管理学报，18(1):55-65.Wu H,Wang G H.2021.Attention,ambiguity and risk:How focused events fail in responsive agenda setting:A qualitative comparative analysis based on 40 focus events[J].Journal of Public Management,18(1):55-65.(in Chinese)
• 许玉镇，刘滨.2020a.事件属性、科层压力与“关键少数”领导干部决策问责的影响因素——基于60起安全生产事故的定性比较研究[J].中国行政管理，(6):144-151.Xu Y Z,Liu B.2020a.Event attribute,bureaucratic pressure and influencing factors of decision-making accountability of “Key Minority” leading cadres:Based on 60 safety production accidents through QCA[J].Chinese Public Administration,(6):144-151.(in Chinese)
• 许玉镇，刘滨.2020b.权责结构与领导批示：官员问责的政治逻辑分析——基于2005年以来我国安全生产事故官员问责的混合研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报，60(2):145-158.Xu Y Z,Liu B.2020b.Political logic analysis of official accountability:A mixed study on the accountability of safety production accident officials since 2005[J].Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition,60(2):145-158.(in Chinese)
• 薛澜，刘冰，戚淑芳.2011.能源回弹效应的研究进展及其政策涵义[J].中国人口·资源与环境，21(10):55-59.Xue L,Liu B,Qi S F.2011.Rebound effect and its impact on policies of energy-saving and emission reduction[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,21(10):55-59.(in Chinese)
• 杨志，魏姝.2020.政策爆发生成机理：影响因素、组合路径及耦合机制——基于25个案例的定性比较分析[J].公共管理学报，17(2):14-26.Yang Z,Wei S.2020.Formation mechanism of policy outbreaks:Key factors,combined path and its coupling process:A QCA study on 25 cases[J].Journal of Public Management,17(2):14-26.(in Chinese)
• 张明，杜运周.2019.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用：定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报，16(9):1312-1323.Zhang M,Du Y Z.2019.Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in management and organization research:Position,tactics,and directions[J].Chinese Journal of Management,16(9):1312-1323.(in Chinese)
• Andrews R,Beynon M J,McDermott A M.2016.Organizational capability in the public sector:A configurational approach[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,26(2):239-258.
• Aversa P,Furnari S,Haefliger S.2015.Business model configurations and performance:A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing,2005—2013[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,24(3):655-676.
• Braumoeller B F,Goertz G.2000.The methodology of necessary conditions[J].American Journal of Political Science,44(4):844-858.
• Cooper B,Glaesser J.2011.Paradoxes and pitfalls in using fuzzy set QCA:Illustrations from a critical review of a study of educational inequality[J].Sociological Research Online,16(3):106-119.
• Cooper B,Glaesser J.2016.Qualitative comparative analysis,necessary conditions,and limited diversity:Some problematic consequences of Schneider and Wagemann's enhanced standard analysis[J].Field Methods,28(3):300-315.
• Douglas S,Berthod O,Groenleer M,et al.2020.Pathways to collaborative performance:Examining the different combinations of conditions under which collaborations are successful[J].Policy and Society,39(4):638-658.
• Du Y Z,Kim P H.2021.One size does not fit all:Strategy configurations,complex environments,and new venture performance in emerging economies[J].Journal of Business Research,124:272-285.
• Du?a A.2018.QCA with R:A Comprehensive Resource[M].Springer International Publishing.
• Fainshmidt S,Wenger L,Pezeshkan A,et al.2019.When do dynamic capabilities lead to competitive advantage?The importance of strategic fit[J].Journal of Management Studies,56(4):758-787.
• Fiss P C.2011.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,54(2):393-420.
• Furnari S,Crilly D,Misangyi V F,et al.2021.Capturing causal complexity:Heuristics for configurational theorizing[J].Academy of Management Review,46(4):778-799.
• Greckhamer T.2011.Cross-cultural differences in compensation level and inequality across occupations:A set-theoretic analysis[J].Organization Studies,32(1):85-115.
• Greckhamer T.2016.CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries:The configurational impact of country-level institutions[J].Strategic Management Journal,37(4):793-815.
• Greckhamer T,Furnari S,Fiss P C,et al.2018.Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis:Best practices in strategy and organization research[J].Strategic Organization,16(4):482-495.
• Krogslund C,Choi D D,Poertner M.2015.Fuzzy sets on shaky ground:Parameter sensitivity and confirmation bias in fsQCA[J].Political Analysis,23(1):21-41.
• Lazzarini S G,Pongeluppe L S,Ito N C,et al.2020.Public capacity,plural forms of collaboration,and the performance of public initiatives:A configurational approach[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,30(4):579-595.
• Moher D,Shamseer L,Clarke M,et al.2015.Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement[J].Systematic Reviews,4(1):1.
• Mosley J E,Wong J.2021.Decision-making in collaborative governance networks:Pathways to input and throughput legitimacy[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,31(2):328-345.
• Oana I E,Schneider C Q,Thomann E.2021.Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R:A Beginner's Guide[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Park Y K,Fiss P C,El Sawy O A.2020.Theorizing the multiplicity of digital phenomena:The ecology of configurations,causal recipes,and guidelines for applying QCA[J].MIS Quarterly,44(4):1493-1520.
• Ragin C C.1987.The Comparative Method[M].Berkeley:University of California Press.
• Ragin C C.2000.Fuzzy-set Social Science[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
• Ragin C C,Sonnett J.2005.Between complexity and parsimony:Limited diversity,counterfactual cases,and comparative analysis[M]//Kropp S,Minkenberg M.Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft.Wiesbaden:VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Ragin C C.2008.Redesigning Social Inquiry[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
• Rubinson C.2019.Presenting qualitative comparative analysis:Notation,tabular layout,and visualization[J].Methodological Innovations,12(2).
• Schneider C Q,Wagemann C.2010.Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets[J].Comparative Sociology,9(3):397-418.
• Schneider C Q,Wagemann C.2012.Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Schneider C Q,Wagemann C.2016.Assessing ESA on what it is designed for:A reply to Cooper and Glaesser[J].Field Methods,28(3):316-321.
• Schneider C Q.2018.Realists and Idealists in QCA[J].Political Analysis,26(2):246-254.
• Thiem A.2016.Standards of good practice and the methodology of necessary conditions in qualitative comparative analysis[J].Political Analysis,24(4):478-484.
• Verweij S,Vis B.2021.Three strategies to track configurations over time with Qualitative Comparative Analysis[J].European Political Science Review,13(1):95-111.
• Wagemann C,Schneider C Q.2015.Transparency standards in qualitative comparative analysis[J].Qualitative & Multi-Method Research,13(1):38-42.
• Wang W J.2016.Exploring the determinants of network effectiveness:The case of neighborhood governance networks in Beijing[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,26(2):375-388.
• Warsen R,Klijn E H,Koppenjan J.2019.Mix and match:How contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public–private partnerships[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,29(3):375-393.
• (1)核心条件是结果的基础,无法被消除,并且最终必须是所有解的一部分(Ragin and Sonnett,2005;Rubinson,2019)。
• (2)模糊集中,解的覆盖度表示完整条件组合所解释结果的隶属度的比例;原始覆盖度表示单个条件组合所解释结果的隶属度的比例;唯一覆盖度代表了仅由单个条件组合所解释的结果隶属度的比例(其他条件组合没有涵盖的隶属度)。